top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Desperate Times, Pacific Street Santa Cruz Edition: Businesses Breaking Laws

by Auntie Imperial
Aside from the plainly observable fact that no one is enforcing the Dog Laws downtown despite the fact that the temporary removal of the ban has not yet become effective, yesterday and today I focused on obstruction of sidewalks, city facilities by merchants, state traffic law violations, and one other thing...

Aside from the plainly observable fact that no one is enforcing the Dog Laws downtown despite the fact that the temporary removal of the ban has not yet become effective, yesterday and today I focused on obstruction of sidewalks, city facilities by merchants, state traffic law violations, and one other thing, dealt with by the city years ago when the residents of El Centro Housing complained to the city about Hoffman's restaurant's exhaust smoke.

dfTTI.jpg

The scenarios, and mind you I am not a specialist on sidewalk laws in Santa Cruz so I may have left out potential H&S codes, city infractions, state laws, and EPA violations, are as follows:

Blocking a crosswalk, impeding pedestrians attempting to cross a street.
(This picture and the one following are about a month or so old...)

4udpc.jpg

4udpc.jpg

Santa Cruz Police Supervisor's personal 6 hour parking spot.

soSVv.jpg

Illegal public camping, day and night. Including the blocking of neighboring doorways and '14 foot rule' violations.

xcPyK.jpg

Sidewalk Blockage... Texter Hazard Ahead

tj5cN.jpg

Blocking extensive portions of sidewalk precluding people from getting to their cars/parking meters... (Something the Christians who come downtown to feed people at tables are constantly harassed about.) along with entirely blocking a city facility, a public bench, all day, leaving perhaps two feet, enough to use it as their own personal shoe fitting area.

Note that the clown performs for HOURS, again violating performance ordinances, or perhaps not. In discussions with this joker a few years ago he had the audacity to tell me that a business, Marini's, PAID HIM to stand in front of their store to preclude other performers from using the space. If so, he is STILL in violation of the law, and further, if that paid-for-performance status is also the case here, since he IS NOT an itinerant street performer but a hired paid performer, he should have a business license unlike the average busker, performer, or handcrafter.

o29Wh.jpg

grNzk.jpg

hH16c.jpg
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Becky Johnson
I love that shot of the police supervisor's car parked at a red curb and blocking a fireplug. Yes, "invisible" dogs have been noted before. Sign should read "No hippie kid's puppies downtown" for the way its enforced. Years ago, activist James Nay and Robert Norse attempted to make a citizens arrest on a SCPD officer when he set a table up next to Marini's Ice Cream and handed out paper badges to kids on Halloween. The non-commercial display device was well within the 14 feet from a building! No cop would take their complaint!
by Nuff said
Watching the ineffective, repetitive, egocentric demands of Auntie and Becky...year after year...to no avail....while the majority of the community derides them as negative influences whose opinions aren't supported....makes me smile, and think that "Hey, maybe it's NOT all bad and we AREN'T going to hell in a hand basket".


(But Auntie? If it would make you feel less abused? I'd be happy to post many, many pictures of illegal homeless campers, drunks passed out on the city benches, and homeless-by-choice nomads (Thanks for that one Robert!) to offset your sense of outrage and being singled out. I guarantee I can provide at least 10 examples for any one you can.).

by Auntie Imperial
640_after.jpg
Equal justice under the law... Just like you, that's what I want.

Or maybe you don't.

Until every citizen get it... You have no peace. The now destroyed "Imagine Fraud" panhandler parking meters stand as testament to that simple reality.


by The Pope
On Sunday August 1, the sidewalk in front of Pacific Wave was packed so full of that store's merchandise that only one pedestrian at a time could squeeze through to pass the business. It was totally crass, I would never do that as a business owner, especially downtown.

We must of course blame the Santa Cruz City Council, the Santa Cruz Police Department, the Downtown Association, and those crass businesses who participated beyond what would constitute a fair use of the outdoor space.
by Kc
The City and the SCPD have always favored business over all else. That is what makes the City money to support its residents. Ryan Coonerty himself e-mailed me explaining part of the reason the SCPD didn't receive any cuts in funding for FY 2011 is that:

"Studies show that the first thing that shoppers require is a sense of safety."

Ryan is obviously worried about business, especially in the downtown area. All or most of these ordinances have been constructed to gear toward driving the so-called "homeless" out of the downtown area and out of Santa Cruz so the 'shoppers' have a more sense of 'safety'.

It has been true for decades if not centuries; those with more money (thus more power) are able to obtain more liberties and desires than those with less money. Class division is the issue here I think. Businesses (and the PD) having these liberties lucidly exemplifies what class these ordinances are actually tailored to.

Although the photo of the "campers" in front of the movie theater MAY still be on private property, that line got much larger extending onto Pacific Avenue. The reason they didn't get camping tickets?!?...Do I hear discriminatory non-prosecution echoing between Regal Cinemas entrances and the obstructed sidewalks of Pac Av?

The City does not want to hurt the businesses here in Santa Cruz any more than the eroding economy has. Does allowing obstruction of sidewalks and excessive smoke and illegal camping by businesses justify the City of Santa Cruz leaders' desire to keep cash flowing into Santa Cruz so they can "properly" care for the residents of Santa Cruz?

The end does not justify the means my friends.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$135.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network