From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
"Defective or Manipulated," Says U.S. Senator About WMD Intelligence
Outspoken comments from segments of the U.S. government have been casting doubts on the Bush administration's evidence of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction…….
CHICAGO (NFTF.org) -- As the world awaits the Bush administration to unveil Saddam Hussein's massive quantities of weapons of mass destruction, doubts over U.S. evidence within the United States government are beginning to surface.
In his State of the Union Address, U.S. President Bush argued that Iraq was capable of producing "over 25,000 liters of anthrax ... more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin ... the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent ... had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents." Yet, to date, none of these accusations have been proven.
But in recent days, outspoken comments from segments of the U.S. government have been casting doubts on the Bush administration's evidence of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof argued today that the Bush administration "souped up intelligence, leaned on spooks to change their conclusions and concealed contrary information to deceive people at home and around the world."
Kristof points to how the Bush administration used phony and forged documents attempting to show that Saddam Hussein had tried to buy uranium from Niger.
Senator Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico raised similar concerns: "The intelligence that our officials was given regarding W.M.D. was either defective or manipulated."
In his State of the Union Address, U.S. President Bush argued that Iraq was capable of producing "over 25,000 liters of anthrax ... more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin ... the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent ... had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents." Yet, to date, none of these accusations have been proven.
But in recent days, outspoken comments from segments of the U.S. government have been casting doubts on the Bush administration's evidence of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof argued today that the Bush administration "souped up intelligence, leaned on spooks to change their conclusions and concealed contrary information to deceive people at home and around the world."
Kristof points to how the Bush administration used phony and forged documents attempting to show that Saddam Hussein had tried to buy uranium from Niger.
Senator Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico raised similar concerns: "The intelligence that our officials was given regarding W.M.D. was either defective or manipulated."
For more information:
http://www.NewsFromTheFront.org
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
where the fuck was kristof BEFORE the war? writing pro-war editorials...
there were numerous articles BEFORE the war recounting the pressure put on c.i.a. analysts to skew their analysis.
oh, so now AFTER the war is over, AFTER america get's it's foot in iraq's door, it's o.k. to have the whole fucking case against iraq collapse like the house of cards it was.
these bastards. in the media and the government. so blatant, and they don't care if you know...