Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Cielo di San Francisco and Who Is Affected By These Actions
One of the organizers of the Portland picket of the Cielo di San Francisco explains who was affected by that action. And why they did it.
The Cielo di San Francisco is German-owned and its crew is German. Because they have a strong merchant seaman’s Union and much better (compared to the US) labor laws in Germany, the crew has good working conditions, wages, and time off. None of this is relevant to Wednesday’s action.
Who cares if UPS leases or owns its delivery trucks? I once worked loading them, and I don’t even know which is the case. Ownership of the vehicles was not an issue in the UPS strike, and it wasn’t at Terminal 6 either.
The ship is leased and operated by the Italia Lines, a subsidiary of d’Amico Compagnia di Navigazione (chairman and principal investor Antonio d’Amico). Painted on the side of the ship, in letters 20 feet high is “Italia Lines.” The line leases the boat to ship goods from port to port. That is how they make money. Any increase in the operating costs in a voyage will be bourne by the Italia Lines, not the ship owner, not the crew.
A delay in port increases costs to the line, and may also cause any future owners of cargo to be shipped to the Northwest to question the reliability of the Italia Lines.
I would be amazed if the terms of the lease of the Cielo di San Francisco allowed the Italia Lines to pass on costs of delay to the ship owner. That would be unheard-of. The owner of the Cielo di San Francisco was not hurt by this action.
The crew gets paid anyway, and they got an extra day in port, which is something that a seaman welcomes, especially in Portland. Essentially the crew got a paid holiday out of it.
The ILWU longshoremen did not lose work. They unloaded the boat anyway, Wednesday night and Thursday day instead of Wednesday day and night. This change might have inconvenienced some longshoreman or caused a few to miss a shift because of a previous engagement on their calendar for Thursday, for that I’m sorry. If we had done a better job of turnout, the Port Arbitrator would have awarded the Longshoremen who honored our picket line a day's pay because we constituted a safety risk. I wish we could have done that.
Who does that leave? The Italia Lines and Antonio d’Amico lost money because of their support for Silvio Berlusconi and his Fuerza Italia ruling coalition. Too fucking bad.
As Walden Bello, executive director of Focus on the Global South in Bangkok, said at an event in Melbourne last September during the meetings of the World Economic Forum there,
“[Italian marxian thinker and victim of Mussolini, Antonio] Gramsci once described the bureaucracy as but an ‘outer trench behind which lay a powerful system of fortresses and earthworks.’ We must no longer think simply in terms of neutralizing the multilateral agencies that form the outer trenches of the system but of disabling the transnational corporations that are fortresses and the earthworks that constitute the core of the global economic system. I am talking about disabling not just the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank but the transnational corporation itself. And I am not talking about a process of ‘reregulating’ the TNCs but of eventually disabling or dismantling them as fundamental hazards to people, society, the environment, to everything we hold dear.”
Who cares if UPS leases or owns its delivery trucks? I once worked loading them, and I don’t even know which is the case. Ownership of the vehicles was not an issue in the UPS strike, and it wasn’t at Terminal 6 either.
The ship is leased and operated by the Italia Lines, a subsidiary of d’Amico Compagnia di Navigazione (chairman and principal investor Antonio d’Amico). Painted on the side of the ship, in letters 20 feet high is “Italia Lines.” The line leases the boat to ship goods from port to port. That is how they make money. Any increase in the operating costs in a voyage will be bourne by the Italia Lines, not the ship owner, not the crew.
A delay in port increases costs to the line, and may also cause any future owners of cargo to be shipped to the Northwest to question the reliability of the Italia Lines.
I would be amazed if the terms of the lease of the Cielo di San Francisco allowed the Italia Lines to pass on costs of delay to the ship owner. That would be unheard-of. The owner of the Cielo di San Francisco was not hurt by this action.
The crew gets paid anyway, and they got an extra day in port, which is something that a seaman welcomes, especially in Portland. Essentially the crew got a paid holiday out of it.
The ILWU longshoremen did not lose work. They unloaded the boat anyway, Wednesday night and Thursday day instead of Wednesday day and night. This change might have inconvenienced some longshoreman or caused a few to miss a shift because of a previous engagement on their calendar for Thursday, for that I’m sorry. If we had done a better job of turnout, the Port Arbitrator would have awarded the Longshoremen who honored our picket line a day's pay because we constituted a safety risk. I wish we could have done that.
Who does that leave? The Italia Lines and Antonio d’Amico lost money because of their support for Silvio Berlusconi and his Fuerza Italia ruling coalition. Too fucking bad.
As Walden Bello, executive director of Focus on the Global South in Bangkok, said at an event in Melbourne last September during the meetings of the World Economic Forum there,
“[Italian marxian thinker and victim of Mussolini, Antonio] Gramsci once described the bureaucracy as but an ‘outer trench behind which lay a powerful system of fortresses and earthworks.’ We must no longer think simply in terms of neutralizing the multilateral agencies that form the outer trenches of the system but of disabling the transnational corporations that are fortresses and the earthworks that constitute the core of the global economic system. I am talking about disabling not just the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank but the transnational corporation itself. And I am not talking about a process of ‘reregulating’ the TNCs but of eventually disabling or dismantling them as fundamental hazards to people, society, the environment, to everything we hold dear.”
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
The only blemish on the article is the extremist quote at the end, that all trans-national corporations are evil demonic unholy things right down to their DNA. Any organization.. a trans-national corp, a union, a boy scout troop, the Black Bloc.. is only as good or as bad as its people.
*Sj
prone to defects of character.
often they go transnational to excape things like taxation(their fare share) to export and play games with profit, because a corrupt gov't actually subsidizes their creation of extranational branches.
You're right; they aren't all bad. There are good correctional officers too. With high aspirations of serving humanity.
It's a problem that is too easy to fall for, when a BabyHuuey corp moves into a country perhaps only a fraction of its own net worth. It gets an Idea it can run things. It usually also gets proof of the idea- from the countries leaders- From bankers (they are a 'special' class of transnational corps. From backers of stable dictatorships.
It's as if transnationals are the driving force behind the money that flows in this morass. Simple solution- put a stake in the heart of the vampire. Then all the enthralled people who serve it won't have a logic, won't have a master to serve in the dark.Kill the Vampire!!!
I see the Gramsci quote as the cherry on the ice cream.