Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Why Did Americans Turn Against War in Iraq So Quickly?
On the home front, at least, Iraq is no Vietnam, writes PNS contributor Sanford Gottlieb. In just two short years, American support for war in Iraq has waned. No missing WMD, several early, prominent war critics, more middle-of-the-road protesters than in Vietnam and even Hurricane Katrina helped turn the tide.
President Bush's public relations offensive against his anti-war critics is uphill work. Within two years, polls show, Americans soured on the Iraq War -- far more quickly than they did during Vietnam. Why?
--The rationale for invading Iraq began to unravel early; the Cold War mindset that fueled U.S. intervention in Vietnam remained intact.
During Vietnam most Americans believed the conflict was part of a global struggle against communism. By the time President Johnson committed combat troops to Vietnam in 1965, public attitudes had been shaped by 18 years of Cold War. The Soviet Union and "Red" China represented a fearsome threat, and the Vietnamese Communists, despite their nationalist history, were seen as tools of Moscow and Beijing. South Vietnam was viewed as a domino, first in a line, ready to fall. "If we don't fight them there," AFL-CIO President George Meany said, "we'll have to fight them in San Francisco." That mindset helped keep American troops in Vietnam for eight bloody years.
During Iraq, by contrast, the Bush administration claimed there was a mortal threat from an Iraqi dictator with weapons of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda. In 2002, President Bush conjured up the image of a mushroom cloud. On the eve of war, Vice President Dick Cheney asserted, "We believe (Saddam) has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." Colin Powell's address to the United Nations, which he now considers a blot on his record, was persuasive in 2003.
The administration disparaged pre-war U.N. inspectors who failed to find WMD, but after the invasion Bush could hardly dismiss identical reports by his own inspectors. The public, at first supportive of the war, began to question it.
--Prominent critics spoke up during the early stages of the Iraq War; they were mute for a long time during Vietnam.
Brent Scowcroft, former national security advisor for George Bush Sr., publicly questioned the Iraq War's premises from the start. Former antiterrorist chief Richard Clarke, retired Marine general Anthony Zinni, ex-ambassador Joseph Wilson and former State Department official Greg Thielmann protested aspects of the war policy in 2003-4. The seeds of doubt they planted sprouted later. Criticism from former officials continues. Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's long-time chief of staff, recently charged that the vice president and secretary of defense created a "Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal" that highjacked U.S. foreign policy.
More
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ee9f912c687c77bd8295b3ccaca77839
--The rationale for invading Iraq began to unravel early; the Cold War mindset that fueled U.S. intervention in Vietnam remained intact.
During Vietnam most Americans believed the conflict was part of a global struggle against communism. By the time President Johnson committed combat troops to Vietnam in 1965, public attitudes had been shaped by 18 years of Cold War. The Soviet Union and "Red" China represented a fearsome threat, and the Vietnamese Communists, despite their nationalist history, were seen as tools of Moscow and Beijing. South Vietnam was viewed as a domino, first in a line, ready to fall. "If we don't fight them there," AFL-CIO President George Meany said, "we'll have to fight them in San Francisco." That mindset helped keep American troops in Vietnam for eight bloody years.
During Iraq, by contrast, the Bush administration claimed there was a mortal threat from an Iraqi dictator with weapons of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda. In 2002, President Bush conjured up the image of a mushroom cloud. On the eve of war, Vice President Dick Cheney asserted, "We believe (Saddam) has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." Colin Powell's address to the United Nations, which he now considers a blot on his record, was persuasive in 2003.
The administration disparaged pre-war U.N. inspectors who failed to find WMD, but after the invasion Bush could hardly dismiss identical reports by his own inspectors. The public, at first supportive of the war, began to question it.
--Prominent critics spoke up during the early stages of the Iraq War; they were mute for a long time during Vietnam.
Brent Scowcroft, former national security advisor for George Bush Sr., publicly questioned the Iraq War's premises from the start. Former antiterrorist chief Richard Clarke, retired Marine general Anthony Zinni, ex-ambassador Joseph Wilson and former State Department official Greg Thielmann protested aspects of the war policy in 2003-4. The seeds of doubt they planted sprouted later. Criticism from former officials continues. Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's long-time chief of staff, recently charged that the vice president and secretary of defense created a "Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal" that highjacked U.S. foreign policy.
More
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ee9f912c687c77bd8295b3ccaca77839
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network