Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Should The New York Times Fire Judith Miller and Apologize to Readers?
On Sunday, Miller revealed that she spoke with Scooter Libby about undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame weeks before her name appeared in the press, but Miller claims she can't remember who leaked the name. Meanwhile it has been revealed Miller had a special Pentagon security clearance and was removed from covering Iraq and WMD stories by her editors. This weekend, The New York Times published its long awaited account of Judith Miller's involvement in the Valarie Plame affair. Miller, a New York Times reporter, was released from jail late last month after agreeing to testify before a grand jury investigating who in the Bush administration leaked the identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame.
The Times account revealed several new details about Miller's conversations with Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice-President Dick Cheney"s Chief of Staff. Libby and President Bush"s Senior advisor, Karl Rove, face possible indictiments for their roles in the affair.
Miller is claiming that she doesn't know who gave her Plame's name but admitted discussing her with Libby. Miller's notes reveal that she wrote the name "Valerie Flame" in the same notebook she used to interview Libby.
The Times report also makes clear that Miller initially believed that Libby"s Lawyer, Joseph Tate was sending her a message that Libby did not want her to testify and was seeking assurances that she would exonerate Libby.
The New York Times coverage also reveals that there has been wide discontent at the paper about its handling of the story and about Miller's reporting in general.
When asked what she regretted about the newspaper's handling of the Miller matter, managing editor Jill Abramson said "The entire thing."
In 2003 the paper's executive editor Bill Keller told Miller she could no longer cover Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. Miller had written several of the key articles that claimed Iraq had an extensive weapons of mass destruction program ahead of the Iraq invasion.
Miller even wrote in her own notes "W.M.D. -- I got it totally wrong. The analysts, the experts and the journalists who covered them -- we were all wrong. If your sources are wrong, you are wrong."
In today's Washington Post, a former colleague of Miller's revealed that he refused to work with her.
Craig Pyres - who now works with the Los Angeles Times - wrote a memo to his editors five years ago and asked that his byline not appear on one piece. Pyres wrote "I do not trust her work, her judgment, or her conduct. She is an advocate, and her actions threaten the integrity of the enterprise, and of everyone who works with her.... She has turned in a draft of a story of a collective enterprise that is little more than dictation from government sources over several days, filled with unproven assertions and factual inaccuracies."
Questions are also being raised about Miller's relationship not just with Libby but with the Pentagon.
Miller revealed in her article that she had a Pentagon security clearance while embedded with US military teams hunting for banned weapons in Iraq.
Retired CBS News correspondent Bill Lynch said, "This is as close as one can get to government licensing of journalists."
Lynch went on to write "Miller violated her duty to report the truth by accepting a binding obligation to withhold key facts the government deems secret, even when that information might contradict the reportable "facts.""
On the phone to talk with us about these latest developments is Michael Isikoff and Greg Mitchell.
* Michael Isikoff, investigative reporter with Newsweek. His latest article is about Karl Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin. It is titled "Karl Rove's Consigliore."
* Greg Mitchell, editor of Editor & Publisher. His most recent column is titled "After 'NY Times' Probe: Keller Should Fire Miller--and Apologize to Readers."
LISTEN ONLINE:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/17/1422250
Miller is claiming that she doesn't know who gave her Plame's name but admitted discussing her with Libby. Miller's notes reveal that she wrote the name "Valerie Flame" in the same notebook she used to interview Libby.
The Times report also makes clear that Miller initially believed that Libby"s Lawyer, Joseph Tate was sending her a message that Libby did not want her to testify and was seeking assurances that she would exonerate Libby.
The New York Times coverage also reveals that there has been wide discontent at the paper about its handling of the story and about Miller's reporting in general.
When asked what she regretted about the newspaper's handling of the Miller matter, managing editor Jill Abramson said "The entire thing."
In 2003 the paper's executive editor Bill Keller told Miller she could no longer cover Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. Miller had written several of the key articles that claimed Iraq had an extensive weapons of mass destruction program ahead of the Iraq invasion.
Miller even wrote in her own notes "W.M.D. -- I got it totally wrong. The analysts, the experts and the journalists who covered them -- we were all wrong. If your sources are wrong, you are wrong."
In today's Washington Post, a former colleague of Miller's revealed that he refused to work with her.
Craig Pyres - who now works with the Los Angeles Times - wrote a memo to his editors five years ago and asked that his byline not appear on one piece. Pyres wrote "I do not trust her work, her judgment, or her conduct. She is an advocate, and her actions threaten the integrity of the enterprise, and of everyone who works with her.... She has turned in a draft of a story of a collective enterprise that is little more than dictation from government sources over several days, filled with unproven assertions and factual inaccuracies."
Questions are also being raised about Miller's relationship not just with Libby but with the Pentagon.
Miller revealed in her article that she had a Pentagon security clearance while embedded with US military teams hunting for banned weapons in Iraq.
Retired CBS News correspondent Bill Lynch said, "This is as close as one can get to government licensing of journalists."
Lynch went on to write "Miller violated her duty to report the truth by accepting a binding obligation to withhold key facts the government deems secret, even when that information might contradict the reportable "facts.""
On the phone to talk with us about these latest developments is Michael Isikoff and Greg Mitchell.
* Michael Isikoff, investigative reporter with Newsweek. His latest article is about Karl Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin. It is titled "Karl Rove's Consigliore."
* Greg Mitchell, editor of Editor & Publisher. His most recent column is titled "After 'NY Times' Probe: Keller Should Fire Miller--and Apologize to Readers."
LISTEN ONLINE:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/17/1422250
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Friedman on Iraq—the “thinking” behind the New York Times’s debacle
Tue, Oct 25, 2005 7:38AM
Judith Miller and the New York Times—accomplices in a war based on lies
Tue, Oct 18, 2005 7:43AM
amazing . . .
Mon, Oct 17, 2005 9:36AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network