top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Media overlooked Dobson's "confidential" information on Miers

by media matters (reposted)
In reporting Focus on the Family founder and chairman James C. Dobson's announced support for Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers, various media outlets -- including the Associated Press and The Washington Post -- overlooked Dobson's October 5 statement that his support for the nomination was due, at least in part, to "confidential" information that he had been "privy to." The reports omitted Dobson's comments despite mentioning concerns from many other prominent conservatives that they don't know enough about Miers's views on social issues such as abortion. Dobson's purported inside information would be significant, because both Republican and Democratic critics of Miers have noted that she has a thin track record, having never served as a judge, and have expressed concern that she will follow the lead of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and refuse during her nomination hearing to shed light on her views on such hot-button issues as abortion rights. Even President Bush has dodged questions about whether he has asked Miers about her position on Roe v. Wade, the 1973 landmark decision protecting the right to abortion.
Some reporters apparently recognized the newsworthiness of Dobson's October 5 claim that the White House is providing some conservatives with information about Miers, which Dobson suggested was critical to his support, but not sharing it with senators or the public. On the October 5 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN congressional correspondent Ed Henry reported that Dobson "has basically said he's been assured that she [Miers] is pro-life." The New York Times reported on October 6 that Dobson stated that "he had been given confidential information about Ms. Miers's views," prompting Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-VT) to specifically ask Miers if she had authorized anyone to speak on her behalf. An October 6 report by USA Today that noted Leahy's concerns over Dobson's remarks also documented that Dobson made similar comments on Fox News on October 4:

Leahy, the top-ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said he asked Miers on Wednesday about statements by one of her conservative backers, Focus on the Family President James Dobson, who is strongly opposed to abortion. "I do know things that I am not prepared to talk about here," Dobson said of Miers' conservative credentials Tuesday on Fox News.

Yet several media outlets that did mention Dobson's stated support for Miers's nomination failed to report his cryptic comments regarding "confidential" information. A report by the Associated Press noted only that on his radio program Dobson "said he believes Miers is against abortion, based on information including talks with her friends." Similarly, while noting that one of the "main complaints" by conservatives about the nomination is "Miers's lack of track record," a front-page Washington Post report omitted any mention of the information Dobson claimed he received. The Boston Globe also did not mention Dobson's purported inside information in its October 6 report, which included him among the "high-profile conservatives" who are "standing by Bush's decision" to nominate Miers.

Other newspapers mentioned White House efforts to woo Dobson but did not report Dobson's claim that he received "confidential" information about Miers. For example, The Christian Science Monitor reported that Dobson came to support Miers "[a]fter extensive lobbying by the White House" but cited only Dobson's claim that Bush has earned trust because "[t]o this point," he has been consistent with his pledge "to appoint judges who will interpret the law rather than create it." The New York Sun reported (subscription required) that White House senior adviser Karl Rove "convinced" Dobson to support Miers, but did not suggest how he had done so.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200510060005
§Did Bush really say he had never talked with Miers about abortion?
by Media Matters (reposted)
Multiple news outlets have reported that during an October 4 press conference President Bush denied that he has ever spoken with Harriet Miers, whom he recently nominated to the Supreme Court, about abortion. In fact, Bush said no such thing; he may have started to say something to that effect, but he stopped himself in mid-sentence.

During the press conference, NBC White House correspondent Kelly O'Donnell asked Bush, "Have you ever discussed with Harriet Miers abortion? Or have you gleaned from her comments her views on that subject?" What ensued was an exchange between Bush and O'Donnell in which he gave answers that dodged the specific questions she was asking, as she tried repeatedly to pin him down. By the end of the exchange, Bush seemed on the verge of saying that he had never spoken about the subject with Miers but stopped short -- prompting O'Donnell to later report that Bush had been "notably cautious" in his response.

From the October 4 White House press conference:

BUSH: I have no litmus test. It's also something I've consistently said: There is no litmus test. What matters to me is her judicial philosophy; what does she believe the role -- the proper role of the judiciary is, relative to the legislative and the executive branch. And she'll be asked all kinds of questions up there, but the most important thing for me is what kind of judge will she be? And so there's no litmus tests.

O'DONNELL: Sir, you've already said there was no litmus test --

BUSH: Correct. And I'll say it again: There is no litmus test.

O'DONNELL: But she is not someone you interviewed for the job that you didn't know. You've known her a long time. Have you never discussed abortion with her?

BUSH: In my interviews with any judge, I never ask their personal opinion on the subject of abortion.

O'DONNELL: In your friendship with her, you've never discussed abortion?

BUSH: Not to my recollection have I ever sat down with her -- what I have done is understand the type of person she is and the type of judge she will be.

Bush's assertion that "In my interviews with any judge, I never ask their personal opinion on the subject of abortion" did not answer the question O'Donnell asked: "Have you never discussed abortion with her?" Although Bush did interview Miers, his answer would mean only that he never asked her about abortion in that interview; he has worked closely with her for years and would have had plenty of other opportunities to learn her beliefs on the subject. O'Donnell seemed aware that Bush has had many other opportunities to determine Miers's position on abortion, and asked the president whether in his friendship with Miers the subject had ever come up.

In the final portion of his answer, Bush seemed about to say that he has never discussed abortion with Miers, remarking, "Not to my recollection have I ever sat down with her." But Bush stopped short of saying what some in the media have reported that he said -- that he never discussed the issue with her. Instead, he said only, "what I have done is understand the type of person she is and the type of judge she will be."

Press reports go beyond Bush's statement

Reporting on her exchange with Bush on the October 4 edition of NBC's Nightly News, O'Donnell noted that Bush's response to her question had been "notably cautious":

O'DONNELL: Fifty-five minutes in the Rose Garden, more than a dozen different subjects, with one woman at the center.

[CLIP] BUSH: I don't have to guess and speculate about Harriet.

O'DONNELL: But even in the president's own party, many say Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers's views are unknown. So Mr. Bush used the "trust me" argument.

[CLIP] BUSH: I know her well enough to be able to say that she's not going to change, that 20 years from now, she'll be the same person with the same philosophy that she is today.

O'DONNELL: What is her philosophy on an issue like abortion?

[CLIP] BUSH: I have no litmus test.

O'DONNELL: With Miers, the president repeatedly stressed their years of close friendship. But when pressed, had they ever talked about abortion? He was notably cautious:

[CLIP] O'DONNELL: In your friendship with her, you've never discussed it?

BUSH: Not to my recollection have I ever sat down with her.

But numerous other reporters apparently heard more than Bush actually said. For instance, The New York Times wrote on October 5, "The president also said he did not recall ever talking to Ms. Miers, whom he has known for more than a decade, about her personal views on abortion, and he reiterated that he was a 'pro-life president' who nonetheless had no litmus test on the issue for judicial candidates." The Associated Press reported on October 5 that Bush "insist[ed] that he doesn't recall ever talking to Miers about abortion," and The Washington Post's report actually appended the missing words to Bush's quote: "And just as [Justice Clarence] Thomas told the Senate [during his confirmation hearings] that he never voiced a position on Roe even privately, Bush said he never talked about the topic with Miers. 'Not to my recollection have I ever sat down with her' to talk about abortion, he said."

Television and radio reports also mischaracterized Bush's remarks. For example, National Public Radio (NPR) White House correspondent Don Gonyea reported on the October 4 broadcast of All Things Considered that "the president says he doesn't know where Miers stands on abortion." On the October 5 edition of CNN's American Morning, national correspondent Bob Franken reported that "when pressed, the president said that even though he has known Harriet Miers a long time, he could not recall ever speaking to her about abortion."

Several other reporters besides O'Donnell provided a more accurate representation of what Bush said --and didn't say -- in the press conference. On the October 4 broadcast of the CBS Evening News, chief White House correspondent John Roberts preceded Bush's remark by reporting that "President Bush wasn't giving anything on what he knew from their personal relationship." Similarly, an October 5 report in the Los Angeles Times noted that Bush "sidestepped questions about whether he and Miers ever discussed her views on abortion":

He [Bush] also sidestepped questions about whether he and Miers ever discussed her views on abortion, saying instead that he had "no litmus test" for the nomination. "In my interviews with any judge, I never ask their personal opinion on the subject of abortion," Bush said.

Asked if the subject had come up in more informal conversation, he said, "Not to my recollection have I ever sat down with her."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200510050008
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network