top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Bush employees “Big Lie” technique to defend illegal spying on Americans

by wsws (reposted)
The Bush administration is employing its standard tactics of fear-mongering, intimidation and lies to defend its illegal spying on Americans. Bush, Vice President Cheney and other administration spokesmen repeatedly assert that Bush’s secret authorization for the National Security Agency (NSA) to monitor international telephone calls and email messages sent from the US without obtaining court-issued warrants does not violate either legal statutes or the Constitution.
In fact, the practice directly contravenes the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures and violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), passed by Congress in 1978. That law was enacted in response to revelations of illegal government spying on Americans on a massive scale that emerged during the Watergate crisis. FISA established the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court as a secret body to oversee and approve government requests for wiretaps and other forms of electronic surveillance. The law explicitly bars warrantless wiretaps.

So brazen is the administration’s defiance of the law and the constitutional principle of congressional and judicial oversight of the executive branch that one of the eleven judges on the secret FISA court resigned Wednesday in protest. This is a court which routinely grants government requests for wiretaps, usually within a few hours and, when requested, retroactively—a fact the White House ignores in claiming that it must bypass the court to quickly track the movement of terrorist suspects within the US.

One of Bush’s claims, that the NSA program does not target purely domestic communications, was exploded by a report in Wednesday’s New York Times. The article cited unnamed officials who affirmed that the NSA had intercepted communications to and from people within the borders of the US.

Vice President Cheney, speaking on Tuesday to reporters aboard Air Force Two as he flew from Pakistan to Oman, indicated the real motivations behind the administration’s decision to override legal limits on its powers to conduct electronic surveillance. According to press reports, he said, “Watergate and a lot of the things during the ’70s served, I think, to erode the authority I think the president needs to be effective, especially in the national security area.”

More
http://wsws.org/articles/2005/dec2005/bush-d24.shtml
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by me
When is everyone going to wake up and realize that the US is now under the control of a dictator? If Bush gets away with this one, then there is nothing to prevent him from spying on anyone for whatever reason (so long as he states that it's for the purpose of fighting terrorism. Think about it: if the spying is to be kept secret even from a secret court, how is anyone going to know who Bush decides to spy on and for what plausible purpose?)

Bush is using Congress' authorization to use "all necessary and appropriate force" against terrorists as justification not only for bypassing FISA, but for the authority to name anyone an "enemy combatant" and to hold them indefinitely without trial until the "end of hostilities" (as if there could ever be an end to the "war on terrorism").

What is to prevent Bush from taking the next step and executing an "enemy combatant" for reasons that are to be determined at his discretion alone? Doesn't Gonzales' "justification" using the above-mentioned Congressional approval allow for the extreme action of taking away a life without any due process - so long as Bush deems it as necessary in the war on terrorism?

When are people going to wake up?

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network