top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Alameda County Democratic Committee Fraudulently Endorses Regressive Tax Measure

by David Howard
Violating traditional rules and protocol which calls for hearing both sides of an issue, County Democrats last night endorsed a regressive school tax measure that gives big corporations a tax break at the expense of average homeowners

Bucking the national and statewide Democratic principles of supporting progressive taxation - the idea that the more you earn, the more tax you pay - the Alameda County Democratic Central Committee has endorsed a tax which increases taxes on the poor and middle class while lowering them on big corporations.

Measure A is a local school parcel tax that will increase school taxes by 65% for the average homeowner in Alameda, yet would implement a $7,999 tax cap for the biggest corporations in Alameda. The $7,999 cap represents a 16% reduction for big business from the tax cap in the existing school parcel tax.

Additionally, the average homeowner would pay 32 cents/sq ft, while Alameda Towne Center, with over $100 million in annual retail sales, would pay an effective tax rate of 1 cents/sq ft. The Oakland Raiders, whose headquarters is in Alameda, and who enjoy annual revenues over $200 million, would pay an effective tax rate of 8 cents/sq ft.

In taking this stand Alameda County Democrats are also taking on their own Democratic president and governor. President Obama and newly elected Governor Jerry Brown are strong supporters of charters schools and are even stronger supporters of treating all students equally.

Critics of the tax, and of the Committee's endorsement are calling the endorsement fraudulent because it was brought before the Committee and voted upon without being scheduled in advance, and opponents of the measure were not given equal time to present their argument. Critics say that such actions violate traditional committee rules and ethics.

Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
'3rd Party'
Sun, Jan 9, 2011 2:36PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$260.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network