top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

"Fear and Loathing at Philadelphia's BattleCry" article by Sunsara Taylor

by blackeye1776
... the president of the United States sent a letter of support, greeting, prayer, and encouragement to the BattleCry event held at Wachovia Spectrum Stadium in Philadelphia on May 12. Immediately afterwards, a preacher took the mic and led the crowd to pray. Among other things, he asked them to “Thank god for giving us George Bush.”

...Some of the youths said it was OK that Bush’s lies have killed thousands--because God put Bush in power...
Fear and Loathing at Philadelphia's BattleCry
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060513_battlecry_philadelphia/
Posted on May 13, 2006

By Sunsara Taylor

It began with fireworks so loud and startling I screamed. Lights and smoke followed and a few kids were pulled up on stage from the crowd. One was asked to read a letter.

This was the letter that opened the event. Its author was George Bush. Yes, the president of the United States sent a letter of support, greeting, prayer, and encouragement to the BattleCry event held at Wachovia Spectrum Stadium in Philadelphia on May 12. Immediately afterwards, a preacher took the mic and led the crowd to pray. Among other things, he asked them to “Thank god for giving us George Bush.”

On his cue, about 17,000 youths from upwards of 2,000 churches across America and Canada directed their thanks heavenward in unison.

Throughout the three-and-a-half hours of BattleCry’s first session, there was only one analogy that fit the experience: This must have been what it felt like to watch the Hitler Youth, filled with self-righteous pride, proclaim the supremacy of their beliefs and their willingness to shed blood for them.


And lest you think this is idle paranoia, BattleCry founder Ron Luce told the crowds the next morning (May 13) that he plans to launch a “blitzkrieg” in the communities, schools, malls, etc. against those who don’t share his theocratic vision of society.

Blitzkrieg.

Nothing like a little Nazi imagery to whip up the masses.

But back to the first rally on May 12. Shortly after sitting down, an imposingly-sized man named Tom, who appeared to be BattleCry security, sat down next to me and my friends, and asked us if we were planning any disturbances. I don’t know how BattleCry & Co. knew I was here, but they had apparently recognized me from my appearance on The O’Reilly Factor in March. I told Tom that we weren’t planning any disturbances, and that no, I wouldn’t like to meet with Luce after the rally, nor did I want to give him my phone number. Seemingly satisfied, he ambled off. But later on, as I rose to go to the bathroom, I caught sight of Tom following me. It was very unsettling, to say the least.

(While in the bathroom, I saw something equally unsettling--a pre-teen girl wearing a shirt being sported by many attendees that night: Jesus on the cross, robes waving, and emblazoned across the front, the words “Dressed to Kill.”)

After my bathroom break, Tom, my helpful minder, was replaced by an eerily-cheerful young woman who was also obviously BattleCry personnel. She claimed to be simply making sure that my friends and I were happy. She would stop by several times over the course of the concert. I wonder if all attendees got that kind of VIP treatment.

But onto the show.


The first rock band that sang, Delirious, got the crowd festive and up on their feet with lyrics that were also projected on the large screens so that everyone could join in:

“We’re and army of God and we’re ready to die…Let’s paint this big ol’ town red…We see nothing but the blood of Jesus…”

In between musical acts, Luce, the BattleCry founder, hammered away at the dominant theme of the night: his contention that “pew-sitters…passive Christians…the Christians who just want love, joy, peace…” were the problem, and that the world needed more radical and extreme god-worshippers—those who would be obedient and fully submit to Christ.

Luce would have us believe that everything went off track when the Bible-toting people of my grand-parents’ generation were replaced by the “pew-sitters” of the Baby Boom generation. These are the people who, according to Luce, just wanted to passively benefit from the “love, joy and peace” message of Christianity without actively surrendering their wills and their selves completely upon Christ’s altar and working in His name.

Yeah, if only people would stop practicing “love, joy and peace.” Wouldn’t that make the world a better place…

Luce used this critique of pew-sitting Christians to assuage the doubts of the youths at the rally who may have been feeling uncertain about their commitment to the Church. ‘Don’t worry,’ he was telling them, ‘you’ve been amongst pew-sitters--watered-down Christians. Welcome to the reign of total submission to the Lord.’

It was a mantra Luce repeated all through the night: the need to submit one’s self fully to Jesus, to belong completely to Him.

“He doesn’t just want to be in your heart, He wants to own your heart…There’s only one good reason to come to Christ: because He’s the rightful owner of your life.” “You don’t have to know much about Jesus, just enough to surrender your whole life.”

Throughout this section, a loud crowd from the back of the stadium would periodically erupt, “We are warriors!”

Some of the youths said it was OK that Bush’s lies have killed thousands--because God put Bush in power.

After tugging at countless emotional strings, Ron insisted – with the humility of Taliban members who submit to “Allah’s command to stone adulterers” – “You are the one talking to God, I am just going to help you with the words.”

There was a session when, after a great crescendo, the stadium was brought to silence. Ron instructed individuals to stand up when they felt the spirit and cry out, “I want the cross!” The voices of hundreds rose up over the course of 10 minutes. These young people, declaring death unto themselves and re-birth in Christ, were called down to the floor of the stadium, directed to get down on their knees, and to put their heads down and pray some more.

Luce put great emphasis on following every word in the Bible, treating it as an “instruction book,” even when a person doesn’t understand or agree. This is, of course, the the logic that leads to the stoning of gays, non-virgin brides, disobedient children and much more –because the Bible says so.

Interesting enough, it seems that not even Luce has faith in that admonition. During the afternoon preceding the first rally on May 12, Luce and about 300 BattleCry acolytes (almost entirely youths) rallied in front of Philadelphia’s Constitution Hall—the location having been chosen because Luce wants to “restore” the Founding Fathers’ vision of a religious society (never mind that the Founders enshrined in the Constitution an explicitly secular framework of government).

I and about 20 people representing various anti-Bush, atheistic and anti-Iraq war factions made our way into the rally and began interacting with the youths assembled. Some said openly that it was OK that George Bush’s lives have cost the lives of thousands of Americans and Iraqis. Why was it OK? Because “God put him [Bush] there.”

We then decided to ask them a little about this God, and his “instruction book,” as Luce calls it. Specifically, we asked them if they supported the parts of Deuteronomy and Leviticus that spell out, for example, death sentences for women who dare to enter the city while menstruating. The most memorable response came from Luce himself. (We were standing face to face in the plaza—he had recognized me from my O’Reilly appearance.)

“This is your Bible,” I told him. “You have to defend this.”

He smiled, smugly, and almost looked taken aback that I would challenge him like this.

“You can’t defend this,” I continued.

A Biblical literalist, Luce couldn’t disavow something in his “instruction book,” but neither did he want to appear (I imagine) to condone Iron-age barbary. So he stayed quiet, until, after I prodded him further, he changed the subject.

“Why are you so angry?” he asked.

My point made, I walked away.
by David Baloche
The reason Ron didn't defend the Bible is because he didn't want to argue with you. Watching you on O'Reilly helped me to understand why he wouldn't want to bicker with you since you wouldn't allow him to say anything before you came in with random things that President Bush has done. He knows the Bible very well and has written books on his studies. I asure you if he would have felt that the "conversation" between you and him would have been productive, you would might have a decent point. But nobody wants to argue with a brick wall who won't move no matter what you say to it.

"A person convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."
by to mr. baloche
Gee have you tried arguing with Battle Cry supporter Jerry Falwell lately? Why do you suppose he blamed gays and feminists for 9/11? I'd like to hear you argue about that one...
by That's a tuffy
How do you answer that???? I like it when the truth hits home hard.
by yall are some crazy kids!
Since WHEN did 9/11 get blamed on gays and whatnot? this is new to me... maybe you are gay and just blaming yourself for 9/11... the world will never know...
by Amanda
First, let me clarify one point that seems to be repeatedly made. Falwell did make a statement that would seem accusatory toward certain groups of people, yes. I have read his statement. I have also read another statement he made, taken directly from CNN.com, "Falwell told CNN: 'I would never blame any human being except the terrorists, and if I left that impression with gays or lesbians or anyone else, I apologize.'

Now, having said that, let me also make it clear that I am not a great fan of Jerry Falwell, and never have been, but I am what some would refer to as a "Bible literalist" or even a "evangelical Christian fundamentalist." Yes, I embrace these terms because I fully understand what they mean, and I know that Falwell has his faults just as I and any living human being does. I know that 9/11 happened not because of any one group of people, but because of man in general. I know from my Bible study that in the beginning, the world was created perfectly, as a place for man to live in fellowship with God, for His pleasure. Then, man messed it all up. God gave us a wonderful gift--the gift of free will--and man allowed himself to be deceived and actively disobeyed God. The consequences of this act of disobedience is still being felt, and because of the original sin, the world has become a place of war, death, and disease. The blame rests on us ALL.

I also attended the Philadelphia Battlecry event myself. I was there for both days, including the rally Ms. Taylor attended, and from what I have read, Ms. Taylor seems to have a tendency to use statements made at the events out of context, much in the same way that I have seen her use Bible verses out of context. I will honestly state that there was indeed some visual imagery I personally did not approve of; however, I do understand the metaphor intended to speak directly and plainly to the youth of today. The thought did cross my mind when the Navy SEALs came in that to someone who did not understand the intended metaphor, our purpose and message could seem overtly militant, and I understand the confusion that could arise from such imagery.

In addition, let me also point out that never, EVER, at any time has Ron Luce or ANY BIBLICAL CHRISTIAN ever suggested to any young person or any other that it is God's plan or desire to murder, stone, hurt or kill another individual simply because of their lifestyle. (I know, to this some will point to the instances in the Old Testament of the Bible in which God led his people into battle, and will throw President Bush into the fire and say, "Oh, he is a killer and his Christian buddies are just like him." Please do not jump to conclusions--hear what I am saying.) What this requires of the individual is understanding of God's purpose of that time, His established covenant, and how that is related to His existing covenant of mercy through Jesus Christ. Anyone, any time can play "Bible Roulette," choosing a verse of the Bible at random and contorting it to the point that it no longer resembles its true meaning taken IN CONTEXT. People do it all the time, every day. Nothing new.

In other words, it is like the saying, "It's not what you say, but how you say it."

As far as President Bush is concerned, I do not pretend to know everything. I cannot know everything about everyone, nor can you. Here is what I do know: he claims to be a Christian; the Bible clearly states that authority is given to leaders (Democrat, Republican, or otherwise) from God (John 19:11); I am to submit to these leaders and pray for God's guidance for them; Bush did not bring war into the world, nor can he remove it. Man brought it in, and God will ultimately triumph and take it out. No one else will.

I find this discussion fascinating, and would be glad to calmly and intelligently discuss these issues, without personal attacks. Lord, I pray that whomever reads this will hear your words, not my own. Amen.
by Never submit
To blindly submit to our chimpanzee in-chief is shameful.
This is what religions (esp. Christianity) have served to do historically--subjugate the masses. The question to be asked is: Who benefits from this?
Certainly not the people choosing to ignore democratic principles and not question authority. Bush is a disgrace to the human race and I'd be happy to provide ALOT of information to support this should you express interest...
If you take the bible literally, doesn't it advocate stoning people and slavery?
by Amanda
I think part of the problem lies in the use of the term, "submit." Correct me if I am wrong, but I think you are viewing the act of submission as a bad thing or a weakness all the time, under any circumstances. I would say that I disagree, and the necessity of submission is at the heart of true Christianity.

Please don't misunderstand. I do not dare to say that people should submit themselves willingly to harm, for example, to personal abuse by others. God gave us the ability to think and reason and cherishes us as His children. He expects us to be good stewards of these gifts (our body and mind) He gave us, as they still belong to Him (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

Now, going back to the original sin of Adam and Eve, when man separated himself from fellowship from God, the world became difficult. Over time, mankind has gotten itself into quite a mess, wouldn't you agree? It is because of this that man's inherent nature is sinful. We instinctively want to do whatever is gratifying to our bodies at the moment. This is not always the best thing for us, and sometimes we suffer consequences from sinful actions. This is why submission, in a LOVING, OBEDIENT sense is crucial to a Christian. Our submission to God's word keeps a whole lot of suffering out of our lives (Romans 6). I know, I have been on the other side and had a lot of hurt because I refused to submit to my heavenly Father. I submit to God, not to man. And if I disagree with another Christian, if I see that his actions are going against the word of God, it is my duty to tell him so (2 Thessalonians 3:14-15). However, because of God's gift of free will, I cannot control what anyone else will do with the truth.

As far as your question about the Bible advocating stoning and slavery the answer is a resounding, "NO!"

In the Old Testament, the law of Moses (established by God) ordered that certain sins were to be punishable by a stoning death, this is true. This is under the old covenant God made with the Jews to establish his rule among them. Under the Old Testament covenant, sin was atoned through the shedding of blood, and God was using the law to teach His chosen people the seriousness of a relationship with Him. Because of God's mercy, He sent his Son to be the one, last, ultimate sacrifice to fulfill the law He established. Christ, God in the flesh, died so that we would no longer have to shed blood to have our sins forgiven. The best example in the Bible that stoning is NOT a Christian way of life is found in John 8:3-11.

As far as slavery goes (slavery defined as one man "owning" another man), the Bible does speak directly to the issue because slavery was a common practice in the day and time the books of the Bible were written. However, the Bible does not advocate the practice as a good thing. In fact, you will find the opposite in 1 Timothy 1:8-11.

The Bible does refer to people as "slaves" in a spiritual sense, "slaves" to Christ, and "slaves" to sin. The use of the word here is metaphorical in context (1 Corinthians 7:22-23).

I hope this answers your question.

Dear Lord, thank you for this opportunity to speak with others about your word. I see that I am learning so much from this discussion. Amen.
by Just pathetic
" the Bible clearly states that authority is given to leaders (Democrat, Republican, or otherwise) from God (John 19:11)"{

This is a perfect example of blind faith, based on???????
You who do not question authority are pathetic.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$215.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network