top
Iraq
Iraq
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Sunni anger at Iraq vote change

by BBC (reposted)
Sunni Arabs have reacted angrily to a decision by Iraq's Shia-dominated parliament making it harder to reject the new constitution in 12 days' time.
The two-thirds majority needed in three provinces to defeat the constitution will now be counted from all registered - as opposed to actual - voters.

Many registered voters may not show up because of violence, it is argued.

Saleh al-Mutlaq, of the Sunni group Iraqi National Dialogue, called the change a "clear forgery".

"They want this constitution to pass despite the will of the people," he added.

BBC Baghdad correspondent Caroline Hawley says violence, intimidation and US military offensives could keep many Sunnis away from polling centres.

'Implausible' change

The interim constitution drawn up under US administrator Paul Bremer in 2003 says the following about the issue:

"The general referendum will be successful and the draft constitution ratified if a majority of the voters in Iraq approve and if two-thirds of the voters in three or more governorates do not reject it."

But on Sunday, MPs said a No vote from two-thirds of "registered" voters was needed for a veto.

The new interpretation keeps the clause stipulating that only half of actual voters are needed for the text to be adopted.

Many Sunni Arabs oppose the draft constitution on the grounds that its federal provisions could lead to the break-up of Iraq.

In elections for the transitional parliament in January, less than 60% of registered Iraqis voted after Sunni leaders called for a boycott.

'Forceful' response

With growing Sunni-Shia tension ahead of the vote, analysts say the tactical alliance between Shia religious parties and the Kurds looks in danger of unravelling.

Kurdish officials accused Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari - a Shia - of seeking to monopolise power.

They have also said he has failed to deal with the thorny issue of Kirkuk, the oil-rich northern city the Kurds see as their rightful capital.

However, President Jalal Talabani - a Kurd - played down his earlier calls for Mr Jaafari to resign.

"We don't think this is the time to change the government now," Mr Talabani said during a visit to Prague.

Mr Jaafari said that he had heard the president's comments, but did not have the time to respond to them.

"My time is taken up running the executive branch of the government. I will express myself forcefully when the time is right," he added.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4306094.stm
by IOL (reposted)
BAGHDAD, October4 , 2005 (IslamOnline.net) – Iraqi Sunni leaders and politicians hit out Tuesday, October4 , at what they called a "brazen forgery" after the Shiite-Kurdish dominated parliament amended the interim law to make it far simpler for the draft constitution to pass than for it to be defeated by Sunni opponents in the October 15 referendum.

"This is forgery of the political will of the Iraqi people in such a critical juncture in their history," Iyad Al-Samarrai, a leading member of the Sunni Islamic Party, told IslamOnline.net.

He lambasted what he called "double-standards" by the Shiites and the Kurds, who dominate almost three quarters of parliament, in explaining the articles of the interim law.

"The amendment means that the draft constitution can be passed by a simple majority of 51 percent of the voters," he said, noting that the Shiites and Kurds were playing with words when they use "voters" and "registered voters."

The change specifies that the text can only be rejected by two-thirds of "registered voters," as opposed to the prior version which said two-thirds of "voters" in any three provinces could vote down the document.

According to Article61 C of the Transitional Administrative Law, "The general referendum will be successful and the draft constitution ratified if a majority of the voters in Iraq approve and if two-thirds of the voters in three or more governorates do not reject it."

Sunni Arabs form a majority in Al-Anbar, Nineveh and Salahudin provinces.

The text adopted by parliament on Sunday, October2 , reads: "The word 'voter' in the first part of Article61 C means registered voters who have cast a ballot, and in the second part means registered voters," said the text adopted by parliament.

Big Blow

Samarrai called the amendment a big blow to democracy in Iraq.

"Such ploys and tricks will not break the staunch will of the Sunnis, who are resolved to register in numbers to vote down the charter," he said.

Adnan Al-Dulaimi, ex-chief of the Sunni Waqfs, said the amendment will only make Sunnis stronger.

"We will join forces and turn out in droves to vote down the draft constitution no matter how hard they are pressed or intimidated," he said.

Numerous Sunni Arab political and religious leaders have already called for a "no" vote to the constitution basically because they believe that its federalist provisions will divide the country.

Sunnis further charge that the latest onslaughts by US-backed Iraqi troops on Sunni towns and cities under the pretext of fighting "insurgency" are aimed at blocking Sunni registration to vote in mid October.

US Marines launched their biggest offensive so far this year against "insurgents" in western Iraq.

"Playing With Fire"

Some Kurds have also stricken the discordant note.

"It's unfair and I didn't vote for it," Mahmoud Othman, an independent Kurdish member of parliament, told Reuters. "It's a double standard and it shouldn't have happened."

Joost Hiltermann, an Iraq expert with the International Crisis Group, described the decision as a clear example of what happens when the majority decides its rules in a certain country.

"Obviously they want to win," he said of the Shiites and Kurds, who tailored parts of the constitution to suit themselves, according to pundits.

"But to play by this kind of majoritarian rule is very dangerous, it's playing with fire," he told Reuters from Amman.

"They are excluding one community to make it look as if they have agreement."

Other analysts also conceded that there was unfairness in parliament's decision, but said it just went to show how essential it was that the constitution was approved.

"If this referendum is rejected, it's an explicit rejection of the whole political process ... It cannot be allowed to fail," said Martin Navias, a research associate at the centre for defense studies at King's College London.

A leading Brussels-based think-tank also warned last week that the rushed drafting of the constitution has deepened sectarian rifts and was likely to fuel violence in the country.

The International Crisis Group (ICG) said that Iraq "appears to be heading toward de facto partition and full-scale civil war", unless Washington makes "a determined effort to broker a true compromise between Shiites, Kurds and Sunni Arabs."

Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa is expected to visit Iraq as soon as possible to prepare for a reconciliation conference grouping the country’s religious and ethnic mosaic.

http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2005-10/04/article05.shtml
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$170.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network