Picture This: A scenario for the New World Order (Bills C24, C35, C36, and C42) : Indybay

<h3>PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY</h3>

<h4>Picture this:</h4>

You receive a letter in the mail to report for a mandatory vaccination. You are on the list of groups that are being targeted for forced-inoculation. You ask around your neighborhood and nobody else has recieved such a letter. You call around to friends and family and only one or two others have also been given this order.

You question why. You call the number provided on the letter and you are told that there is an "outbreak" of some disease and that you are ordered to report or face prison and possibly a forced vaccination in jail. There is nothing that you can do.

SOUND CRAZY??…..IT’S BECOMING REALITY…..

Under Bill C42, it will be legally mandatory to accept anything the government wants to inject inside of you. If you protest against this you might be labelled a terrorist under Bill C36 for interferring with an "essential public service". If you refuse, the police can invoke measures under Bill C24 to break the law in any way that they see fit to deal with the situation. If you plan a protest outside a government meeting, the area might be classified as a "military zone" under Bill C35 and anyone caught inside of this zone can be arrested as a terrorist. Again, you don't know what the police will do to you in custody because they are now allowed to break the law in anyway they see fit under Bill C24.

<h4>Welcome to the NEW CANADA!! Welcome to the NEW WORLD ORDER!!</h4>

<h4The time to act is NOW before it is too late!</h4>

http://www.canadianliberty.bc.ca 

(Note: the situation in the United States is exactly the same under the new legislation-->> please read below)

________________________________________________________________

http://www.hamilton.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=971&group=webcast 

<h2>Forced vaccinations coming to Canada: MP Speaks Out Against Bill C-42</h2>

<h3>Global Justice Network, Vancouver, BC</h3>

 Bill C-42(R), called the Public Safety Act (or by others the New and Improved War Measures Act ), amends numerous other Acts of Canada including The Department of Health Act, the Quarantine Act, the Food and Drug Act, and the Hazardous Products Act among others.

The Bill has been tabled as part of new anti-terrorism legislation, along with Bill C-35, and Bill C-36
(Note: gives new interim powers to the various Ministers in charge of the various Act; powers that have previously been in the hands of the courts, who have an obligation to respect the rule of law and consider impartially the rights of Canadians under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The potential effect of such interim powers were brought up by Bloc Quebecois MP Mario Laframboise in the House of Commons December 3, 2001:

I can perhaps try to explain, to help Quebecers listening to us to better understand the new powers that would be given to the Health Minister. It is quite simple:

11.1 (1) The Minister may make an interim order that contains any provision that may be contained in a regulation made under section 11 if the Minister believes that immediate action is required to deal with a significant risk, direct or indirect, to health or safety.
Hence, by way of an interim order, a new power has been given to the Health Minister. In the case of the anthrax vaccine or the protective inoculation, this power would have entailed the Minister to give his officials the power to buy the necessary vaccine and to compel every Canadian to receive it.

These new dispositions all give more powers and this is what makes it so serious. It is not done simply by giving the minister more powers, because we do not simply give him more powers, we tell him that now an interim order is exempt from the application of sections 3, 5 and 11 of the Statutory Instruments Act.

This means that the minister could adopt interim orders for all sorts of emergency purposes and be exempt from the application of sections of the Statutory Instruments Act. And I am not talking about any old section, either. I will read a part of section 3, which would no longer apply to the Minister of Health in the case of interim orders.

This section states:

3. (1) Subject to any regulations made pursuant to paragraph 20(a), where a regulation-making authority proposes to make a regulation, it shall cause to be forwarded to the Clerk of the Privy Council three copies of the proposed regulation in both official languages.
Now, it would no longer be necessary to send them in both official languages. I read on:

(2) On receipt by the Clerk of the Privy Council of copies of a proposed regulation pursuant to subsection (1), the Clerk of the Privy Council, in consultation with the Deputy Minister of Justice, shall examine the proposed regulation to ensure that
(a) it is authorized by the statute pursuant to which it is to be made;
(b) it does not constitute an unusual or unexpected use of the authority pursuant to which it is to be made;
(c) it does not trespass unduly on existing rights and freedoms and is not, in any case, inconsistent with the purposes and
provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

If the Minister of Health is empowered to make interim orders, to purchase vaccines, of whatever kind, exempt from the application of the provisions of enabling legislation, he could very well acquire unacceptable vaccines, vaccines whose patents are held elsewhere. This is no problem. He could then require a group to be vaccinated without complying with the charter of rights and freedoms. All this is effective for 23 days. After 23 days, the regulation must be published.

If this does not infringe individual rights and freedoms, I do not know what they can be thinking. If the minister had all these powers, why write in black and white in a bill that, now, he will be able to make interim orders without the House or the usual regulatory procedure requiring him to meet the test of the charter of rights and freedoms.

The entire text of this speech in the House of Commons can be obtained at: http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/chambus/house/debates/123_2001-12-03/HAN123-E.htm#Int-102138. This legislation is similar to the US Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.

Health Scientist and Government Cover-up Investigator Dr. Len Horowitz claims in his article that the CDC advances Totalitarian Legislation Under Guise of Public Health : Forced Drugging and Injections Are On The Horizon that forced vaccinations will soon be authorized in the United States under this proposed Act, a copy of which can be found at http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA.pdf.

One such amendment allows the Minister of Transport to declare temporary military zones for up to one year, without adherence to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Section 260.1 (1) of this Bill reads ,
If it is necessary, in the opinion of the Minister, for the protection of international relations or national defence or security, the Minister, on the recommendation of the Chief of the Defence Staff, may, for the purpose of ensuring the safety or security of any person or thing, designate as a military security zone an area of land or water, a portion of airspace, or a structure or part of one, surrounding a thing referred to in subsection (2) or including it, whether the zone designated is fixed or moves with that thing. The zone automatically includes all corresponding water and land below the earth's surface.

This military zone may be designated to protect, includes property, a place or thing that the Canadian Forces have been directed to protect in order to fulfil a duty required by law. This could apply to the Kananaskis location of the upcoming G8 meeting, or any other area where the government wished to restrict legitimate protest and dissent. Under (4) The Canadian Forces may prohibit, restrict or control access to a military security zone ; and under (5) A person found in a military security zone without authorization, and any animal, vehicle, vessel, aircraft or other thing under the person's control, may be forcibly removed by any authorized person, officer or non-commissioned member.

Furthermore, with the recent passage of Bill C-24 (otherwise known as the Police Brutality Act ) which is an Act to amend the Criminal Code, public officers and their agents are now exempt from criminal charges under certain and very broad conditions. This Bill was passed by the Senate on December 6, 2001, despite a plethora of credible witnesses' testimony of the dangers of this Bill.

The Canadian Bar Association's National Criminal Justice Section says sweeping changes in Bill C-24, will place law enforcement personnel and their agents above the law. "We are opposed to this profound change to the law out of respect for Canadian constitutional guarantees and the rule of law," says Heather Perkins-McVey, of Ottawa, National Criminal Justice Section Chair. The legislation would allow police and even agents of the police to commit serious criminal acts without appropriate accountability, a move the CBA vigorously opposes. "Certainly, police must have the tools they need to do their job. However, creating a criminal exemption for police and their agents will create the possibility of a justice system prone to abuse and misuse of power," says Ms. Perkins-McVey (see CBA Opposes Putting Police above the Law).

For instance, public officers who engage in or direct acts that would otherwise constitute an offense under the Criminal Code can now claim immunity under Section 25.1 if they were: engaged in the investigation of an offence under, or the enforcement of, an Act of Parliament (ie Protection of foreign delegates under C-35 at an international G8 conference or acting under the interim orders of a Minister under C-42) and they believe on reasonable grounds that the commission of the act or omission is reasonable and proportional in the circumstance. (This is left to the officer's discretion).

Although the public officer is normally required to obtain written authorization from a senior official, provision is made for the officer to undertake virtually any criminal offense on reasonable grounds that they COULD get such authorization.

The evidence is mounting that democracy is now a farce in Canada, as it is in the United States, and that dictatorial power now resides in the Prime Minister and his select group of Ministers. Please take the time to write Senators and Members of Parliament.

Time to click on the link and tell the folks in Ottawa how you feel about having someone inject something into "your" body that may kill you!

http://www.candianliberty.bc.ca 

Not only might these vaccinations physically harm you, WHAT ELSE CAN BE INSIDE OF THEM??

Well…..the answer is….WHATEVER THE HELL GOVERNMENTS AND CORPORATIONS WANT TO PUT IN YOU!!

Possibilities?? 
<ul><li>This was found at the Maxwell Air Force Base website: "Implanting 'things' in people raises ethical and public relations issues.112 While these concerns may be founded on today's thinking, in 2025 they may not be as alarming. We already are evolving toward technology implanting. For example, the military currently requires its members to receive mandatory injections of biological organisms (i.e., the flu shot). In the civilian world, people receive mechanical hearts and other organs. Society has come to accept most of these implants as a fact of life. By 2025 it is possible medical technology will have nerve chips that allow amputees to control artificial limbs or eye chips that allow the blind to see.113 The civilian populace will likely accept an implanted microscopic chips that allow military members to defend vital national interests. Further, the US military will continue to be a volunteer force that will freely accept the chip because it is a tool to control technology and not as a tool to control the human." [Ya right…and we’re supposed to believe that!!] Shocking? Unbelievable? Well, we now know that these things are being considered and developed. How long until this finds its way into MANDATORY VACCINATIONS??</li>

<li>What about population control? Well, when considering the Bush family connection to the Skull and Bones Society and their belief in eugenics and depopulation (genocide, as practiced with the sanctions against Iraq -- responsible for over 2 million Iraqi deaths), it is not far-fetched to extrapolate to see the global implications of their murderous policies. Is it possible that mandatory vaccinations are part of some sort of population control agenda? Check out this out: "Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare delivers the most heretical message in the annals of world health and American medicine, backed by the most astonishing hard-hitting documents ever revealed. Here, veteran investigator, Dr. Len Horowitz, the award-winning author of the national bestseller, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional? relays how and why populations are being insidiously victimized. Exquisitely detailed in this book are the most advanced developments in the field of population control. Genetically engineered viruses and bacteria, the latest technologies for biological warfare, and combined exposures to biochemical, metallic, and electromagnetic agents, offer a "Star Wars"-like arsenal for conducting global genocide auspiciously for "public health", "National Security", and "world peace". Reprinted here are the most stunning U.S. Government documents you have ever seen that vividly expose the secret agendas of war waging by the world's wealthiest colonialists."</li></ul>

<h3>ORGANIZE NOW BEFORE WE ARE SUBJECT TO A GLOBAL FASCIST DICTATORSHIP AND EVEN WORSE!! SAY NO TO LEGISLATION SUCH AS CANADA’S BILL C42</h3>

Picture This: A scenario for the New World Order (Bills C24, C35, C36, and C42)

Donate

Get Involved

Publish