$198.00 donated in past month
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay FeatureRelated Categories: Santa Cruz Indymedia | U.S. | Health, Housing, and Public Services | Immigrant Rights
U.S. Supreme Court Lets Stand Rulings Prohibiting Anti-Immigrant Housing Ordinances
NEW YORK - The U.S. Supreme Court on March 3 declined to hear two prominent cases involving anti-immigrant local ordinances in Hazleton, Pennsylvania and Farmers Branch, Texas that would have denied housing to immigrants that the cities considered "illegal aliens." The decision will let stand lower court rulings in the 3rd and 5th Circuits, respectively, that found the ordinances unconstitutional and permanently prohibited the ordinances from taking effect.
Comment from Omar Jadwat, supervising attorney, ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project:
"The Hazleton and Farmers Branch anti-immigrant ordinances have repeatedly been found unconstitutional by federal trial and appeals courts. Today, the ordinances' supporters failed in their final, last ditch attempt to resurrect these laws, which have been blocked for years without ever going into effect. Now that these appeals are over, we look forward to Farmers Branch and Hazleton joining cities across the nation that are looking at ways to make their cities welcoming places for immigrants, rather writing hostility and discrimination into municipal law."
Comment from Terri Burke, executive director, ACLU of Texas:
"Texas owes a great deal to our immigrant friends, neighbors, and family members, who contribute to our continued economic prosperity. With the court’s decision today, we can finally close the book on Farmers Branch’s misguided and discriminatory attempts to exclude hard-working immigrants from our communities. We know the residents of Farmers Branch must be thrilled that this costly, tax-payer funded legal battle is finally over."
Comment from Foster Maer, senior attorney, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, and co-counsel in the Hazleton case:
"Hazleton's Latino community, the target of Hazleton's anti-immigrant ordinances, can finally breathe a sigh of relief after 7 years. The Town can no longer target them for harassment and expulsion. Though Latinos across the country can also feel heartened that their towns can no longer take similar acts against them, they now must remain on guard as anti-immigrant forces will come up with new ways to try to drive them out."
Comment from Witold Walczak, legal director, ACLU of Pennsylvania, and co-counsel in the Hazleton case:
"It's time Hazleton put this ugly history in the rear view mirror and started to focus on becoming a welcoming and productive city."
Comment from Thomas Willkinson, Jr., Cozen O’Connor, co-counsel in the Hazleton case:
"The district court and Third Circuit properly concluded that Hazleton's efforts to regulate immigration at the local level unduly interfered with a fundamental function of the federal government. The regulations also had the unfortunate byproduct of splintering the community and making lawful immigrants feel unwelcome."
Comment from Nina Perales, MALDEF, co-counsel in the Hazleton case:
"The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected the City’s final appeal. After more than 7 years of litigation, during which the City lost at every stage, it is time for Farmers Branch to let go of its immigration ordinance. Today’s ruling is a strong message that local immigration laws are unconstitutional and hurt cities by wasting precious resources and undermining community relationships."
Background on the Hazleton case
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Pennsylvania, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Community Justice Project and the law firm Cozen O'Connor have been challenging anti-immigrant housing and employment ordinances on behalf of Hazleton residents, landlords and business owners since the first ordinance was enacted in August 2006. None of the ordinances has ever gone into effect.
The Hazleton ordinances would have barred individuals the city defined as "illegal aliens" from rental housing and would have punished Hazleton residents and businesses for engaging in a broad range of commercial interactions with individuals who could not prove they had federal work authorization.
Following a two-week trial, the federal trial court in Scranton, PA permanently struck down the ordinances in 2007. The city appealed that decision, and lost again in the federal appeals court in 2010. The case went back to the appeals court in August 2012 for review in light of the Supreme Court's rulings on two Arizona immigration laws in 2011 and 2012. The civil rights groups successfully argued that those cases reaffirmed the judgment that Hazleton's ordinances are unconstitutional.