Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: U.S. | Womyn
Don't Call Latest Abortion Bans 'Heartbeat Bills,' Doctors Say
by Julia Conley
Thursday Jun 6th, 2019 12:26 AM
Doctors warn of medically inaccurate right-wing talking points.
Via Common Dreams under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Photo of No Bans Demonstration in Palo Alto by Stephanie Stilwell, Stilwell Photography.
As reproductive rights advocates fight a recent upswell in extremist state abortion bans, the nation's largest association for doctors specializing in women's health on Wednesday warned against using the misleading language deployed by the anti-choice movement.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) told reporters that so-called "heartbeat bills" which have passed in Georgia, Alabama, and Ohio in recent weeks should be referred to as "six-week abortion bans."

Using the term "heartbeat bill," as the mostly-Republican lawmakers who have pushed the regulations have, suggests that doctors can actually detect a fetal heartbeat at six weeks of pregnancy.

In fact, ACOG President Dr. Ted Anderson told The Guardian, "what is interpreted as a heartbeat in these bills is actually electrically induced flickering of a portion of the fetal tissue that will become the heart as the embryo develops."

The six-week cut-off which has been pushed in several states is "arbitrary," added Anderson, and "[does] not reflect medical accuracy or clinical understanding."

Other critics have made similar arguments, saying the anti-choice movement is interested not in protecting fetuses and six-week-old embryos but in controlling women's reproductive choices and attacking Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision which affirmed that American women have the right to abortion care.

ACOG's recommendation came a day after the United Nations deputy commissioner on human rights, Kate Gilmore, denounced recent anti-choice laws in the U.S. as products of "extremist hate" aimed at women and called on rights advocates "to stand with the evidence and facts and in solidarity with women."

As women's rights advocate and author Rebecca Solnit wrote in The Guardian this week, the anti-choice movement has recently gained ground in its effort to curtail women's reproductive rights through the use of blatant lies about abortion care, specifically their claim that women and doctors commit infanticide during rare abortions which take place in the last trimester of pregnancy—often when the pregnant patient's life or health is at risk or when fetal abnormalities have been detected.

With its warning on Wednesday, ACOG suggested that misleading language about abortions early in pregnancy are part of that strategy as well.

"Anti-abortion laws are built on anti-abortion lies," wrote Solnit. "Lies about things like who has abortions, how abortions work, how women's bodies work, and how fetuses develop. The lies pave the way for the laws."

"To defeat the laws," Solnit added, "we must fight the lies."
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!


donate now

$ 143.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.


Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network