Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
In defense of Ariel Sharon
1. I am Ariel Sharon.
I, Ariel Sharon am a mass murderer of the goyim and a child of my Lord and Creator, Satan Himself. This being the case, we have been endowed with certain powers and abilities far superior to those of the inferior "goyim." (This terminology is explored later in this document.) Our Satanic heritage gives rise to physical and religious characteristics unique to our race.
I, Ariel Sharon am a mass murderer of the goyim and a child of my Lord and Creator, Satan Himself. This being the case, we have been endowed with certain powers and abilities far superior to those of the inferior "goyim." (This terminology is explored later in this document.) Our Satanic heritage gives rise to physical and religious characteristics unique to our race.
For example, all Jews are born with vestigial horns. (These can be seen in any non-retouched Jewish X-Ray.) In female children, the horns never break the scalp and therefore require little attention. However, in male children the horns break through within several days.
The primary purpose of the "briss" ceremony (performed on newborn Jewish males) is to remove these horns and "normalize" the scalp. (The circumcision is a secondary objective and serves to draw attention away from the true purpose of the ceremony.) Bereft of visible horns, many Jews pass amongst ary*ns without ever being noticed. (Since they are removed so early in life, there is virtually no visible scarring. However, if one looks closely at some balding Jewish men, one can faintly make out the markings.)
Another important ceremony in the life of the Jew is the "Bar Mitzvah." Seen by the goyim as a harmless, quaint coming-of-age ceremony, the true purpose of this ancient ritual is to induct young Jewish males into the Conspiracy and give them their initial assignments in the IJC hierarchy. (In more recent times a similar ritual has been devised for females. Today they take a much more active role in the Conspiracy than in the past.)
Jewish religious ceremonies frequently involve blood rituals and sacrifice of animals, including selected "goyim." This is particularly popular during the annual Passover and Purim Blood Festivals. (In truth, sacrifice of "goyim" is a practice that is performed less frequently today than in years past. It is primarily "old-timers," such as the author of this FAQ, that continue this grand tradition. A resurgence in the popularity of this traditional form of celebration is expected as IJC final goals come to fruition.)
2. How are Jews different from ordinary folks?
Although there are certainly individual variations, Jews are in general far superior in every way to their Goyim counterparts. Jews are more intelligent and enjoy a much higher level of cultural and moral character than mere "goyim." Another area in which Jews excel is in planning and implementing long-term projects, which literally span centuries. It is this ability (conspicuously absent in Goyim), which is at the heart of the Conspiracy's continued success and ultimate victory.
Noble in character, steel-willed in nature, and successful in the extreme, the Jew rises far above the gutter "religions" and "cultures" of the filthy Goyim races. In fact, Jews are the highest expression of life to be found on the face of the Earth. Goyim are little more than insects in comparison to the nearly God-like characteristics of their Jewish masters.
WHAT IS THE TALMUD?
1. The Talmud: the most Holy of Holies.
The sacred Talmud scrolls are the holiest works known to the Jewish race. A gift from our Lord and Creator, Satan Himself, these hallowed texts are the highest Jewish law, and direct all aspects of Jewish life and our relations with the inferior "goyim." (Everyone that’s not a Jew)
2. What the Talmud tells us: a blueprint.
The sacred Talmud scrolls speak to us of many things. Cheating the goyim. Enslavement and destruction of the filthy Goyim races. Establishing control of major financial, cultural, and political institutions.
It is no exaggeration to state that the sacred Talmud scrolls are the underlying basis for the Jew. It clearly lays out the goals and methods towards which our entire racial energies are directed.
No "goy" has ever seen the Talmud in its entirety. The most revered and important sections are reserved for Jewish eyes only.
3. The Talmud and the Goyim.
The Talmud specifically tells us of the races we are to subjugate, enslave, and in the end utterly obliterate. The races identified in this most holy text as the Goy Today we know this enemy as the foul and filthy Goyim.
4. Just who or what are these "goyim" I keep hearing about?
The sacred Talmud scrolls identify "goyim." This is a Jewish word, which literally translated means "cattle or non-human." It is used as a handy shortcut when referring to Goyim in a manner describing the salient characteristics of other races. ("Goyim" is plural, as in referring to a herd of cattle or non-humans. A single animal is referred to as a "goy.")
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$210.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
How can you portray him in this light? I'm going to cry you have committed the ultimate crime! And I hope our brave F-16 pilots bomb the hell out of you and your kids that hang around our settlements on our territorial land that god gave us Jews
But if you're an example of gentiles, you almost make them sound like a good idea.
Fortunately, most non-Jews are not nearly so ignorant or hateful.
The Nazis also performed war crimes on are own solders at Malmady during the battle of the bulge.
Why can't someone be a Stalin or a Tito? Why Hitler?
Im so sick of Nazis.Yeah, they wore cool looking uniforms had had cool tanks and stuff.They had cool accents and wore monocles and did sick shit.
But so did the Japanise.They did really nasty stuff but do lefties call righties "Japs"?noooooo
It's Nazis,Nazis,Nazis!Nazis in my soup,Nazis in my hair,Nazis Nazis everywhere.
I don't know what colouring book you got that out of - but actually American conservatives at that time did not in the least want to go to war with Hitler. I guess you didn't know that Roosevelt was a Democrat. Republicans called him a 'warmonger' and espoused a political platform known as 'isolationism'
Here is a good article on the Old Right:
"MERE "ISOLATIONISM": THE FOREIGN POLICY OF THE OLD RIGHT
One of the "old causes" embraced in this column – perhaps the most important one – is that of the "isolationist" Old Right. As used by the late Murray Rothbard among others, the term Old Right refers to a loose coalition opposed to the New Deal in both its domestic and foreign aspects. While not following a strict "party line," Old Rightists largely spoke from the ground of classical liberalism and classical republicanism. This earned them epithets like "conservative" and "reactionary" since those two outlooks were rooted in actual American life. Having something to conserve made them "conservatives" – a terrible thing from the standpoint of the Party of Progress. This was a label which many on the Old Right rejected, arguing with a certain dogged futility that they were the real American "liberals." (See Justin Raimondo's Reclaiming the American Right for more on this movement.)
The Old Right was effectively dead by 1955 with the death, electoral defeat, or retirement of many of its prominent figures. More importantly, the Right was undergoing an ideological make-over as new spokesmen (hereafter called the New Right) rushed headlong into interventionism and overseas empire under Cold War slogans and policies largely invented by Establishment Liberals. In an interesting case of cultural lag, the American press continued to refer to the "conservatives" or whatever as "isolationists" well into the later 1950s. They didn't fully take on board the transformation of the Right until 1964, when they had to denounce Barry Goldwater as an inhumane, trigger-happy fellow, who wanted to immolate poor flower-picking little girls in nuclear Armageddon, unlike Ole LBJ, who would never, never get us into a wider war anywhere. But at least they finally noticed the existence of the New Right. As Carl Oglesby pointed out (speaking of Vietnam), the Goldwaterite New Right "accepts the political description [of the war] and therefore wants the war to be more fiercely waged" – a point which applies to the entire Cold War. For the Goldwaterites far more active policies were necessary to "win" that great cosmic struggle than those undertaken by the inept Liberals.
The problem was in the premises, and this brings me back to the Old Right's distinctive take on foreign policies. It was hard to stampede the Old Right into futile crusades involving Total Good vs. Total Evil. As critics of our intervention in World War I, they were aware of the costs of grand ideological crusades and of war itself. This – rather than some unexplained fondness for foreign governments known for big parades and funny salutes – accounts for their participation in the America First movement. (Actually, the Liberals "explained" it on the view that everyone to their Right has bad motives – fascists! Nazis! – whereas those to their Left are basically good but in too much of a hurry, but I think we can reject this construct.) For some Old Rightists the aversion to intervention and "futile crusades" continued into the early Cold War period."
http://www.antiwar.com/stromberg/s081099.html
So you see, your assertion that conservatives supported the war was just something you guessed at, and you were wrong. You should never believe what you hope is true.