top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

SEIU Union Office Attacked 5/23

by Wildcat Anarchists
On May 23, some anonymous actors left acid on a window of the SEIU union office on Mission St in Santa Cruz, and spraypainted the walls red and black with anarchy signs and revolutionary slogans:
"Solidarid@d Puerto Rico" SEIU is currently engaged in trying to break and control a nation-wide teachers' strike against the puppet government of Puerto Rico, a US colony. This is a perfect example of the role unions inevitably play in co-opting, selling out, and even crushing real strikes and revolutionary upsurges. For more documentation of this treachery, visit pr.indymedia.org en espanol, or simply search the internet for "puerto rico teachers."

"Support the janitors" on strike in San Jose, "not the union" that will order them back to work for a few dollars. May you never have to clean up after technocrats (the "little Eichmanns" of America) again. In this vein, we support the University of California service workers who will be striking on the 4th and 5th of June (unfortunately represented by AFSCME), and encourage them to "wildcat" strike when the two-day strike proves unsatisfactory. May you never have to clean up after and take care of drunken frat boys and sorority girls again.

"Hang the bosses by the guts of the bureaucrats!"

P.S. We forgot to add, fuck you city councilmember Tony Madrigal, and "professor of negotiaton" Bill Monning too. There's no such thing as a working class politician, and we would hate them even if there were.
§Support Janitors
by ~Bradley (bradley [at] riseup.net)
wild-cat_5-24-08.jpg
I won't comment on the action, but here are some photos of the graffiti and links so people can get a little better context

Bay Area Janitors Go On Strike
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/05/22/18500744.php

Puerto Rico:

Juan Gonzalez
New York labor leader Dennis Rivera in shady Puerto Rico union deal
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2008/02/29/2008-02-29_new_york_labor_leader_dennis_rivera_in_s.html

Puerto Rico: Teachers battle unionbusting
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/mar2008/prts-m03.shtml

Teachers Strike Stops Classes in Puerto Rico
http://www.labornotes.org/node/1580

Underpaid and dissed, Puerto Rico’s teachers may walk out in defiance of anti-strike ban
http://www.uft.org/news/teacher/briefs/underpaid_and_dissed/

A Case of Labor Colonialism: AFL-CIO and Change to Win vs. the FMPR
http://pr.indymedia.org/news/2008/02/31370.php

PUERTO RICO: Teachers' Assembly Agrees to Begin Strike
http://www.indymedia.org/en/2008/03/902196.shtml
§Bureaucrats
by ~Bradley
bureaucrats_5-24-08.jpg
§Support Janitors Not Union
by ~Bradley
support-janitors_5-24-08.jpg
§SEIU Local 521
by ~Bradley
seiu-521_5-24-08.jpg
§Context: Puerto Rico's Teachers Rebellion, from socialist worker
by not a socialist
5/26/08 - Puerto Rico's teacher rebellion

Socialist unionists discuss strikes, privatization

Some 250 teachers and education activists gathered in Los Angeles in April at the eighth Trinational Conference to Defend Public Education. For three days, representatives from several cities in the U.S., plus Canada, Mexico and Puerto Rico plotted a response to the creep of privatization into our schools.

In conversations, speeches and workshops, teachers detailed the many facets of what neoliberal education policies look like in different locations--for example, the gutting of the public education system in New Orleans. There were also the faces of the fightback--teachers from British Colombia, Puerto Rico and Oaxaca brought the stories of strikes that can help point the way forward for everyone.

During the conference, Gillian Russom and Sarah Knopp interviewed participants to share some of their lessons with SocialistWorker.org readers. The interviews will run in a series over the next week.

This first installment features an interview with Rafael Feliciano Hernández, president of the Teachers Federation of Puerto Rico. Teachers on the island struck earlier this year to try to win collective bargaining rights; oppose Law 45, which makes it illegal for teachers to strike; stop the transformation of Puerto Rican schools into charters; and stand up to reprisals against teachers who were organizing.

Series: Teachers roundtable

Teachers and education activists gathered at the Trinational Conference to Defend Public Education to document the different aspects of the neoliberal attack on public education and take stock of the lessons of the struggle against it. In this series of interviews, teachers from across North America and the Caribbean shared their experiences.

Rafael Feliciano Hernández
Puerto Rico's teacher rebellion

HOW DID you build up to the strike?

THIS WASN'T the first time on strike for the Teachers' Federation. In 1993, we had a one-day strike against charter schools. It was a big defeat that led to the demoralization of militants. The corruption and anti-democratic practices inside the union became extreme.

But between 2003 and 2008, we have radically transformed a union that had been a conservative force in the Puerto Rican labor movement. The student rebellion contributed to the teacher rebellion. The students put up a banner, and their resistance was transmitted to the level of the teachers.

In 2004, we disaffiliated from the American Federation of Teachers because their colonial relationship to us was impeding the development of our struggle.

From that point on, we had many short strikes around specific demands to improve education. They were all illegal. We had delegates' meetings of hundreds of teachers. The existence of political groups in the teachers' union facilitated the process. We had open debate in which everyone could expound their point of view, and this neutralized the agents of the state within the union.

Rafael Feliciano Hernández (Sarah Knopp | SW)Rafael Feliciano Hernández (Sarah Knopp | SW)

We set the date of the strike for February 21. It was seen as a scandal that the teachers were talking about this. There were 1,300 representatives at our delegates' assembly meeting, and we voted to strike by 1,200 to 15.

Some 20,000 teachers supported the strike; 8,000 of them were on the picket line. During the strike, thousands of publications were produced, which created a great level of discussion. It was led from the bottom up. Leadership from the top kills the capacity to struggle.

HOW DID teachers feel about the illegality of the strike?

IT IS important to say that the immense majority of teachers had never before participated in strikes or work stoppages. They had to overcome fears, threats and pressure that management and its allies used to paralyze the strikers. This occurred in the context of the repressive Law 45, which prohibits strikes and criminalizes all actions that imply the interruption of labor in public agencies.

What else to read

Many of the issues discussed at the Trinational Conference and in these interviews are taken up in a paper written by Steve Miller and Jack Gerson, "The Corporate Surge Against Public Schools."

For a more general look at the imposition of neoliberal economic policies, read Naomi Klein's most recent book The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.

Jonathan Kozol has written numerous books exposing unequal conditions in U.S. schools, including Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools and The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America.

Kozol's interview in the International Socialist Review, "Change can't come without protest," takes up the issues in his books, plus the question of education activism.

The state made it a conflict between the FMPR and the state. All the media were against us. They were joined by both the AFL-CIO and Change to Win, which didn't have links with the communities or specific struggles.

The SEIU intervened with the Association of Teachers. Dennis Rivera and Roberto Pagán, among others, pressured the governor not to enter into agreements with the FMPR. This paralyzed the possibility of negotiation at the height of the struggle.

We didn't win our central demand, which was a collective bargaining agreement. We did win a raise, and the promise of a future raise, as well as an agreement that there will be no charter schools in Puerto Rico.

We also developed a new layer of leaders and militants: 8,000 teachers who no longer just talk about struggle because they've done it. They speak from a class perspective. It's not just a matter of dollars and cents. The strike process is an emancipatory and decolonizing experience. We gained a lot: the union and the country are not the same.

Would we have been able to do all this without the political groups within the union, which made the connections with what's happening in the world, with the war, with the gap between rich and poor? I think no. The workers would have been too constricted by the bosses' vision of the world.

DO YOU think the strike was a victory?

When we ended the strike, I was so happy, because there were no repression and reprisals. People were ecstatic. Other people asked me, 'Why are you so happy? We didn't win collective bargaining.'

But for us, the strike was an act of liberation. A high percentage of the 26,000 teachers fought actively. The only way to do this was to be democratic. We all decided to go out, and we all decided to go back.

(socialistworker.org)
§more context & background information
by not a socialist
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 23, 2008

Contacts: Normahiram Perez Rodriguez 646-750-2704
Judy Sheridan-Gonzalez 718-601-4901

SEIU Urged: End Attacks Against Puerto Rico Teachers
Broad Coalition Supports Puerto Rico’s Independent Union

News Conference – Wednesday, May 28 at 10:30 a.m.

A broad coalition of activists will gather Wednesday, May 28 in New York City to express support for Puerto Rico’s embattled teachers and schoolchildren, to protest the decision of SEIU’s leadership to launch an attack on the existing teachers union and to exhort SEIU to cease this activity.

Rafael Feliciano Hernández, President of the Federación de Maestros de Puerto Rico (FMPR--the Puerto Rican teachers’ union) will be joined at the event by members of the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), CUNY’s Professional Staff Congress (PSC), SEIU, the New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA) and other local labor leaders, along with the National Nurses Organizing Committee (NNOC), community and religious organizations, local student activists, and concerned relatives of Island students.

WHAT: News Conference Insisting SEIU Cease Attacks on Teachers Union
WHO: Puerto Rican, Labor, Education, Religious and Progressive Activists
WHEN: Wednesday, May 28, 10:30 am
WHERE: Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration, 475 Park Avenue South at 32nd Street

SEIU--facing a well-publicized internal battle--begins its Convention in Puerto Rico next week in the shadow of its attempt to take over the Island’s 42,000-member teachers’ union. SEIU’s “raid” comes on the heels of sustained efforts by the Puerto Rico Teachers Union (FMPR)—united with parents and students--to fight against:


horrific educational conditions

privatization of schools

the negative effects of “No Child Left Behind”

government assaults on democratic school leadership committees

repressive labor laws

abysmal salaries—monthly average of $1600 with living costs higher than those in the US.

After nearly three years of working without a contract, the teachers unanimously voted to strike in a mass union meeting of over 7,000 members in November 2007. While negotiations continued, sources report that SEIU leader Dennis Rivera was meeting with Puerto Rico Governor Anibal Acevedo Vila.

According to the New York Daily News, the Governor told Rivera that the teachers’ union is “yours to take.” Previously El Diaro-La Prensa reported that Rivera had discussed the teachers union with Acevedo in addition to possible SEIU monetary support for the Governor, who has recently been indicted on corruption charges.

The Puerto Rican government declared the teachers’ strike illegal, based on the vote alone—the actual strike was not called until late February 2008--and moved to decertify FMPR. Almost simultaneously, SEIU announced that the Island’s union of school principals and supervisors was affiliating with SEIU—and would attempt to take over the teachers’ union.

In the aftermath of the 10 day strike that paralyzed the nation’s public schools with unprecedented support and participation from teachers, students and parents, FMPR continues its work as the representative of the Island’s teachers, negotiating with the government over school conditions while fighting for recognition as the bargaining unit.

The Delegate Assembly of New York City’s United Federation of Teachers (UFT) declared solidarity with the Puerto Rico teachers and voted unanimously to “support the Puerto Rican teachers in their struggle to be treated with dignity.” CUNY’s Professional Staff Congress (PSC) resolved to “participate in strike support efforts and solidarity with the striking teachers of the FMPR.” The struggle was discussed at NYC’s Central Labor Council, and the California Federation of Teachers, having sent funds already to support FMPR, plans to urge the AFT to do so as well.

SEIU leadership is in the midst of a tremendous internal struggle with sectors within the union advocating for greater member democracy. As these members engage President Andy Stern and other leaders inside the Convention Hall—ironically to be held in Puerto Rico--FMPR teachers will surely protest what they view as SEIU’s sabotage of the struggle for quality education on their island nation. SEIU leaders’ apparent collusion with the government/employer of teachers in Puerto Rico echoes similar accusations of what critics characterize as a recent trend toward “sweetheart deals” with employers in the private sector on the mainland.

Here in NY, 1199/SEIU, one of the international’s locals with an exemplary reputation as a progressive union, recently launched a series of attempted raids against the New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA), which represents Registered Nurses. These raids occur as NYSNA’s nurses battle hardened employers who are attempting to diminish nurses’ power as they advocate for quality care for their patients, further escalating the inter-union wars on the mainland.

Rather than destabilizing already difficult situations faced by unions--particularly in a nation such as Puerto RIco that has its own particularities--SEIU’s leaders need to focus on their members as they grapple with the difficult questions that face trade unionists today.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by John Thielking (pagesincolor [at] riseup.net)
Just so you know, Santa Cruz city council members get paid about $1000 per month for their trouble and Mike Rotkin once commented that he works about 100 hours per week. SEIU union reps work 50-60 hours per week including weekends and evenings, with weekend and evening shifts scheduled on as little as 24 hours notice, while the people they represent often work 40 hours 9-5 M-F. Yes the union brought you the weekend, but often the leaders and reps we are so quick to criticize are working like dogs so you can have a beer and watch TV on Saturday. Go ahead and attend the union meetings for the SEIU and see if you can get a resolution passed to support your cause. A sleepy San Jose group of union rank and file unanimously passed a resolution calling for impeachment of Cheney, so anything is possible if you put your mind to it. It would have helped if your first action was not to throw acid on the window though.
by to redeem the labor movement
SEIU is the largest union in the country with 1.9 million members. It is growing the fastest too, up from 1.3 million when I was an organizer there about 6 years ago. I wholeheartedly support efforts at pressuring SEIU to be more democratic and act more like a union. The local chapters have little autonomy in spite of often heroic effort on the part of member activists (rank and file leaders i.e. non-staff member leaders whether steward, local elected leader, or militants) and staff to chart a course toward member democracy. In fact, most locals have been consolidated into regional units to allow easier control from the international and allowing Andy Stern (the democratic center of the union) to eliminate local leadership and select the new bureaucrats that will administer the locals. I salute the rank and file leaders and many of the democratic minded staffers who are trying to foster union democracy and exhort them to stand up publicly and loudly condemn the union busting that SEIU international is practicing in Puerto Rico as well as calling out the people in SEIU who advocate unilateralism and undemocratic practices that undermine the vision and passion of the rank and file. The rank and file would fight against those practices if they knew about them, but they don't because SEIU (and all the major business unions) are undemocratic in practice due to the labor laws that they conform to in order to remain legal and legitimate and the fact that most contracts in this country surrender the right to strike, the greatest power of workers.

Check out this SEIU rank and file site maintained by members who are fighting to control their union:
http://www.reformseiu.org/

Business unions are most of what is left of the labor movement in this country and much of the dues money is spent on paying off politicians to get them to pressure corporations. SEIU in particular focuses their organizing efforts on getting partnership agreements with bosses of companies where employers agree to allow "card check neutrality" (a simple 50%+1 vote instead of an inefficient NLRB government mediated election) in exchange for SEIU lobbying the politicians (who have received so much dues money) to give those employers sweeter contracts (of taxpayer money). This is all done without talking to the rank and file members of SEIU and totally independent of the workers at the "new organizing targets."

Also, SEIU lied to its rank and file saying that the Labor Notes conference this year (the biggest organized institution of lefty rank and file labor activists in the U.S.) was a union busting group hosting a leader from the California Nurses Association (who SEIU is in a territorial dispute with) and sent two busloads of SEIU rank and file activists to disrupt the conference. When labor notes organizers blocked the entrance to the SEIU bloc, there was a scuffle, the cops got called, and a homecare rank and file leader from within SEIU had a heart attack and died.
http://www.labornotes.org/node/1604

SEIU and business unions routinely betray of the principles of mutual aid, solidarity, and self determination that spawned the labor movement and inspire every new struggle against the bosses. That is why the working class movement in this country is so tiny, so silent, and so ineffective. There was no general strike in 2003 to stop the invasion of Iraq. There was only lip service for respecting the rights of migrant workers when the largest general strike and largest demonstration in the history of this country was pulled off by the Immigrant Rights movement on May Day 2006. The business unions did not join the general strike because they cannot allow workers to vote on things like that that would lead to illegal strike action or else they would lose their charters from the government (and their money) and sadly, because the business unions do no member education to counter the racism of the fascist media, except on who to vote for in electoral politics, few members joined the strike.

Holding SEIU's feet to the fire is a solid contribution to the labor movement, which is bigger than any one union or union federation. The labor movement is the idea that everyone has a right to fight for a better life and mutual aid and solidarity make that self determination possible.

For a world free of bosses and bureaucrats,
Anarchism
by from the politicians trough!
Not the organizing fund.
by Bust Union MISleaders Not Unions
I hate to break the news to this daring band of Anarchists that attacked a Workers organization office but the teachers in Puerto Rico also belong to a Union !
Would you attack their bldg in the name of '' Wildcat Anarchism '' ? If so you would be understandably regarded as pro- govt. provocateurs .
I personally don't think you are. i think you're well meaning but stupidly ultra left idiots !
By the way do not even remotely consider trying a stunt like that at some Bay Area Union halls in particular . Believe me if you did and some rank and file members who, despite how much they might oppose this or that official see the Union hall as THEIR hall, caught you in the act--- well lets just say you might actually be glad when the cops arrive !
by WARNING
The above commenter shares many similarities with a pro-government provocateur. I personally don't think they are, however. But if you were looking for a good example of counter-intelligence and psychological warfare being used by a hostile entity, look no further than the above comment.
by Puzzled
Was the comment by '' Warning '' directed at the person '' Bust Union misleaders not Unions '' or the "'Wildcat Anarchists '' ?
If it's the former i don't understand what's so sinister about stating the obvious , if you attack a Union hall most workers of that union are going to see it as a attack on them (and react accordily )
by Annoyed
What the hell good did that do? Besides make anarchists look silly? It's about more than spraypaint and breaking windows you know.
by the words of Utah Phillips
Listen now:
Copy the code below to embed this audio into a web page:
by (A)nnie Mall
seiu's likely got plenty of corruption, but this seems pretty foolish when theres cops, destruction vehicles on the university, more corporate sprawl spreading over the county and plenty of more worthwhile targets around.

go smash a mcdonalds or something you nitwits, if national seiu's got your undies in a twist try subverting it, or attacking the specifically known to be corrupt members, or something a teeny fraction more thought out than etching the windows of a small local branch.

if you wanna go do that kind of stuff, you also know where the recruiting station is.

i mean fuck, priorities?

people down with the (A), wise up and burn the briges to your sworn enemies, not your potential allies.

by Tony Sanchez
Whoever these alleged '' Wildcats '' may be i hope they are reading these comments . These are just the tip of the iceberg . I was at a liitle house party today where several rank and file SEIU members were present . None were full time officials . Two are shop stewards . All are opposed to what the "' Stern Gang '' is doing, including in Puerto Rico . But all thought the '' Wildcat Anarchists '' were at best , fools . at worst., agents .
Like some earlier said i think the former . But those guys need to think hard about their actions .I doubt if very many if any of the Union janitors they claim to support back their raid .
by Tony Sanchez
i am a former member of the SEIU and before that the Laborers Union. Due to corporate ''downsizing '' i'm currently at a Non union job, doing the same work but at only 70% of my previous pay .
Benefits are very limited and grievance procedures don't exist . Unions are worthless? Not in the real world .
by Big Bill Hayward
Whoever did the "Wildcat Anarchist" spray painting were either in the employ of a Pinkerton-type anti-labor agency or the local cops, but clearly acting in the interests of the ruling class. Or it might be some new COINTELPRO formation. The FBI perhaps?

Or simply the immature act of Social Fascists. If so, should rank and file members ever catch them, they should take them to their parents and demand that their allowance be used to repaint the union hall AND that their Playstation be taken away until they learn to read.

Big Bill
by Get over yourselves
Accept the reality that some overly zealous and self-satisfied in their opinion individual did it.........the feds and cops do not care that much about SEIU.

by Big Bill
>

How do you know, officer?

Spoken like a true agent of the state!
i do not think the ''Wildcats'' are a false flag cover for some sort of Police action . I echo the other commentators who think that they are a group pf politically childish activists who reacted badly to a real crisis and some outrageous actions by some SEIU tops .
But make no mistake , the people that manage the Govt. of behalf of their corporate sponsors DO care about the SEIU, Teamsters and the other unions . Especially their potential . Look at the threats the then Attorney-General Ridge directed at the much smaller (but powerful ) ILWU during their lockout in 2003 .
Look at the reactions of the govt. most closely allied to the US , The British, during the 1984 British Miners strike . Practically every cop in England, Wales ,and Scotland were mobilized to break that strike . MI5 and Special branch did their best to infiltrate the Union's and strike planning leadership. And it's a safe bet that their American ''cousins '' lent a hand .
On a smaller scale there are literally of dozens of union busting law firms and ''security ' agencies (usually staffed by ex , and not so ex. cops and FBI agents )
So yeah I don't think real union busters were involved in what happened on May 23 , but that doesn't mean they aren't watching !
by Forensic Expert
O.K. everyone, cool down.

Take a look at where the graffiti is located. Then look at the pallets and chairs. Whoever did this probably stood less than 4' 6". They used the pallets and chairs to attempt to reach higher, hence the incredibly sloppy handwriting. They obviously are elementary school kids doing this as a prank. No adult claiming to be an Anarchist would be so foolishly anti-working class.

Weigh the evidence yourself.
by expurt?
Yeah, I hear it's all the rage these days; 10 year old kids go out and do graffiti based upon obscure political and labor related issues.


Way to break the case, Forensic Expert Clouseau!
by UnionMaid
Looking at the photos of the graffitti at SEIU, I was sickened. The slogan "support janitors not union" is just puzzling beyond belief. For many years, janitors have struggled to gain higher wages by linking the work they do to incredible corporate profits, asking only to share in a teeny piece of that pie.

They chose to gain better wages and working conditions by unionizing, in this case, with SEIU.

So what's wrong with these pictures? The arrogance of alleged anarchists who seem comfortable destroying the exterior of a union hall, where workers gather to seek and plan power for themselves struggling against intractable employers and bosses.....

Alleged anarchists, whose lashing out has no discipline or analysis behind their actions, in a free-for-all of paint sprayed misguided expressions...

The pictures feel violent and out of control and just so far off-base. I work in the area and now feel nervous about going to work tomorrow.

In closing, the attack on Tony Madrigal and Bill Monning was the clincher in how ridiculous the message and messengers are. Stop and think: one, only the second person of color ever elected to the Santa Cruz City Council, suffering the attacks for calling out police profiling of people of color, and the other, Bill Monning, a candidate for the Assembly, having worked with the United Farmworkers Union to stop the use of toxic chemicals being sprayed on farmworkers.

Attacking a union hall in the name of what? This isn't anarchy, it's random property violence. To attack a union hall insults all workers everywhere struggling for a better life for themselves and all of us.
by Forensic Expert
No, not 10 years old. Based on the spelling mistakes, I'd say 11 or 12. Still kids. Probably just copied the slogans off their older sister or brother's middle or high school notebooks. Crimethinc is reaching lower and lower in its recruiting these days.
by Nick Steinmeier
SEIU Local 521 is one of the most member run democratic Unions in the country. These little kids should have don't a little investigating prior to attempting to destroy the hall that workers build. In case some of you didn't know. Unions are last organized progressive movements left in the country.

To whomever did this come by tuesday morning and do it in public, don't worry I won't call the cops.
by UnionMaid
How is it that bradley at riseup was there to take pictures of this crime against workers? Does he record this stuff in the name of "solidarity"? Is he part of the group that sprayed SEIU or was he just along for the ride?

He's the same photographer for many worker and student actions on the UCSC campus. So we somehow know him, right?

Maybe Bradley can put us in touch with the folks who did this and they can explain to us how they thought they were justified in destroying union workers' property......

Is it just a coincidence that a photographer was at SEIU, in a private alley that doesn't show to the public, just happened to be there at the same time as the grafitti vandals?

Does Bradley have the courage to post a comment helping me understand his place in all this?
by danielsan
bradley is a contributor who publishes his fotos, video, audio, and writing frequently. My understanding is that if there's news posted on the newswire, for example as this anonymous post was published on a Saturday at 11:30 am, anyone is welcome to follow up, or maybe even photograph what was written about, then post the fotos to the web, in this case for example more than ten hours later. Lots of people might have visited the Union hall that Saturday, and anyone who keeps a close eye on this site can easily notice a press release and act like the press to post pictures of the action.
by Solidarity
If Bradley doesn't condone attacks on the working class, perhaps he can use his photos for an appeal to help raise money amongst other working class groups (i.e. IWW, Labor Councils, etc.) to paint over the immature, anti-working class graffiti. We can all help our sisters and brother in Santa Cruz with solidarity and mutual aid: An Injury to One is an Injury to All!

I agree with the above post that it had to be the work of bosses or cops. Whoever did it had zero working class consciousness!
by david
witnessing the aftermath of a car accident does not make one responsible.

witnessing the aftermath of political graffiti does not make one responsible.
by VL
Bradley does use his photos *regularly* (and has for many years) to advance the various causes of the underclasses, including worker's struggles. He is a photojournalist. I understand you are upset at the responsible parties for this anonymous "wildcat action" against the union hall, but please do not go blindly lashing out at someone who has a long standing public record in this community of being FOR worker's struggles.
by VL
For the record, I've seen Bradley's photos reprinted in various labor publications, so BTFO...
by Javs
I was very disappointed to see such ultra-left vandalism on SEIU property. Not because im against the politics of message. I worked with SWCJ in the 2005 strike. I also believe that the union leadership will betray the interested of the rank-file. But anyone who really tries to build a rank-file movement will see first hand how difficult it is in this historical time period. Those who want to express such rank-file anti-bueacrat politics in that way does incredible harm for those who are actually trying to organize in the labor movement with those politics. What would Lucy Parsons, Big Bill Haywood, and John St Vincent do in such a situation?

Javs
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$200.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network