Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
consipiracy theory
led from a cave
TO ALL THE CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORISTS
… who believe in the official cockamamie story that 19 Islamic fundamentalists, led by Osama Bin Laden, holed up in some cave in Afghanistan, figured out how out-smart the most sophisticated intelligence organizations (NSA, CIA, FBI, etc.) on the face of the planet. Remember the official story, by definition, is nothing more than a conspiracy theory, which is severely lacking in corroborating physical evidence.
If you don’t feel like reading any more, but are interested learning what the government, 9/11 commission, and the mainstream media will not tell you, the best video I have seen to date regarding the events of 9/11 is “Loose Change, 2nd Edition” by Dylan Avery:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
First, I will start with the FACT that there are several former or current high-up governmental officials who have stated that the official simply does not add up, and at the very least, the government allowed the attacks to take place, and some are even stating that 9/11 was conducted by a faction within the government itself
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas.
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney of Georgia.
Morgan Reynolds, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush’s first term Morgan Reynolds.
Paul Craig Roberts, former Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, a former assistant secretary of the treasury in the Reagan Administration.
George Galloway, Member of U.K. Parliament.
Michael Meacher, former senior member of the Blair government.
Second the FACT the tower collapsed at free-fall speeds, which by itself, totally disproves the official explanation of how/why the twin towers collapsed, and thus casts serious, I mean serious, doubt on the official story that Al-Qaeda was solely behind the attacks. Using the equations of one-dimensional kinematics, which have been established (and accepted by all western scientists) since the time on Isaac Newton in the early 1700s, I will calculate that amount of time it would take an object to hit the ground that was dropped from the top of the two towers.
Constants:
gravity (g) = 32 ft/s^2
h1 = height of North Tower = 1368 ft
h2 = height of South Tower = 1362 ft
Equations for an object starting at rest undergoing free-fall:
Distance = (1/2) * (gravity) * (time squared)
d = (1/2) * g * (t^2)
For the North Tower:
h1 = (1/2) * g * (t1^2)
2 * h1 / g = t1^2
t1 = sqrt (2 * h1 / g)
t1 = sqrt (2 * 1368 / 32)
t1 = 9.25 seconds
For the South Tower:
h2 = (1/2) * g * (t2^2)
2 * h2 / g = t2^2
t2 = sqrt (2 * h1 / g)
t2 = sqrt (2 * 1362 / 32)
t2 = 9.23 seconds
Officially the North Tower collapsed in approximately 10 seconds, and the South Tower collapsed in 8 seconds.
The official explanation is something like:
The structural integrity of the floor(s) hit by the airplanes was significantly weakened due to the subsequent fire. Then the weight to the tower above the impact location, cause those floor(s) to collapse, which set-off a chain reaction where the upper part of the tower pancaked down onto the lower floors collapsing one-by-one. Now I am not a physicist, but I know enough physics to know that the upper part of the tower would have encountered friction/resistance to its downward motion as it crashed through each of the lower floors. Flight 11 hit the North Tower at approximately floor 90. Flight 175 hit the South Tower at approximately floor 80. Now conservatively lets say the each floor slowed the decent of the upper part of the tower by only .1 seconds, so we can estimate that the North Tower should have collapsed in 18.25 seconds (9.25 sec + 90 * 0.1 sec) and the South Tower should have collapsed in 17.23 seconds (9.23 sec + 80 * 0.1 sec). These times are significantly greater that recorded collapse times. So the only way that the tower would have collapsed at these speeds would be for the floors below the impact zone to be blown out with explosives just ahead of the fall the upper part of the tower, so that it would not encounter any resistance and thus could descend at free-fall speeds. In other words, the top of the towers would have reached the ground in the same amount of time (as the official collapse times), if the part of the tower below the airplane impact suddenly vaporized out of existence and then the upper part of the town fell to the ground.
Then on top of this, we have tapes of radio transmissions from firefighters in the towers reporting several explosions far below the where the plane impacted the towers, as well as interviews with firefighters who state there were explosion going off as the towers started to fall.
Also the Official Explanation states there were intense infernos fueled by the kerosene of the crashed airplane that covered the floors in the impact zone, and they burned from the time of impact until the towers collapsed. But then how were the people standing in the holes in the towers where the airplanes crashed (there are numerous pictures of people standing in the holes of both towers) able to survive with the intense infernos burning hot enough to significantly weaken the steel infrastructure of the towers. Here is an excellent proof using the Laws of Thermodynamics showing that there is no way there was enough jet fuel to have significantly weaken the steel structure of the tower:
http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064
Apparently, these fires also burned hot enough to have destroyed the Black Boxes (made from some of the most indestructible material on the face of the planet) from the crashed airplanes, since officially no Black Boxes were recovered. But somehow a passport (made out of flimsy substance know as paper that ignites at 451 degrees F) of one of the hijackers survives almost completely unscathed.
And then what about WTC 7, did you know that it collapsed later in the afternoon on September 11, even though it was not hit with an airplane nor falling debris from the collapses of the towers. In fact there were several buildings closer to WTC 1 and 2, one of which was actually struck by falling debris, which did not collapse. The official explanation for the collapse, was due to fire, but anyone who has seen a video of the collapse of WTC 7 would have a hard time believing that it was not brought down by explosives, as it is a picture perfect instance of controlled demolition. Physicist Steven E. Jones from BYU does an excellent job covering the physics of the collapse of WTC 7 at:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Some skeptics then might say, well if it were true that explosions brought down the towers, then the steel in the rumble should show evidence of that. But unfortunately Mayor Gulliani had all the scrap metal immediately removed from Ground Zero and shipped to China for refurbishing. Now all you watchers of the CSIs and the Law & Orders should say hey wait a second, that was the biggest crime scene in US history, nothing should be removed and least of all destroyed before it has properly been investigated. However, in spite of this attempted destruction of all the physical evidence, there were reports of molten metal below the rumble as long a month after 9/11. Now jet fuel (kerosene) at it hottest burns at 1300 degrees F, but steel does not melt until 3000 degrees F. Maybe the Islamic Terrorist filled their hijacked aircraft with “magic” jet fuel that burns hot enough to melt steel.
Isn’t it funny how the so-called skeptic who vehemently oppose all the so-called conspiracy theories, get really pissed-off at anyone who questions the official explanation, calling them un-American or un-Patriotic or using some sort of expletive to describe them (because of course as everyone knows, people who use profanity obviously know what they are talking about), but do not actually provide any physical evidence to support their own conspiracy theory. The problem with these so-called skeptics is that they are not skeptical at all when it comes to the official story, and will irrationally accept any explanation (no matter how crazy) put forth by the government and the mainstream media. But when faced with anything that goes contrary to that mainstream explanation, they switch from being irrationally accepting to being irrationally skeptical, and it seems like no matter how much physical evidence they are presented with, they are steadfast in their belief of the official conspiracy theory.
If you still believe the official Neo-Con (or we might as well call them Neo-Facist or Neo-Nazi) explanation for the events that transpired on 9/11, rather that Laws of Kinematics that have been established and accepted since Isaac Newton in the early 1700s, then you might as well stamp a bar-code on your forehead, implant a tracking microchip, and set your time machine to 1984. Or maybe Osama Bin Laden and his posse holed up in a cave in Afghanistan, figured out how to defy not only the laws of physics, but also how to defy death, since at least 7 of the supposed 19 hijackers are still alive as reported by the BBC. Maybe that is easier to accept than the terrorism that is going on right under our noses, orchestrated by the very people to claim to be our saviors.
BUT SERIOUSLY, DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, do your own research and draw your own conclusions. What a novel concept, thinking for oneself. When is the last time you heard the government or the mainstream media telling you to think for yourself. Wow, I must be a crazy Anti-American conspiracy theorist telling people to question the government and think for themselves. I sincerely love this country, our Republic (remember we are a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy), and our Constitution, and that is why I am not going to sit idly by and watch this Aristocracy destroy the United States of America. And the worst part is that they (they being not only the Neo-Cons in the public eye, but also the real Aristocracy who own the Central Banks like the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers and control thing behind the scenes) are laughing their asses off because the general public is too stupid to figure what is going on right in front of their faces. Who else is a true Patriot and will stand with me and fight against the true terrorists (because by definition our own government and media are terrorists) and the resulting Tyranny, which Founding Fathers warned us about?
What I have stated above is only the tip of the iceberg, websites contain mountains of additional evidence that you might find interesting are:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project/index.htm
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.wtc7.net/
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
http://www.loosechange911.com
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.propagandamatrix.com
911 - inside job. Demand investigation!
http://www.wtc7.net - http://www.physics911.org - http://www.911-strike.com
http://www.oilempire.us - http://www.dieoff.org - http://www.peakoil.net
http://bombsinsidewtc.dk - http://www.911review.com
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/index.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca - http://www.cooperativeresearch.org
http://www.911review.com/index.html
http://www.911review.com/911review/index.html
… who believe in the official cockamamie story that 19 Islamic fundamentalists, led by Osama Bin Laden, holed up in some cave in Afghanistan, figured out how out-smart the most sophisticated intelligence organizations (NSA, CIA, FBI, etc.) on the face of the planet. Remember the official story, by definition, is nothing more than a conspiracy theory, which is severely lacking in corroborating physical evidence.
If you don’t feel like reading any more, but are interested learning what the government, 9/11 commission, and the mainstream media will not tell you, the best video I have seen to date regarding the events of 9/11 is “Loose Change, 2nd Edition” by Dylan Avery:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
First, I will start with the FACT that there are several former or current high-up governmental officials who have stated that the official simply does not add up, and at the very least, the government allowed the attacks to take place, and some are even stating that 9/11 was conducted by a faction within the government itself
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas.
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney of Georgia.
Morgan Reynolds, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush’s first term Morgan Reynolds.
Paul Craig Roberts, former Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, a former assistant secretary of the treasury in the Reagan Administration.
George Galloway, Member of U.K. Parliament.
Michael Meacher, former senior member of the Blair government.
Second the FACT the tower collapsed at free-fall speeds, which by itself, totally disproves the official explanation of how/why the twin towers collapsed, and thus casts serious, I mean serious, doubt on the official story that Al-Qaeda was solely behind the attacks. Using the equations of one-dimensional kinematics, which have been established (and accepted by all western scientists) since the time on Isaac Newton in the early 1700s, I will calculate that amount of time it would take an object to hit the ground that was dropped from the top of the two towers.
Constants:
gravity (g) = 32 ft/s^2
h1 = height of North Tower = 1368 ft
h2 = height of South Tower = 1362 ft
Equations for an object starting at rest undergoing free-fall:
Distance = (1/2) * (gravity) * (time squared)
d = (1/2) * g * (t^2)
For the North Tower:
h1 = (1/2) * g * (t1^2)
2 * h1 / g = t1^2
t1 = sqrt (2 * h1 / g)
t1 = sqrt (2 * 1368 / 32)
t1 = 9.25 seconds
For the South Tower:
h2 = (1/2) * g * (t2^2)
2 * h2 / g = t2^2
t2 = sqrt (2 * h1 / g)
t2 = sqrt (2 * 1362 / 32)
t2 = 9.23 seconds
Officially the North Tower collapsed in approximately 10 seconds, and the South Tower collapsed in 8 seconds.
The official explanation is something like:
The structural integrity of the floor(s) hit by the airplanes was significantly weakened due to the subsequent fire. Then the weight to the tower above the impact location, cause those floor(s) to collapse, which set-off a chain reaction where the upper part of the tower pancaked down onto the lower floors collapsing one-by-one. Now I am not a physicist, but I know enough physics to know that the upper part of the tower would have encountered friction/resistance to its downward motion as it crashed through each of the lower floors. Flight 11 hit the North Tower at approximately floor 90. Flight 175 hit the South Tower at approximately floor 80. Now conservatively lets say the each floor slowed the decent of the upper part of the tower by only .1 seconds, so we can estimate that the North Tower should have collapsed in 18.25 seconds (9.25 sec + 90 * 0.1 sec) and the South Tower should have collapsed in 17.23 seconds (9.23 sec + 80 * 0.1 sec). These times are significantly greater that recorded collapse times. So the only way that the tower would have collapsed at these speeds would be for the floors below the impact zone to be blown out with explosives just ahead of the fall the upper part of the tower, so that it would not encounter any resistance and thus could descend at free-fall speeds. In other words, the top of the towers would have reached the ground in the same amount of time (as the official collapse times), if the part of the tower below the airplane impact suddenly vaporized out of existence and then the upper part of the town fell to the ground.
Then on top of this, we have tapes of radio transmissions from firefighters in the towers reporting several explosions far below the where the plane impacted the towers, as well as interviews with firefighters who state there were explosion going off as the towers started to fall.
Also the Official Explanation states there were intense infernos fueled by the kerosene of the crashed airplane that covered the floors in the impact zone, and they burned from the time of impact until the towers collapsed. But then how were the people standing in the holes in the towers where the airplanes crashed (there are numerous pictures of people standing in the holes of both towers) able to survive with the intense infernos burning hot enough to significantly weaken the steel infrastructure of the towers. Here is an excellent proof using the Laws of Thermodynamics showing that there is no way there was enough jet fuel to have significantly weaken the steel structure of the tower:
http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064
Apparently, these fires also burned hot enough to have destroyed the Black Boxes (made from some of the most indestructible material on the face of the planet) from the crashed airplanes, since officially no Black Boxes were recovered. But somehow a passport (made out of flimsy substance know as paper that ignites at 451 degrees F) of one of the hijackers survives almost completely unscathed.
And then what about WTC 7, did you know that it collapsed later in the afternoon on September 11, even though it was not hit with an airplane nor falling debris from the collapses of the towers. In fact there were several buildings closer to WTC 1 and 2, one of which was actually struck by falling debris, which did not collapse. The official explanation for the collapse, was due to fire, but anyone who has seen a video of the collapse of WTC 7 would have a hard time believing that it was not brought down by explosives, as it is a picture perfect instance of controlled demolition. Physicist Steven E. Jones from BYU does an excellent job covering the physics of the collapse of WTC 7 at:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Some skeptics then might say, well if it were true that explosions brought down the towers, then the steel in the rumble should show evidence of that. But unfortunately Mayor Gulliani had all the scrap metal immediately removed from Ground Zero and shipped to China for refurbishing. Now all you watchers of the CSIs and the Law & Orders should say hey wait a second, that was the biggest crime scene in US history, nothing should be removed and least of all destroyed before it has properly been investigated. However, in spite of this attempted destruction of all the physical evidence, there were reports of molten metal below the rumble as long a month after 9/11. Now jet fuel (kerosene) at it hottest burns at 1300 degrees F, but steel does not melt until 3000 degrees F. Maybe the Islamic Terrorist filled their hijacked aircraft with “magic” jet fuel that burns hot enough to melt steel.
Isn’t it funny how the so-called skeptic who vehemently oppose all the so-called conspiracy theories, get really pissed-off at anyone who questions the official explanation, calling them un-American or un-Patriotic or using some sort of expletive to describe them (because of course as everyone knows, people who use profanity obviously know what they are talking about), but do not actually provide any physical evidence to support their own conspiracy theory. The problem with these so-called skeptics is that they are not skeptical at all when it comes to the official story, and will irrationally accept any explanation (no matter how crazy) put forth by the government and the mainstream media. But when faced with anything that goes contrary to that mainstream explanation, they switch from being irrationally accepting to being irrationally skeptical, and it seems like no matter how much physical evidence they are presented with, they are steadfast in their belief of the official conspiracy theory.
If you still believe the official Neo-Con (or we might as well call them Neo-Facist or Neo-Nazi) explanation for the events that transpired on 9/11, rather that Laws of Kinematics that have been established and accepted since Isaac Newton in the early 1700s, then you might as well stamp a bar-code on your forehead, implant a tracking microchip, and set your time machine to 1984. Or maybe Osama Bin Laden and his posse holed up in a cave in Afghanistan, figured out how to defy not only the laws of physics, but also how to defy death, since at least 7 of the supposed 19 hijackers are still alive as reported by the BBC. Maybe that is easier to accept than the terrorism that is going on right under our noses, orchestrated by the very people to claim to be our saviors.
BUT SERIOUSLY, DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, do your own research and draw your own conclusions. What a novel concept, thinking for oneself. When is the last time you heard the government or the mainstream media telling you to think for yourself. Wow, I must be a crazy Anti-American conspiracy theorist telling people to question the government and think for themselves. I sincerely love this country, our Republic (remember we are a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy), and our Constitution, and that is why I am not going to sit idly by and watch this Aristocracy destroy the United States of America. And the worst part is that they (they being not only the Neo-Cons in the public eye, but also the real Aristocracy who own the Central Banks like the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers and control thing behind the scenes) are laughing their asses off because the general public is too stupid to figure what is going on right in front of their faces. Who else is a true Patriot and will stand with me and fight against the true terrorists (because by definition our own government and media are terrorists) and the resulting Tyranny, which Founding Fathers warned us about?
What I have stated above is only the tip of the iceberg, websites contain mountains of additional evidence that you might find interesting are:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project/index.htm
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.wtc7.net/
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
http://www.loosechange911.com
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.propagandamatrix.com
911 - inside job. Demand investigation!
http://www.wtc7.net - http://www.physics911.org - http://www.911-strike.com
http://www.oilempire.us - http://www.dieoff.org - http://www.peakoil.net
http://bombsinsidewtc.dk - http://www.911review.com
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/index.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca - http://www.cooperativeresearch.org
http://www.911review.com/index.html
http://www.911review.com/911review/index.html
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$255.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network