top
Environment
Environment
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Appeals Court Delays Pepper Spray Trial

by No Pepper Spray (nopepperspray-subscribe [at] yahoogroups.com)
The federal Court of Appeals issued a stay order May 8 delaying the Headwaters vs.Humboldt pepper spray trial until our emergency appeal is decided.
Appeals court stay order delays Q-tip pepper spray Eureka trial from starting May 12!

Late Thursday, May 8, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay order delaying our second trial until the appeals court decides our emergency appeal. The case was assigned to the same three-judge appellate panel which handled our previous appeal and strongly reversed Judge Walker's decisions dismissing our case and granting immunity to the sheriff and his chief deputy.

The appeals court stay order instructs the defendants in our suit (Humboldt County, City of Eureka, Sheriff Gary Philp and ex-Sheriff Dennis Lewis) to file a response to our petition for writ of mandamus by May 20. We plaintiffs then have until June 2 to file a reply to their response. We think the appellate panel will make a decision sometime in June.

Attorney Ben Rosenfeld, who prepared the emergency appeal, had this reaction: "We are grateful the court has taken our appeal seriously because it IS serious. We were ready to go to trial on May 12 as scheduled, but we want it to be a fair trial with an unbiased judge and jury, and this is the way that can happen. Of course, there has been no decision yet on our petition to hold the trial in San Francisco and assign a different judge. But the 9th Circuit takes our arguments seriously enough to delay the trial until it has time to consider them carefully. We are hopeful that they will ultimately make the right decision."

Plaintiff Spring Lundberg commented on KMUD radio (Garberville/Redway CA) news this evening: "I love Humboldt County, I love the forests here, and I love the people. I think it's unfortunate that a multinational corporation is ripping us apart. I believe in bridging the gap between workers and forest defenders, and I hope that can happen and heal our community. I do love Humboldt County, but I believe that our pepper spray trial needs an international forum, and that will happen if we get a trial in San Francisco. And I would just add that this case should no more be tried in Eureka than a civil rights trial in 1965 should be moved to Selma, Alabama."

This case arose from the Humboldt County Sheriff's 1997 use of pepper spray applied to the eyes with Q-tips or sprayed from inches away to try to coerce nonviolent Headwaters Forest protesters into unlocking their arms from a human chain. Nine activists filed a federal civil rights suit, and after a hung jury in a 1998 San Francisco trial the judge dismissed the case rather than hold a new trial. The appeals court reversed the judge's dismissal, granting a new trial, and the U.S. Supreme Court agreed. When the case was returned to the original trial judge, U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, he decided to hold the new trial in Humboldt County's seat, Eureka, long a hotbed of controversy over logging protests against Pacific Lumber Company.

The political turmoil in Humboldt is particularly hot right now because Humboldt County's new District Attorney recently filed a $250-million fraud suit against Pacific Lumber, and the company has responded by instigating a recall campaign against the DA. The company has also been running a controversial ad campaign on TV, radio and in full-page newspaper ads portraying local environmental activists as "eco-terrorists" threatening timber workers and their families. Earth First! forest activists in the region have for over a decade rejected the use of tree-spiking and equipment sabotage, instead using civil disobedience tactics like tree-sitting and blockading logging roads, often using human chains in which activists lock their arms together inside metal tubes designed to make it more difficult to remove them.

Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
From Maryland
Sun, Nov 9, 2003 10:57AM
p.l. lost
Wed, May 21, 2003 3:11PM
q-tip
Sat, May 17, 2003 1:13PM
do you want it all
Fri, May 16, 2003 3:55PM
Wildcard
Thu, May 15, 2003 5:40PM
Indigo Bunting
Wed, May 14, 2003 11:08PM
Same old B.S.
Wed, May 14, 2003 10:23PM
Marian the Librarian
Wed, May 14, 2003 8:10PM
Indigo Bunting
Tue, May 13, 2003 10:17PM
Same old B.S.
Tue, May 13, 2003 8:15PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$65.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network