top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

More revelations of illegal spying by US government

by wsws (reposted)
Over the past week, several new reports have emerged casting additional light on the vast extent of illegal spying carried out by the US government. It is becoming increasingly clear that the government has initiated a major project to collect and database the communications of US citizens and non-citizens, including opponents of the war in Iraq and other policies of the Bush administration.

Moves to initiate the program began before September 11, 2001. However, as with all the policies pursued by the government since then, the terrorist attacks have been used to justify the spying under the overarching pretext of the “war on terrorism.”

James Risen, one of the authors of the original New York Times article exposing a broad program of spying by the National Security Agency (NSA) without legally required court-issued warrants, has published a book entitled State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration. The book elaborates on what has already become clear from Risen’s own articles and other reports that have emerged in the press: that the spying program is much broader than the administration has been forced to acknowledge, and includes surveillance on purely domestic communications as well as communications entering and leaving the United States.

Risen reports that the NSA has been able to gain access to telecommunications switches, which are routing stations run by a handful of giant companies that direct large quantities of telephone calls and e-mails. “Unknown to most Americans,” Risen writes, “the NSA has extremely close relationships with both the telecommunications and computer industries, according to several government officials. Only a very few top executives in each corporation are aware of such relationships or know about the willingness of the corporations to cooperate on intelligence matters.”

These switches contain both international communications and communications entirely within the US. Because the US controls the Internet infrastructure, much of the world’s e-mail traffic at some point passes through stations located within the United States. “With its direct access to the US telecommunications system, there seems to be no physical or logistical obstacle to prevent the NSA from eavesdropping on anyone in the United States that it chooses,” Risen writes. The program established to allow the NSA spying is a highly secretive “special access program,” with no oversight or accountability required from the NSA regarding the communications it decides to monitor and for what reason.

More
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jan2006/nsa-j07.shtml
§more
by more
CAIRO, January7 , 2006 (IslamOnline.net) – US President George W. Bush has violated existing laws by authorizing warrantless eavesdropping on Americans and his justification depended on weak legal argument, according to a report by the Congress’s research arm, the first nonpartisan findings on the program to date.

A 44 -page report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) rebutted recent assertions by Bush and Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales about the president's authority to order secret intercepts of telephone and e-mail exchanges between people inside the United States and their contacts abroad, The Washington Post reported on Saturday, January7 .

It said the broad presidential powers granted to the US president in the wake of the9 / 11attacks did not authorize him to order the secret monitoring of calls made by US citizens, but authorized him to use military force when necessary to protect homeland security.

In the wake of the September 2001 attacks, Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency (NSA) to intercept communications without court approval.

A 1978 law, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), forbids domestic spying on US citizens without the approval of a special court.

Bush has defended an executive order he signed in 2002 allowing eavesdropping without warrants, saying it was limited only to monitoring international phone and e-mail communications linked to people with connections to Al-Qaeda.

But The New York Times reported in December that the NSA has "directly" tapped the country’s main communications systems without court-approved warrants.

It further revealed on January1 , that James Comey, a deputy to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, was concerned about the legality of the NSA program and refused to extend it in2004 .

Weak Argument

The congressional report also concluded that Bush's defense of authorizing the spying was not "well-grounded."

"It appears unlikely that a court would hold that Congress has expressly or impliedly authorized the NSA electronic surveillance operations here," said the authors.

The Bush administration's legal justification "does not seem to be . . . well-grounded," they maintained.

Some law professors have been skeptical of Bush's assertions, and several said the report's conclusions were expected.

"Ultimately, the administration's position is not persuasive," Carl W. Tobias, a University of Richmond law professor and an expert on constitutional law, told the Post.

"Congress has made it pretty clear it has legislated pretty comprehensively on this issue with FISA," he said.

"And there begins to be a pattern of unilateral executive decision making. Time and again, there's the executive acting alone without consulting the courts or Congress."

Still, Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the administration believes the program is on firm legal footing.

"The national security activities described by the president were conducted in accord with the law and provide a critical tool in the war on terror that saves lives and protects civil liberties at the same time."

Hearings

The CRS findings prompted Democratic lawmakers and civil liberties advocates to repeat calls for Congress to conduct hearings on the controversial spying program and attempt to halt it.

"This report contradicts the president's claim that his spying on Americans was legal," said Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), one of the lawmakers who asked the CRS to research the issue.

"It looks like the president's wiretapping was not only illegal, but also ensnared innocent Americans who did nothing more than place a phone call."

Democratic and Republican lawmakers -- chiefly Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.); chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee -- pledged Friday to conduct Congressional hearings on the monitoring program, the Post said.

Last week, Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called for an inquiry into the incident.

"The Senate Intelligence Committee would be a better place than the judiciary panel to investigate the program," he told Fox News on January1 .

http://islamonline.net/English/News/2006-01/07/article04.shtml
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$40.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network