top
North Coast
North Coast
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

PL's Mattole Watershed Analysis- A Threat to the Mattole

by SAF
Update on the Mattole.
Pacific Lumber has not filed any new Timber Harvest Plans (THP's) in the Mattole this year. At first this may seem like good news to forest advocates and defenders. There is, however, a huge potential threat looming in the fog.

PL's "Watershed Analysis" for the Mattole River and Bear River threatens to reduce protection for watercourses. This would allow extensive logging closer to creeks and springs.

What seems to be widely unknown is the fact that most of PL's THP's in the Mattole over the last several years have included clauses allowing entry into streamside protection zones (buffers) in the event that protections are reduced.

A large portion of the remaining 2,000+ acres of Old Growth forest is within the current streamside buffers.

There are no-cut buffers as well as buffers that limit the amount of trees that can be taken from a given area.

What do these buffers do?
They shade the watercourses which keeps the water cold and suitable for salmon.
They can sometimes stop sediment runoff from logged-over areas.
The roots of the trees act sort of like rebar, holding the streambanks together during high water flow and when the soil becomes saturated with water during the winter rains.

A THP will expire after 3 years unless the company asks to extend the life of the plan. Extensions can keep the plan open for up to five years.

This quote is from one of the logging plans.

"These areas are proposed as "Deffered No Harvest" and may be modified through amendment prior to THP expiration to allow timber harvesting pursuant to prescriptions agreed upon in the watershed analysis process (HCP 6.3.2.2)."

Basically, if buffers are reduced, there will be an onslaught on the streamside areas in the Mattole. Pacific Lumber would be required only to file an amendment on any previously logged THP and then go in and cut.

There will likely be a comment period on these amendments. The amendment process would be much more rapid than the full THP approval process.

Even if they don't take advantage of this clause, reduced buffers will allow PL or any future landowner to file new THP's and cut in the fragile zones along watercourses.
posted by saf @ 9:54 PM

for more info check out:
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Shunka Wakan
Sat, Jul 29, 2006 10:09PM
tran
Fri, Jul 28, 2006 4:55PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network