From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Get out the vote ¡NO! ¡NO! Keep in the vote
Get out the vote ¡NO! ¡NO! Keep in the vote
Democracy works best when most of us vote, so “Get out the vote.”
But anti-people policies work worst when most of us don’t vote, so “Keep in the vote.”
“THE LONG SHADOW OF JIM CROW” reports that the poll taxes, literacy texts and physical violence of the Jim Crow era have been replaced by more subtle and creative tactics. Among recent examples cited in the report:
•This summer, Michigan state Rep. John Pappageorge (R-Troy) was quoted in the Detroit Free Press as saying, “If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we're going to have a tough time in this election.” African Americans comprise 83% of Detroit’s population.
•In Kentucky in July 2004, Black Republican officials joined to ask their
State GOP party chairman to renounce plans to place “vote challengers” in
African-American precincts during the coming elections.
•Most recently, controversy has erupted over the use in the Orlando area of armed, plainclothes officers from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to question elderly black voters in their homes as part of a “state investigation of voting irregularities in the city's March 2003 mayoral election.” Critics have charged that the tactics used by the FDLE have intimidated black voters, which could suppress their turnout in this year’s elections. Six members of Congress recently called on Attorney General John Ashcroft to investigate potential civil rights violations in the matter.
•This year in Florida, the state ordered the implementation of a “potential
felon” purge list to remove voters from the rolls, in a disturbing echo of
the infamous 2000 purge, which removed thousands of eligible voters,
primarily African-Americans, from the rolls. The state abandoned the plan
after news media investigations revealed that the 2004 list also included
thousands of people who were eligible to vote, and heavily targeted
African-Americans while virtually ignoring Hispanic voters.
•In South Dakota’s June 2004 primary, Native American voters were prevented from voting after they were challenged to provide photo IDs, which they were not required to present under state or federal law.
•Earlier this year in Texas, a local district attorney claimed that
students at a majority black college were not eligible to vote in the county
where the school is located. It happened in Waller County – the same county where 26 years earlier, a federal court order was required to prevent
discrimination against the students.
•Last year, voters in African American areas of Philadelphia were
systematically challenged by men carrying clipboards and driving sedans with magnetic signs designed to look like law enforcement insignia.
But anti-people policies work worst when most of us don’t vote, so “Keep in the vote.”
“THE LONG SHADOW OF JIM CROW” reports that the poll taxes, literacy texts and physical violence of the Jim Crow era have been replaced by more subtle and creative tactics. Among recent examples cited in the report:
•This summer, Michigan state Rep. John Pappageorge (R-Troy) was quoted in the Detroit Free Press as saying, “If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we're going to have a tough time in this election.” African Americans comprise 83% of Detroit’s population.
•In Kentucky in July 2004, Black Republican officials joined to ask their
State GOP party chairman to renounce plans to place “vote challengers” in
African-American precincts during the coming elections.
•Most recently, controversy has erupted over the use in the Orlando area of armed, plainclothes officers from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to question elderly black voters in their homes as part of a “state investigation of voting irregularities in the city's March 2003 mayoral election.” Critics have charged that the tactics used by the FDLE have intimidated black voters, which could suppress their turnout in this year’s elections. Six members of Congress recently called on Attorney General John Ashcroft to investigate potential civil rights violations in the matter.
•This year in Florida, the state ordered the implementation of a “potential
felon” purge list to remove voters from the rolls, in a disturbing echo of
the infamous 2000 purge, which removed thousands of eligible voters,
primarily African-Americans, from the rolls. The state abandoned the plan
after news media investigations revealed that the 2004 list also included
thousands of people who were eligible to vote, and heavily targeted
African-Americans while virtually ignoring Hispanic voters.
•In South Dakota’s June 2004 primary, Native American voters were prevented from voting after they were challenged to provide photo IDs, which they were not required to present under state or federal law.
•Earlier this year in Texas, a local district attorney claimed that
students at a majority black college were not eligible to vote in the county
where the school is located. It happened in Waller County – the same county where 26 years earlier, a federal court order was required to prevent
discrimination against the students.
•Last year, voters in African American areas of Philadelphia were
systematically challenged by men carrying clipboards and driving sedans with magnetic signs designed to look like law enforcement insignia.
For more information:
http://www.sunmt.org/intro.html
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
fuck the vote
Thu, Oct 28, 2004 9:16PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network