From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
America Awakens to Redevelopment Nightmare
On June 23, millions of middle-class Americans learned from the Supreme Court what the nation's poor have long known : Redevelopment Agencies have virtually total power over property within their jurisdiction. The ruling upholding New London, Conn's right to demolish people's homes to enrich private developers has led progressives like Congressmembers Maxine Waters and John Conyers to join conservatives in demanding that Redevelopment's power be curtailed. But as any former property owner victimized by Redevelopment in the Fillmore or South of Market might ask, "what took America so long to wake up"? Redevelopment has been taking people's property for decades, and its power in San Francisco will continue to grow unless our Board of Supervisors, or more likely the voters, puts a stop to it.
For all the furor, outrage and demands for Congressional action stemming from the Supreme Court ruling, many may be surprised to learn a critical fact: the Court simply affirmed fifty years of Redevelopment Agency practice. From St. Louis to Pittsburgh, from Detroit to our own liberal bastion of San Francisco, and in hundreds of other cities across America, Redevelopment Agencies have taken homes, demolished businesses, and wrecked lives, all in the name of "progress" and urban renewal.
Departing Justice Sandra Day O'Connor perfectly captured the national outrage over Redevelopment Agencies when she stated in her dissent, "All private property is now vulnerable to being taken and transferred to another private owner, so long as it might be upgraded." Maxine Waters and other progressives have pointed out that wealthy developers dominate the Redevelopment process through their campaign contributions to elected officials, so that even the "public uses" for which Redevelopment has used eminent domain has frequently been designed to benefit private interests.
Many current San Franciscans seem entirely unaware that the city's Redevelopment Agency demolished businesses and homes throughout the entire Fillmore District solely for the benefit of private developers. The Agency's destruction of 5000 SRO units in the South of Market had some public purpose-Moscone Center and Yerba Buena Gardens-but the mass "slum clearance" project also brought hefty profits to developers building upscale condos in the area.
Read More
Departing Justice Sandra Day O'Connor perfectly captured the national outrage over Redevelopment Agencies when she stated in her dissent, "All private property is now vulnerable to being taken and transferred to another private owner, so long as it might be upgraded." Maxine Waters and other progressives have pointed out that wealthy developers dominate the Redevelopment process through their campaign contributions to elected officials, so that even the "public uses" for which Redevelopment has used eminent domain has frequently been designed to benefit private interests.
Many current San Franciscans seem entirely unaware that the city's Redevelopment Agency demolished businesses and homes throughout the entire Fillmore District solely for the benefit of private developers. The Agency's destruction of 5000 SRO units in the South of Market had some public purpose-Moscone Center and Yerba Buena Gardens-but the mass "slum clearance" project also brought hefty profits to developers building upscale condos in the area.
Read More
For more information:
http://www.beyondchron.org/default.asp?sou...
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network