remote control 757

remote control 757

http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=48

Two of the aircraft exceeded their software limits on 9/11.

The Boeing 757 and 767 are equipped with fully autonomous flight capability,
they are the only two Boeing commuter aircraft capable of fully autonomous
flight. They can be programmed to take off, fly to a destination and land,
completely without a pilot at the controls.

They are intelligent planes, and have software limits pre set so that pilot
error cannot cause passenger injury. Though they are physically capable of
high g maneuvers, the software in their flight control systems prevents high
g maneuvers from being performed via the cockpit controls. They are limited
to approximately 1.5 g's, I repeat, one and one half g's. This is so that a
pilot mistake cannot end up breaking grandma's neck.

No matter what the pilot wants, he cannot override this feature.

The plane that hit the Pentagon approached or reached its actual physical
limits, military personnel have calculated that the Pentagon plane pulled
between five and seven g's in its final turn.

The same is true for the second aircraft to impact the WTC.

There is only one way this can happen.

As well as fully autonomous flight capability, the 767 and 757 are the ONLY
COMMUTER PLANES MADE BY BOEING THAT CAN BE FLOWN VIA REMOTE CONTROL. It is a
feature that is standard to all of them, all 757's and 767's can do it. The
purpose for this is if there is a problem with the pilots, Norad can fly the
planes to safe destinations via remote. Only in this flight mode can those
craft exceed their software limits and perform to their actual physical
limits because a pre existing emergency situation is assumed if this mode of
flight is used.

Terrorists in fact did not fly those planes, it is totally and completely
impossible for those planes to have been flown in such a manner from the
cockpit. Those are commuter aircraft, not F-16's and their software knows
it.

Another piece of critical evidence: the voice recorders came up blank.

The flight recorders that were recovered had tape that was undamaged inside,
but it was blank. There is only one way this can happen on a 757 or 767.
When the aircraft are commandeered via remote control, the microphones that
go to the cockpit voice recorder are re routed to the people doing the
remote controlling, so that the recording of what happened in the cockpit
gets made in a presumably safer place. But due to a glitch in the system on
a 757/767, rather than shutting off when the mic is redirected the voice
recorder keeps running. The voice recorders use what is called a continuous
loop tape, which automatically re passes itself past the erase and record
heads once every half hour, so after a half hour of running with the
microphones redirected, the tape will be blank. Just like the recovered
tapes were. Yet more proof that no pilot flew those planes in the last half
hour.

Eight of the hijackers who were on those planes called up complaining that
they were still alive. I'd bet you never heard about our foreign minister
flying to Morocco and issuing an official apology to the accused, did you?
No, terrorists did not fly those planes, plastic knives and box cutters were
in fact too ridiculous to be true. Any of the remaining accused have
certainly been sought out and killed by now.

Our information IS controlled

The cell phone calls from the aircraft could not have happened. I am a
National Security Agency trained Electronic Warfare specialist, and am
qualified to say this. My official title: MOS33Q10, Electronic Warfare
Intercept Strategic Signal Processing/Storage Systems Specialist, a highly
skilled MOS which requires advanced knowledge of many communications methods
and circuits to the most minute level. I am officially qualified to place
severe doubt that ordinary cell phone calls were ever made from the
aircraft.

It was impossible for that to have happened, especially in a rural area for
a number of reasons.

When you make a cell phone call, the first thing that happens is that your
cell phone needs to contact a transponder. Your cell phone has a max
transmit power of five watts, three watts is actually the norm. If an
aircraft is going five hundred miles an hour, your cell phone will not be
able to 1. Contact a tower, 2. Tell the tower who you are, and who your
provider is, 3. Tell the tower what mode it wants to communicate with, and
4. Establish that it is in a roaming area before it passes out of a five
watt range. This procedure, called an electronic handshake, takes
approximately 45 seconds for a cell phone to complete upon initial power up
in a roaming area because neither the cell phone or cell transponder knows
where that phone is and what mode it uses when it is turned on. At 500 miles
an hour, the aircraft will travel three times the range of a cell phone's
five watt transmitter before this handshaking can occur. Though it is
sometimes possible to connect during takeoff and landing, under the
situation that was claimed the calls were impossible. The calls from the
airplane were faked, no if's or buts.

I hope I made sense, if you have questions I will respond if possible. If I
do not respond, please research this out yourself, search the boeing site,
search the DARPA site, search were you have not searched before. Some of the
information is classified and leaked by individuals, and it is also being
scoured from the net. I have all of the original documents on my computer to
safeguard against this.

Please do not ignore this, because only Norad has the flight codes for those
aircraft, we did 911 to ourselves. Hitler had the Reichstag, we have 911. If
911 proves to not be enough to make the US citizenry set aside its rights
for safety, the people who did 911 most certainly have access to nuclear
material. 911 must be exposed for what it was before that material is used.