SF Bay Area Indymedia indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate

Iraq | International

Kirkuk at the Center of Kurdish-Shiite Struggles
by Juan Cole (reposted)
Monday Mar 6th, 2006 6:17 AM
...

Monday, March 06, 2006

Kirkuk at the Center of Kurdish-Shiite Struggles

I find most reporting on the struggle between Iraq's Kurdish president, Jalal Talabani and the current Shiite Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari, to be awfully superficial and to allow itself to be led by Talabani's talking points.

What is really going on here has to do with Jaafari's positions on federalism, the oil-rich city of Kirkuk, and Kurdish-Turkish relations.

1) Jaafari has promised Turkey that if the 5,000 or so members of the Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK) who have taken refuge in Iraqi Kurdistan do not behave themselves, they will be expelled. A lot of Iraqi Kurdish politicians are said to sympathize with these PKK refugees.

2) Jaafari is not happy about letting the Kurds just pour into Kirkuk province and take it over demographically. There are a lot of Turkmen and Arabs in Kirkuk, some proportion of them Shiites and so Jaafari's natural constituency. The interim constitution specified a referendum in Kirkuk on joining the Kurdistan regional confederacy. The Kurds will certainly win it. If they do, they will permanently marginalize the Turkmen and Arabs, and will monopolize the northern oil fields for their nationalist purposes, probably leading to ethnic war in the Iraqi north but in any case setting the stage for Kurdish secession.

3) Jaafari dislikes the "Kurdish model" of very weak central government and powerful regional confederacies for Iraq. The Kurds are fiercely protective of the Kurdish model, and convinced Abdul Aziz al-Hakim of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq to adopt it for the Shiite south. It will almost certainly break up the country.

Jaafari is not being attacked because he is weak, or indecisive, or because he could not keep order in the country. He is being attacked for the opposite reasons-- that he has decisively decided to fight the Kurds on their planned annexation of Kirkuk. The Kurds are powerful, so Jaafari reached out to Ankara for an ally. He was pressed by the Turks to make Kirkuk a city with a "special status" as a way of denying it to the Kurds, and he may have acquiesced. This is the reason that Talabani went ballistic over the prime minister's visit to Turkey.

FBIS paraphrase of the Turkish Press for March 5 (pub. Mar. 6)


' A 400-word article by Nur Batur of Istanbul views the "background" of the disagreement between Talabani and Al-Ja'fari, noting that the Iraqi prime minister's approach on the status of Kirkuk is similar to that of Turkey, which is against the Kurds' inclination to change the status of this province. Describing Iraq as a "chaotic" country, Batur asserts that all the ethnic and religious groups are trying to assume an influential role in the new Iraqi administration and place the country's rich oil reserves under their control. (Istanbul Hurriyet -- centre-right, mass appeal daily, country's top circulation paper, owned by Aydin Dogan, head of the Dogan Media Group . . .

A 300-word report by Senay Yildiz says that speaking to Al-Ja'fari assured the Turkish nation that "a civil war will not break out in Iraq and the future of his country will be in line with the expectations of Turkey." Commenting on the PKK presence in Iraq, the prime minister promised that "they will either leave Iraq or cease arms." (
http://www.aksam.com.tr/ http://www.aksam.com.tr/">Istanbul Turkiye'de Aksam
-- center-right daily owned by Cukurova industrial and financial group, headed by Mehmet Emin Karamehmet, who is a politically-active member of the Association of Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen, TUSIAD, one of the most prestigious business associations in Turkey . . . '



FBIS paraphrases Iraqi newspapers for March 5:

'Al-Furat runs on the front page a 400-word report citing Iraqi sources confirming that Al-Ja'fari's stance towards Article 58 of the State Administration Law and the implementation of federalism are behind the recent calls for his exclusion. The report cites citizens urging Iraqi political forces to favor Iraq's national interests.'


(Article 58 concerns the future of Kirkuk.)

FBIS also reports:



' Al-Bayan carries on the front page a 500-word report that Al-Amarah's inhabitants staged a peaceful demonstration supporting Ibrahim al-Ja'fari. The report cites Salih al-Mutlak, chairman of National Dialogue Front, denying that his front has called on Unified Iraqi Coalition to change Ibrahim al-Ja'fari as prime minister. . . '

' Al-Furat carries on page 2 a 600-word column by Hasan al-Ta'i criticizing Iraqi political forces for holding Al-Ja'fari totally responsible for the deteriorating security, and political situation. The writer says all Iraqi political forces, including the forces that are not part of the government, are equally responsible for Iraq's current situation. . . '

' Al-Furat runs on the front page a 120-word report citing an official source at Kirkuk Advisory Council confirming the dismissal of Kirkuk Police Chief General Shirku Shakir Rahim by Interior Ministry. . . '

Al-Da'wah carries on the front page a 100-word report citing Iraqi sources saying that a number of Iraqi officers affiliated with Iyad Allawi are being trained in Washington without the knowledge of their ministries. . .

Al-Da'wah carries on the front page a 100-word report citing a well-informed source in Basra denying that Unified Iraqi Coalition candidate Qasim Atiyah al-Juburi escaped an assassination attempt.






It is worthwhile looking at the FBIS articles around Jaafari's recent visit to Ankara, which appears to have reinforced the Kurds' determination to get rid of him.
--------

Turkey's Iraqi Envoy Expresses Views on Kirkuk, Violence; Conveys Erdogan Letter
TURKISH PM SENDS LETTER TO HIS IRAQI COUNTERPART" -- AA headline
Anatolia
Friday, February 24, 2006 T13:10:19Z

ANKARA (A.A) - 24.02.2006 - Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan sent a letter to Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafari on Friday, sources said on Friday.

According to the sources, Erdogan's letter was conveyed to al-Jafari by Turkey's Special Representative to Iraq Oguz Celikkol. Celikkol had separate meetings with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and PM al-Jafari yesterday. Today, Celikkol will meet Abd al-Aziz al-Hakim, the head of Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, and leaders of several Iraqi groups including Sunni leader Tariq al-Hashimi.

In these meetings, Celikkol expresses Turkey's views about Kirkuk, and stresses that formation of a broad-based government in Iraq and completion of the constitutional process would strengthen Iraq's integrity.

Celikkol also expresses Turkey's concern over recent acts of violence in this region.

(Description of Source: Ankara Anatolia in English -- Semi-official news agency; independent in content)

-----
Erdogan Explains to Al-Ja'fari Turkey's Concerns Over PKK Presence in North Iraq
"PM ERDOGAN MEETS PM AL-JAFARI OF IRAQ" -- AA headline
Anatolia
Tuesday, February 28, 2006 T19:11:53Z

ANKARA (A.A) - 28.02.2006 - Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan met on Tuesday Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafari, who is currently in Ankara on an official visit.

During the meeting, Prime Minister Erdogan explained Turkey's views about recent developments in Iraq, and expressed Turkey's concerns about presence of the terrorist organization PKK in northern part of Iraq.

Prime Minister Erdogan also reiterated that Kirkuk's demographic structure should be preserved.

He highlighted importance of formation of a broad-based government in Iraq that would avert the supremacy of one group over the others. Recent acts of violence were also high on agenda of the meeting.

Prime Minister Erdogan stressed that some circles were trying to drag Iraq into an atmosphere of ethnic turmoil. "It is certain that everyone will suffer unless the flames of ethnic tensions that are being provoked are extinguished," he said.
Meanwhile, talks have been under way for Turkey's meeting 25 percent of Iraq's electricity requirement.

(Description of Source: Ankara Anatolia in English -- Semi-official news agency; independent in content)

---------------
Turkey: AA Reports More on Erdogan-Al-Ja'fari Meeting
"POLITICAL & RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES SHOULD COMBAT TERRORISM, PM" -- AA headline
Anatolia
Tuesday, February 28, 2006 T15:10:52Z


ANKARA (A.A) - 28.02.2006 - Political and religious authorities should take joint action against terrorism to prevent terrorist groups in Iraq from reaching their goals and intentions, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Tuesday.
After his meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafari, Erdogan told reporters that developments, aiming to overshadow December 2005 general elections, were being seen in Iraq.

Erdogan indicated that this step taken by the terrorist groups was tried to be shown as a sectarian conflict.

"None of Sunnis can attempt to bomb Ahlibayt Tomb. This doesn't seem possible. So, political and religious authorities should take joint action against terrorism to prevent terrorist groups from reaching their goals and intentions," stressed Erdogan.
Erdogan said, "we have a goal in Iraq, comprised of five main aspects. First of these aspects is to ensure Iraq's territorial integrity. Secondly, all resources of Iraq should belong to all Iraqi people. Third, none of ethnic groups should have hegemony over the other. Fourth, none of sectarian groups should dominate others.
Fifthly and lastly, Kirkuk should have a special status."

PM Erdogan emphasized that all those goals could be achieved by a broad-based Iraqi government.

Noting that the process launched by Iraq's neighbors should also be speeded up, Erdogan said that al-Jafari also welcomed this process.

-AL-JAFARI'S SPEECH- Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafari indicated that he would like to thank Turkey for sending special representative to Iraq and showing great interest in his country.

Stating that there have been important developments in Iraq in 2005, al-Jafari recalled that general elections were held, the parliament was formed and the constitution came into force last year.

Al-Jafari said that he hoped that 2006 would be a year when political process would be successful.

Noting that undesired incidents that took place in Iraq over the recent days were intentional terrorist activities, he indicated that enemies of Iraq who could not assimilate the process in Iraq carried out harmful activities to prepare a basis for continuation of lack of security.

Al-Jafari said that on the other hand, these incidents caused Iraqi people to be united, underlining that Iraqi people were aware that these incidents were complot and provocation.

He noted that the government started to exert efforts to prevent these violent acts from spreading over the country, stating that incidents were taken under control.
AL-Jafari stressed that incidents and terrorist activities in Iraq would not make a negative impact on works of the government and efforts for ongoing political process to be successful.

(Description of Source: Ankara Anatolia in English -- Semi-official news agency; independent in content)

posted by Juan @ 3/06/2006 06:24:00 AM   


Comments  (Hide Comments)

Mr
by Azad
( azadopoliss [at] yahoo.co.uk ) Monday Mar 6th, 2006 10:55 AM
What Juan Cole says may be right but what is so wrong with talabani attempting to assert the Kurd's rghts. The Kurds have tried hard to patch up the troubles between teh Sunnis adn Shiites, often being the factor that brought the parties together. Using the Kirkuk issue to shackle Kurdistan to Iraq is a reprehesible one which will only prolong the tensions between the Kurds and Arabs. It is not just about the oil for teh Kurds. Kirkuk represents the heart of Kurdish culture, and was the region singled out by Saddam during his Anfal genocide campaign against the Kurds. Today there are thousands of Arabs who were 'invited' into Kurdish homes. The former owners wre either killed outright or fled. The Kurdish returnees now live in appalling conditions in a football stadium and in outlying ghettos. At the same time the incoming Arabs continue to enjoy the homes of people who were ethnically cleansed from them. These people are his consituents too. Talabani is mindful of their condition and the cold-hearted failure by Jaafari to do a thing for any of tehse people. We must also not forget that Jaafari has a history of riding roughshod over others and Talaani has oft-asked for his censure. History repeats itself again In Iraq.
Unfair Analysis
by eamad mazouri
( eamazouri [at] gmail.com ) Monday Mar 6th, 2006 12:35 PM
A comment on Mr. Juan Cole's article titled"Kirkuk at the Center of Kurdish-Shitte Struggle
I would like to know why somebody like Mr. Cole who is by all standard is an academic and accomplished intellectual would make such unfair analysis about the latest conflict in Iraq on the position of premiership?
First, he is contradicting himself by describing the conflict between the two sides as superficial, and then listing many major points where both sides' views do not meet.
We have to remember that al-jaafary is at the end of his term or rather in a transitional stage where he is not suppose to take any major strides without the coalition's general concensus taking into consideration the fragile state of the government and the country, let alone taking unilateral decisions. Al-Jaafary throughout his term made many mistakes especially concerning Kurds and their legitimate rights.
Kirkuk issue although a major one for the kurds, but it is not the only one.Kurds are seeking the reversal of the entire arabization of their ancestral land, and that include many other areas besides Kirkuk.When Dictator Saddam evicted the destitute Kurds from Kirkuk with only the cloth on their backs, nobody was their to defend them. What I don't understand is some people are aimimg to perptuate that policy of Arabization.
Furthermore, the Kurds have chosen federalism as the best solution for their problem today where all their rights would be secured while enjoying the protection of a sovereign state.
There are no plans for anything else.
Why would al-jaafary hate the Kurdish model? If he does that because he has racist inclinations and tendencies or is wishing to control Kurdistan as well, something that is totally rejected by Kurds.Kurds have not asked for anything that would break the country apart other than their legitimate national demands.On the contrary, they have become the corner stone for the unity of the country with the testimony of many neutral observers.
Overall, Mr. Cole you have to admit that the right in this dispute is on the Kurdish side not al-jaafary.The Kurds are the only element in Iraq who truly want to build up a new democratic, federated and tolerant country where all the people can live at peace and prosper while others are trying to turn the country into either a dictatorship or a fundamental Islamic country.
Unfair Analysis
by eamad mazouri
( eamazouri [at] gmail.com ) Monday Mar 6th, 2006 12:37 PM
A comment on Mr. Juan Cole's article titled"Kirkuk at the Center of Kurdish-Shitte Struggle
I would like to know why somebody like Mr. Cole who is by all standard is an academic and accomplished intellectual would make such unfair analysis about the latest conflict in Iraq on the position of premiership?
First, he is contradicting himself by describing the conflict between the two sides as superficial, and then listing many major points where both sides' views do not meet.
We have to remember that al-jaafary is at the end of his term or rather in a transitional stage where he is not suppose to take any major strides without the coalition's general concensus taking into consideration the fragile state of the government and the country, let alone taking unilateral decisions. Al-Jaafary throughout his term made many mistakes especially concerning Kurds and their legitimate rights.
Kirkuk issue although a major one for the kurds, but it is not the only one.Kurds are seeking the reversal of the entire arabization of their ancestral land, and that include many other areas besides Kirkuk.When Dictator Saddam evicted the destitute Kurds from Kirkuk with only the cloth on their backs, nobody was their to defend them. What I don't understand is some people are aimimg to perptuate that policy of Arabization.
Furthermore, the Kurds have chosen federalism as the best solution for their problem today where all their rights would be secured while enjoying the protection of a sovereign state.
There are no plans for anything else.
Why would al-jaafary hate the Kurdish model? If he does that because he has racist inclinations and tendencies or is wishing to control Kurdistan as well, something that is totally rejected by Kurds.Kurds have not asked for anything that would break the country apart other than their legitimate national demands.On the contrary, they have become the corner stone for the unity of the country with the testimony of many neutral observers.
Overall, Mr. Cole you have to admit that the right in this dispute is on the Kurdish side not al-jaafary.The Kurds are the only element in Iraq who truly want to build up a new democratic, federated and tolerant country where all the people can live at peace and prosper while others are trying to turn the country into either a dictatorship or a fundamental Islamic country.
Unfair comment
by Savas Noredin
Monday Mar 6th, 2006 4:09 PM
Befor any comment on Jaaferi, i would like to underline the unfair comment of the gentelman, for Kurds to create a federation means to control the oil fields to be able to survive. and that means invation of Kerkuk. which means to change the demographic state of the city, which means to asimilate Turkmens and Arabs.

Let us say Jaaferi is overthrown and a new shiite PM elected. the position on Kerkuk will remain the same. So why Talabani is making such a big deal of it? 'couse He don't wish to have the new parlement start untill the urban war starts so Kurds can disunite from Iraq.

Best Regards
Logic and facts talk here
by eamad mazouri
( eamazouri [at] gmail.com ) Wednesday Mar 8th, 2006 3:07 PM
Befor any comment on Jaaferi, i would like to underline the unfair comment of the gentelman, for Kurds to create a federation means to control the oil fields to be able to survive. and that means invation of Kerkuk. which means to change the demographic state of the city, which means to asimilate Turkmens and Arabs.

Let us say Jaaferi is overthrown and a new shiite PM elected. the position on Kerkuk will remain the same. So why Talabani is making such a big deal of it? 'couse He don't wish to have the new parlement start untill the urban war starts so Kurds can disunite from Iraq
It is true that real federalism would mean reversing the abhored policy of arabization, which means the return of all those who were evicted forcefully by the deposed dictator Saddam.That include Kurds, Turkmans and others.Kurds are not after oil only, they are rather after their anceral lands that were wrestled from them by previous Iraqi government. Not to mention that all the oil revenues since nationalization have been turned into weapons and used against Kurds.What Kurds are asking for is fair;the return of those refugees who are the original denizens of Kirkuk to their homes and be compensated for their great loses and long sufferings regardless of their ethnicity.I don't think this means demographic change of the city as much as it means to right the wrong, especially since nobody protested this crime when it was committed by the regime.This surely does not mean assimilating others.Any unbias observer can take a look at the facts on the ground and see the truth. For the first time in their history, all the ethnic and religious minorities are enjoying their rights in Kurdistan since 1992, when they were deprived of such rights in areas under Saddam's control.They are fully participating in the political process and their children are studying in their own languages, let alone all the media in their own toungue. If you can call this assimilation , then what would you call what Turkey is doing to over 15 million Kurds who were untill recently were called mountain Turks?
Once again, Kurds are not seeking excuses to declare independence.They have chosen willfully to have a voluntary union with the rest of Iraq, only when they can choose how.The very principle of voluntary union does not accept imposition of certain solutions.They Kurds have lived freely for almost 15 years now. Anew Kurdish generation has been nourished on the principles of freedom, rights and liberties.In order to bring them back to Iraq, this country has to offer them something new other than arabization, deprivation, chemical weapons and total destruction of Kurdistan throughout Iraq's modern history.
The return of Kirkuk and other arbized parts to the bossom of Kurdistan is sure thing if democracy, fairness and justice is prevailed which we hope it will at the end.