From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: San Francisco | Labor & Workers
OHSHA Investigator Calls On US DOL Secretary Acosta To Investigate Former DOL Sec.Perez
by Darrell Whitman
Monday Jun 5th, 2017 9:29 AM
Former US OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program investigator and lawyer Darrell Whitman is calling on US Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta to investigate the obstruction of justice and cover-up by former Department of Labor Secretary Tom Perez. Perez was personally involved in trying to stop and independent investigation of the culture of corruption at the WPP and the workplace bullying and retaliation against workers at the WPP who were investigating cases of workers who had been fired for reporting on health and safety problems.
OHSHA Whistleblower Protection Program Investigator Calls On US DOL Secretary Alexander Acosta To Investigate Obstruction of Justice By Former DOL Secretary Tom Perez & Others

Dr. Darrell Whitman, (former) Regional Investigator OSHA Region IX

c/o Government Accountability Project

Email: publicsafety4america(at)

May 30, 2017

R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary United States Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Secretary Acosta,

As I write on this Memorial Day 2017, it’s been three years since I wrote a letter to your predecessor, Thomas Perez, reporting what I believed was evidence of a culture of corruption in OSHA Region IX. Over the last three years, it has become evident that the corruption extends far beyond OSHA Region IX more generally to OSHA, the Department of Labor, other federal regulatory programs, and the Office of Special Counsel. That letter first led to a purge of all the attorney/investigators in Region IX’s whistleblower protection program, then to a cover- up/obstruction of justice designed to conceal the systemic nature of the corruption, which now has been continued by the OSC as it refuses to act and order an investigation notwithstanding overwhelming evidence and a growing public awareness of the corruption.

The corruption I reported, and my fellow attorney/investigators recognized in OSHA’s Whistleblower Protection Program, reflects a collapse of the effort to protect nation’s safety, health, and financial security by failing to protect whistleblowers. Among the 100 cases I investigated before I was terminated in May 2015 after publicly disclosing the corruption, were cases involving the mismanagement of a nuclear power plant, the widespread and knowing falsification of asbestos tests, ongoing violations of FAA regulations regarding air safety and aircraft maintenance, serious incidences of workplace bullying, the unsafe transport of explosives over the nation’s highways, and systemic fraud in banking and financial services. These cases were all dismissed by OSHA management in the face of powerful evidence, not only qualifying the whistleblower for protection but also demonstrating the need to initiate regulatory action to protect the public.

There have been real and measurable consequences for OSHA’s failures, reflected most recently with the more than 3 million fraudulent consumer accounts generated by Wells Fargo. In California and elsewhere, Wells Fargo targeted Hispanics with limited language skills and knowledge of banking precisely because they were not likely to recognize and report the fraud. Many Wells Fargo employees came forward to report the fraud, some as early as 2002, and in 2010 my OSHA supervisor order me to close two Wells Fargo cases reporting fraud without an

investigation. More evidence can be found in the recent spike in fatal trucking accidents, caused primarily by poor maintenance and pressure on drivers to ignore safe driving practices. And yet more evidence can be found in the blast at West, Texas, that killed 13 volunteer firemen, the flaming crash of a FedEx truck in Northern California that killed 11 high school students, and the 2000 crash of an Alaska Airlines flight near LAX that killed 80 people. All of these were preventable incidents, and to prevent them we need to hold senior OSHA and DOL bureaucrats accountable for respecting the law and public policy.

Over the last fifteen years, OSHA has found merit ordered corrective action, and reported potential violations to appropriate regulatory agencies in less than two percent of whistleblower cases. In spite of repeated GAO audits, a chorus of complaints from outside observers, and increased funding for OSHA, the results have not materially changed. A similar story could be told about the Office of Special Counsel and the Merit System Protection Board, the two agencies tasked with protecting federal whistleblowers, such as myself. We can respectfully debate public policy and the role of federal regulation, but we can’t ignore law or the policy goals set by Congress when it adopted these laws. Until and unless we reaffirm those principles in the management of government, we can’t expect public support or respect for what we do.

On behalf of myself and a growing number of whistleblowers who have joined together in Whistleblowers United, and on behalf of their families, and the individuals, families and communities adversely affected by OSHA failures, I would respectfully request your support for the current effort to thoroughly investigate and correct these problems. The Government Accountability Project (GAP) is poised to ask members of the Senate and House Whistleblower Caucuses for an investigation, and to intervene with the Office of Special Counsel to end its delays. The breadth and depth of the corruption, and the likelihood laws have been broken, argues an investigation needs to be done by a group authorized to conduct such an investigation. Media coverage of the corruption is expanding and will expand further if the Grand Jury begins to issue indictments, and as GAP’s lobbying effort becomes public. The time to act is now, and we hope we can act together in this critical matter.

Respectfully yours,

Darrell Whitman
(former) Regional Investigator OSHA Region IX


Hon. Donald Trump, President of the United States The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20500

c/o Government Accountability Project

Email: publicsafety4america(at)

Additional Links:

Former DOL Secretary Tom Perez OSHA/DOL: Corruption And Analysis Of White House Involvement

by Dr. Darrell Whitman, Whistleblower At DOL/OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program


There are two coincidental analyses, which imply White House involvement in both the 2014 OSHA-led retaliatory investigation/obstruction of justice that led to my removal and the purge of all attorney/investigators in OSHA Region IX, and the continuing foot-dragging by the OSC in its investigation of my complaint. The first analysis below offers a context strongly pointing to the White House as acting to preserve the WBPP as a dysfunction program. Connecting the dots which follows shows how named individuals played roles in planning and executing the 2014 OSHA investigation. When read together, the two offer a strong case the Obama Administration acted with an intent to prevent any credible audit, and block any investigation into the WBPP that might threaten its relationships with major corporate donors many, if not most, of which had business before the DOL, OSHA and the WBPP.

The overall analysis refers back to the companion Timeline of Events. While the Timeline is much broader, the meaning of individual events becomes more apparent through connecting the dots between the events and the people involved. When I authored my May 2014 “culture of corruption” letter to Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez, I assumed that it would prompt a review of the issues I raised. It was only as the implications, which followed from the faux investigation it prompted that I began to see the deeper corruption that now appears from the evidence. In the broadest sense, it reveals how control of perceptions by a politically sophisticated governing coalition concealed the deeper project of providing privileged services to important corporate supporters, which ultimate led not only to wide-spread corruption within the federal government, but generated risks and damage to the nation’s safety, health, an financial security.

Context: The White House and OSHA/DOL management

Beginning with the nomination of David Michaels as Director of OSHA, and Hilda Solis as Secretary of Labor, the agenda of the Obama White House showed a strong tilt favoring the appointment of “loyalist” who responded more to political pressure than an interest in good government. Prior to his appointment as Director of OSHA, David Michaels was a Democratic Party loyalist who served as the Assistant Secretary in the Clinton Administration’s Department of Energy. In that role, Michael’s steered the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act toward an outcome that low-balled employee injury claims, created a web of regulations that made it sometimes impossible to file claims, and ultimately shifted the costs associated with nuclear work from the nuclear industry to government to the tune of some $14 billion dollars between 2000 and 2014.

Michaels’ “achievement” with the EEOICPA served business by lowering costs, which the Clinton Administration favored, even as it shifted those costs to the federal government and injured nuclear workers. In retrospect, we now know Michaels fit neatly into the Clinton Administration’s pro-business, collaborative, anti-regulatory bias. Thus, it should not have been a surprise that Michaels would similarly subordinate his OSHA role to serving similar interests pursued by the Obama Administration. However, Michaels political service to the Obama Administration as the Director of OSHA was reinforced and supplemented by pre-existing corrupt relationships between OSHA and the powerful corporate interests it was tasked to regulate that extended back to the early 1990s, if not before. As repeated audits and outside studies of OSHA and its management of the Whistleblower Protection Program (WBPP) have shown, despite serious Congressional efforts to protect whistleblowers, and multiple GAO audits, the WBPP made little progress in meeting that Congressional intent.

Hilda Solis was appointed as Secretary of Labor by the Obama Administration, not for her administrative skills (she had no background as a manager), but for her political connections to organized labor. As noted in the Timeline, Solis was eventually forced to resign when it was discovered she was abusing her office to conduct fund-raising for the 2012 Obama Presidential campaign, and receiving unreported “free rides” on union- owned aircraft. Less well known, however, was that during her tenure as Secretary, the DOL dropped to near the bottom in federal reviews of labor-management relations. This included widespread abuse of authority by DOL managers, including attacks on disabled workers and gender and racial discrimination. When Solis was replaced by Thomas Perez in 2013, the management abuses continued, rather than stopped, as the Secretary’s office had aggressively active to suppress employee complaints about corruption in the DOL. For his part, Perez’s appointment was approved only by a straight party-line vote after serious questions were raised about his role in leading the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and his arrogant disregard to the law and for Congress.

Evidence of White House’s interest in maintaining the corruption in the WBPP came early in 2010. With Micheal’s confirmation delayed until early December 2009, the White House would have been directly involved in planning an OSHA response to the GAO audit that was scheduled for release later in 2010. Criticisms of OSHA’s management of the WBPP were widespread at that time, as reported by the Washington Post and other media. Ordinarily, it would be expected that a new OSHA Director would want to wait for the GAO audit, and then respond by initiating changes prompted by the GAO’s findings. But, in this case, soon after his appointment Michaels organized a “top to bottom” Management Review shortly after he took office, which only could have happened with the knowledge, and likely approval if not direction, of the White House. Rather than responding to the ongoing critique of the WBPP, the Review at best obfuscated the criticism, and at worst acted to cover up the ongoing corruption in the WBPP.

Subsequent choices by Michaels and the OSHA Directorate, all of whom were either direct political appointments or Senior Executive Service appointments who were also political appointments, similarly reflect a political agenda to block any substantive reform of the WBPP. Seven months after releasing their “Management Review” in December 2010, the OSHA Directorate forced out then WBPP Director Nilgun Tolek in July 2011. Tolek’s departure came after her persistent efforts to bring the WBPP into conformity with legislative intent. Tolek’s departure also left the WBPP without effective leadership for more than a year, which seemed not to concern the OSHA Directorate. When Beth Slavet was finally appointed as WBPP Director in late November 2012, she, like Tolek, began to closely examine why the WBPP was continuing to fail its critical role in protecting whistleblowers. Slavet, who was a highly- regarded expert with deep experience in whistleblower law as the leader of the Merit System Protection Board in the 1990s, began a push to find answers to the WBPP’s dysfunction soon after her appointment. However, also like Tolek when she began to push beyond their acceptable limits, the Directorate also drove Slavet from the WBPP in early 2014, a mere 15 months into her term. Because of their sensitivity, neither of these personnel actions could have been taken without the knowledge and approval of the White House, which according to media reports took a very “hands on” approach to federal management.

The ongoing drama of mismanagement and abuse of authority in DOL and OSHA also could not have gone unnoticed by the White House. However, rather than proactively address these issues, the White House chose instead to conceal them, and then obfuscate them when they emerged into full view in the media. For example, the actions taken against Tolek and Slavet were tolerated, rather than opposed, and the ongoing corruption within the DOL and OSHA prompted only a media offense rather than corrective action, against managers who were well-known scoff-laws. Further, as reported in a 2016 article in Politico, the ethos of the Obama administration was “discipline, loyalty, dogged efficiency and obsession over process”, as personified by Obama’s Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough. Politico further described McDonough himself as seeing “his primary role as carrying out, not challenging, the boss’s decisions—and a first-class control freak.” Couple with the Obama Administrations open contempt for federal whistleblower, it gives deeper meaning to McDonough’s recent claim he is most proud the Obama Administration avoided any scandals during his term as Chief of Staff.

Connecting the Dots

The important dots connecting the 2014 retaliatory investigation/obstruction of justice to the White house are as follows:

Beth Slavet. Less than a month after she became Director of the WBPP, I forwarded an email to Slavet reflecting my on-going debate with Blake Wu, then acting RSI in Region IX. The debate was a high-level legal discussion about the Agency’s practice of concealing evidence developed during an investigation from the parties. It generally followed the discussion of law and WBPP policy in the Whistleblower Investigations Manual, which clearly directed evidence, should be shared with the parties in the interest of achieving an early resolution. When the debate bogged down, I forwarded the email chain that reflected the debate to Region IX Regional Administrator Ken Atha and Ms. Slavet. When Slavet asked Atha about my email, he responded by telling her and Richard Fairfax, a member of the OSHA Directorate, the agency was “organizing discipline for me”.

Although I don’t have the conversations that followed from my disclosure, I would guess Slavet’s experience and knowledge must have informed her of that Atha’s comment was a potential violation of the federal Whistleblower Protection Act. This assumption is reinforced by a second email between Atha and Slavet about two months later, where Atha asks Slavet for clarification about WBPP disclosure policies. Whether or not my question triggered or enhanced Slavet’s concerns about OSHA management of the WBPP, Slavet is shown the door a year later when she began an effort to organize a credible audit of the WBPP.

Tom Devine and Emily Spieler: On April 29, 2014, shortly after Slavet was forced out, Tom Devine and Ms. Spieler testified to Congress that the WBPP was continuing in a pattern of failure to protect whistleblowers, in spite of repeated audits. Tom Devine also expressed his concern that Slavet’s removal was prompted by her efforts to audit the WBPP, which would have constituted a violation of the WPA. Devine, as the Legal Director of the Government Accountability Project, and Spieler, Dean of the Northeastern University School of law and Chair of OSHA’s Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee, were prominent external critics of the WBPP, and it is highly likely that what they said prompted alarms at OSHA, with Secretary Perez, and at the White House, particularly in the context of the 2014 Congressional elections.

Less than three weeks later, I sent my “culture of corruption” letter to Perez, and copied it to the White House. It substantially echoed the testimony of Devine and Spieler, except it put a finer point on how the WBPP was submerged in a “culture of corruption”. At the time, I wasn’t aware of the Congressional hearings and Devine and Spieler’s testimony. But as event unfolded, it was clear my letter had been received with alarm. My expectations were low, but protocols directed that Perez would at least acknowledge my letter, and then direct me to file disclosures with the OSC. I would later learn that the Whistleblower Enhancement Act, which had come into law five months earlier, required the DOL and OSHA to both provide information employees about such disclosure, and the appointment of an Ombudsman who could assist in improving disclosures. To the best of my knowledge, and reflecting on my experience with Perez, neither the DOL, nor OSHA made any attempt to honor the WEA.

Although neither Perez, nor anyone else, acknowledged my letter, Perez did acknowledge knowing of it when AP reporter Justin Pritchard asked him about it in early July. I had copied the letter to Pritchard as part of an ongoing discussion we were having about the failure of the WBPP to protect whistleblowers at the FedEx facility in Los Angeles. When he asked Perez about the letter, Perez not only acknowledged knowing about it, but also offered that DOL was “responding” to it. Then, two weeks later, Pritchard’s editors stopped his AP OSHA investigation.

Kirk Sanders: Kirk Sanders was the White House staff member who vetted the Perez nomination as DOL Secretary. However, according to his bio, Sanders also was a political operative for the Democratic Party who specialized in “communications”. As the person vetting Perez, Sanders would have developed a deep knowledge about Perez’s background and gained a personal relationship with Perez. This would have put him in the position of a conduit for conversations between Perez and the White House, and qualified him to assume a role in conducting damage control with regard to the Slavet situation and my letter to Perez.

In 2014, at the time of the Slavet crisis and my letter, Sanders worked under Denis McDonough, the White House Chief of Staff who was known for his micromanagement of White House affairs and close collaboration with President Obama. Although, I don’t as yet have confirming evidence, it’s likely Slavet’s removal and my letter became a topic of conversation between Perez and the White House. My suspicions are supported by Sanders sudden appointment as OSHA Chief of Staff at the end of July 2014. The position had been vacant for a long time, but it offered an opportunity to manage “crises” involving OSHA. Plus, Sanders assignment to the position could not be characterized as a promotion, and Sanders had no prior experience with acting as a Chief of Staff. Rather, the timing and context argue he was sent by the White House to OSHA as part of a plan for damage control.

Dorothy Dougherty: Dougherty was a career Senior Executive Service OSHA bureaucrat whose daughter is a high-level manager in OSHA Region V. She had no experience in high-level policy management before her appointment, and little or no experience with WBPP policy and practice. Also, because of the reorganization of the OSHA Directorate in 2012, Dougherty’s appointment gave her authority only over OSHA Regional management, not over the WBPP. Yet, it was Dougherty, rather than Directorate member Jordan Barab, who was tasked with supervising the retaliatory investigation in 2014. Barab was the designated supervisor of the WBPP, and its odd that Barab never appears to have touched an investigation, which at its heart involved the WBPP. Curiously, when tasked with the conduct of the 2014 investigation, Dougherty appointed Rita Lucero, an ARA in OSHA Region VII who led the 2010 OSHA “Management Review”, and Sabina Khadka, a liaison with DOL OIG, as the principal investigators.

Rita Lucero: Lucero was not only an insider in the ongoing cover-up of corruption in the WBPP that begin in 2010, if not earlier, she also was a close associate and friend of two of the targets of my “culture of corruption” letter to Perez – Joshua Paul and James Wulff, both of whom had also worked on the 2010 OSHA “Management Review”. As such, she had a strong conflict of interest, and her appointment to this role points to how it was from the beginning envision as another cover up.
Sabina Khadka: I had a hard time finding Sabina Khadka on the OSHA staff directory. When I did find her, it was by looking at the DOL OIG website, where she appear as the OSHA-OIG liaison. As such, her appointment appears to reflect an effort to preclude any potential subsequent investigation by the DOL OIG of the issues I raised. This was confirmed in November 2014, when the DOL OIG refused to conduct an investigation, based on its reading of the 2014 OSHA report of investigation – a report I was subsequently denied, based on OSHA claim it was a protected internal document.

The important dots connecting the OSC and its treatment of my complaint to the White house are as follows:

Carolyn Lerner: Ms. Lerner’s 2011 appointment by Obama to be OSC Director was designed primarily to cement political relationships with Obama political constituency, but without enhancing whistleblower protection. One of Lerner primary qualifications of interest to the Obama Administration was her experience with and commitment to mediation, which as a form of dispute resolution obviates investigations and thus protects wrongdoing from accountability. Lerner quickly acted to appoint the Executive Director of the Government Accountability Project as her second in command, thus shoring up support for her mediation initiative.

In February 2016, a year after I filed my disclosures and eight months after I noticed the OSC GAP would be filing an OSC complaint, Lerner asks John Podesta, a personal friend, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager and friend and political ally of Thomas Perez, for help in gaining her reappointment as OSC Director. The request is legally problematic, but two months later a Senate committee hastily approves here reappointment, coincidentally with Senators questioning OSC practices and whether they are actually hurting rather than helping federal whistleblowers.

In April 2016, GAP filed a PPP complaint with the OSC, supported by a 215-page affidavit and more than 340 exhibits. The OSC delayed almost 4 weeks in assigning an investigator, never acknowledging that the same investigator had been assigned to my complaint in 2015, yet conducted no investigation. The OSC subsequently denied me interim relief in the form of a stay of my removal, notwithstanding strong evidence supporting that relief. Investigation dragged on through September 2016, at which time the review was complete. However the OSC refused to issue a “Substantial Likelihood” letter and order an investigation, in spite of additional support for the complaint in the form of multiple affidavits from complainants and OSHA whistleblower investigators with specific knowledge about the complaint.

Thomas Perez: As DOL Secretary, Perez had concomitant duties related to OSHA management. This included appointments to the OSHA Whistleblower Advisory Group. In 2015, following the 2014 retaliatory OSHA investigation in which Perez was involved, and following my disclosures to the OSC and my removal, Perez chose to nominate Eric K. Bachman, Deputy Special Counsel for Litigation and Legal Affairs, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, as the Federal Representative to the Whistleblower Advisory Group. The appointment, which was for two years, created an ongoing relationship between Perez and Bachman, and by extension the OSC, which was maintained as Bachman continued to be involved in managing OSC complaints. Whether or not in fact, the relationship between Perez and Bachman represented an inherent conflict of interest where Bachman benefitted from his association with Perez, who was the subject of an OSC investigation.

Further, Perez had and has a very close connection to the White House and the power brokers in the Democratic Party. It begins with his promotion by the Obama Administration to ever-higher posts, notwithstanding his known lack of integrity and willingness to attack whistleblowers. It continues with his close personal as well as political relationships to the Clintons and John Podesta, who played a key role in supporting Carolyn Lerner’s interest in a reappointment as OSC Director. And not it ends with Perez appointment as DNC Chair, where his primary role is to promote fundraising from among major corporate contributors, most, if not all of whom, had business related to the DOL, OSHA the WBPP.

Dr. Darrell Whitman

Additional media:

On 2017 Workers Memorial Day , OSHA, Culture Of Corruption, The Deep State & Tom Perez with OSHA Investigator Darrell Whitman
Darrell Whitman was an investigator and lawyer with the Department of Labor OSHA and the Whistleblower Protection Program. His job was to investigate the validity of complaints by workers who charged they had been retaliated against for making health and safety complaints. He would then issue a merit determination that would return the works to their jobs. Some of these workers were from the largest corporations in the world including Wells Fargo, FedEx, Lockheed Martin, PG&E, Test America and J.P. Morgan.
He was bullied and retaliated for doing his job and finally terminated after he accused former DOL secretary Tom Perez that there was a "culture of corruption" in the Department of Labor DOL. He believes that DOL Secretary Tom Perez, the Office of Special Counsel OSC and other officials in the government are in criminal collusion with the same companies that they are supposed to regulate and is calling for a special prosecutor and RICO investigation and prosecution against these officials. The regulatory capture by corporations of government agencies according to Darrell Whitman is endemic. He also talks about May Day 2017 and what workers need to do to protect their health and safety.
This interview was done for KPFA WorkWeek Radio on April 23, 2017.
For more media:
Production of KPFA WorkWeek Radio
workweek [at]

GAP Press Release-US House Committee Asked To Investigate Corruption In Department of Labor
PRESS RELEASE on the corruption in the US Department of Labor
January 25, 2017by globalfaultlines


House Oversight Committee Asked to Investigate Corruption in Department of Labor
Washington, D.C. – January 24, 2017 – Tom Devine, Legal Director of the Government
Accountability Project, has asked the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to investigate corruption in the Department of Labor.
In a letter, dated Monday, January 23, 2017, Devine directed the Committee’s attention “to a series of disclosures filed by Dr. Darrell Whitman regarding systematic mismanagement, violations of law and abuse of authority within OSHA’s Whistleblower Protection Program
(WBPP).” Whitman made these disclosures to the Office of Special Counsel, beginning in
November 2014 and filed a complaint with the OSC in May 2014.
Whitman was terminated in May 2015 after reporting “a culture of corruption to then Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez, and in while publicly speaking out about corruption in the Program.
Following Whitman’s termination, OSHA purged Region IX of three other attorney/ investigators who had been complained for years about OSHA mismanagement and abuse.
Devine spoke with the Committee’s minority staff members in November 2016 to discuss the situation, and during the meeting the staff requested the documents. The documents submitted by GAP included Whitman’s 16-page OSC complaint, his 220-page sworn affidavit supported by 400 exhibits, and more than a dozen affidavits and statements from other WBPP investigators, union officials, and whistleblowers who were denied protection by OSHA.
The letter noted Whitman’s disclosures included; the mismanagement of complaints concerning the falsification of asbestos tests, violations of FAA regulations governing aircraft maintenance and flight operations, violations of NRC regulations intended to protect the safe operation of nuclear power plants, violations of DOT regulations concerning the transport of hazardous materials and drivers operating trucks on the nation’s highways, and the fraudulent management of customer accounts by Wells Fargo and JP Morgan Chase.
Whitman urged GAP to make the submissions after learning Secretary Perez’s had abandoned his promised review of OSHA’s role in the Wells Fargo fraud cases. Whitman, who had been ordered to close two of these cases in 2010 without an investigation, and who handled a third case in 2012 which languished for four years without action, argued the failure of the Program presents a significant threat to the public’s safety, health, and financial security that needs to be thoroughly investigated and corrected.

Contact: Tom Devine, Government Accountability Project
Dr. Darrell Whitman: email: publicsafety4america(at)

4/27/2017 AFGE 2391 Steward Darrell Whitman Public Letter To AFGE President David Cox On 2017 Workers Memorial Day

April 27, 2017
J. David Cox
American Federation of Government Employees
Washington, D.C.

Dear Brother Cox,

I wanted to take the opportunity of Workers Memorial Day to write you a follow up letter to my letter of last June. As you might recall, in that letter I told you about the years-long struggle by union stewards and employees in the Department of Labor to protect the rights of workers who reported significant risks to the nation’s safety, health, and financial security. It was a very expensive struggle for many of us, and by the end in 2015 Department of Labor senior administrators purged an entire section of the OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program of investigators who openly objected to the corruption of the program.

During the five-year struggle with the Department of Labor, local AFGE union stewards performed heroically, often devoting their own time and resources to the fight. Sadly, the initial battle was lost in part because they didn’t have the active support of the national union leadership. When I asked for your help last year to support the continuing struggle for an independent, outside investigation of the corruption, you responded by tasking a member of AFGE’s national legal team to support the effort. Then in September, you secured a prominent role for the union in the investigation of the Whistleblower Protection Program’s role in the Wells Fargo national financial fraud scandal. However, neither initiative gained traction, and following the election Secretary Perez quietly closed the Wells Fargo investigation before it had begun.

The two lessons I learned since I my first letter are: first, political promises are mostly hollow, particularly when they concerning closely examining corruption in government; and second, the corruption we experienced in the Department of Labor is not an isolated case, but extends widely throughout the federal government. The two federal agencies designed to protect federal employees who report corruption - the Merit System Protection Board and the Office of Special Counsel, are at best dysfunctional and at worst themselves a major source of government corruption. Their record of accepting and processing complaints by federal employees is abysmal, and they rarely protect federal employees and more commonly act to protect managers from accountability. This has led to a generally chilled atmosphere for federal employees and encouraged scofflaw managers to believe they are beyond accountability. This cannot continue without threatening the authority of the government itself.

The failure of the MSPB and OSC to do their jobs leaves the AFGE as the principal defender of federal workers and the public interest. It’s a formidable responsibility, but a responsibility that has been carried by organized labor for most of the last century. Also, because of the corruption in the Whistleblower Protection Program, the public is at great risk from preventable safety and health violations, and financial fraud. Protecting the public is a primary responsibility for our government, and federal employees are potentially the first responders to ensure that protection. My own experience is that the great majority are both willing and capable to provide that protection, but are often hamstrung by incompetent and/or self-serving managers and administrators. The question is, is AFGE ready, willing, and able to meet the challenge of protecting federal workers so that they can protect the public.

It’s rare that life gives us a second chance. But today, you have a second chance to not only join, but lead the call for Congress to authorize a special prosecutor to investigate wide-spread corruption in the federal regulatory system. This call is now being organized by the Government Accountability Project, supported by a growing national network of whistleblowers and their supporters. While the call is to investigate, the purpose of the call is to restore basic respect for workers and the public interest by recovering the integrity of our federal government. Every federal employee and every worker in the private sector, whether or not they are union members, are at increased risk of injury, death, and financial loss if workers who report potential risks are not protected. The call should be extended to all AFGE members, because they are the most directly aggrieved and have the most to gain if and when accountability is restored to the management of the federal government.

The chill wind of retaliation that is now blowing everywhere has been gathering speed over the last four decades, and will continue to blow and gain strength until and unless we act to stop it. As the evolving Wells Fargo story consumer fraud continues, it points to a culture of corruption in the corporate workplace exacerbated by corruption in the federal workplace. The cure for the corruption is already in place with federal statutes. But to be effective, these statutes must be enforced. If we are not a nation of law and equal justice under the law, we become a nation of self-interest and the corruption that follows. We must stand up for the American worker and the public interest now, and this is what GAP and the whistleblowers are doing with this call. Please see it as an opportunity for AFGE and organized labor more generally to exercise leadership. The American public is asking for it, and we can provide it if we choose.

So, please join with us to honor our history of representing the public interest by supporting the work of our union sisters and brothers on behalf of the public interest. In doing so, you will restore faith and trust in our federal government that has become seriously eroded.

Brother Darrell Whitman
Steward, AFGE Local 2391
AFGE Representative to the San Francisco, Central Labor Council

Johnny Burris J.P. Morgan Financial Advisor On Why He Became A Whistleblower & The Public
Johnny Burris was a J.P. Morgan financial advisor in Sun City Arizona who was illegally coerced by the bank to sell company owned financial instruments that were more costly to his clients. He challenged this and was fired and retaliated against for his whistleblowing. He discusses how top executives were aware of these illegal violation of banking laws and how this is a serious issue for the public.
This presentation was made at the 2017 Workers Memorial Day on April 27, 2017 in San Francisco.
Additional media:
It was sponsored by Injured Workers National Network
Production of Labor Video Project

Blowing The Whistle On Wells Fargo & J.P. Morgan Yesenia Guitron & Johnny Burris Speak Out On 2017 Workers Memorial Day
Yesenia Guitron who was was a teller at the Wells Fargo bank in St. Helena, California and Johnny Burris who was a J.P. Morgan Financial Advisor in Sun City Arizona both were bullied and terminated for blowing the whistle on criminal activity by these large national banks. They both also filed complaints to OSHA and OSHA stalled and refused to investigate in the the case of Yesenia Guitron. The government still refused to prosecute the managers and executives who were committing illegal activities and engaged in a RICO to cover-up their violation of banking, fraud and other violations of the law.
They spoke at the San Francisco Workers Memorial Day meeting at ILWU Local 34 and the meeting was sponsored by Injured Workers National Network IWNN.
For more media:
For more information:
Injured Workers National Network IWNN
Production Of Labor Video Project
§OSHA WPP Investigator and Lawyer Darrell Whitman
by Darrell Whitman Monday Jun 5th, 2017 9:29 AM
Darrell Whitman who is a former US OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program investigator and lawyer discovered that there was a culture of corruption at OSHA including former DOL Secretary Tom Perez. Perez and other top officials of OSHA and the DOL conspired to prevent an independent investigation of the systemic workplace bullying, retaliations and terminations of investigators who were trying to see if workers had been terminated for making health and safety complaints. Whitman discovered that the department management officials had been colluding with corporations like FedEx, Lockheed Martin and PG&E to stop the protection of health and safety whistleblowers
FedEx was one of the companies that Darrell Whitman was investigating after mechanics at LAX complained that planes were not properly protected from rust. They were retaliated against and the company was secretly colluding with officials in OSHA and the DOL to limit their liability and to allow continued retaliation against the OSHA health and safety whistleblowers.