Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
E.R., Eucalyptus Roulette and Public Safety
by Robert Sward (sward [at]
Sunday May 5th, 2002 3:25 PM
E.R., Eucalyptus Roulette and Public Safety
E.R. {Eucalyptus Roulette}
A Foreseeable Danger in Santa Cruz / Monterey County

In view of the foreseeable danger from the flammable, shallow rooted eucalyptus tree, it may be
time for Santa Cruz to revise the existing Ordinance so it reflects the reality of conditions in
Northern California.

On March 5, 1996 my wife was nearly killed by a falling 160 foot tall eucalyptus tree. A few years
earlier, the Berkeley/Oakland Hills fire killed over 20 people and caused more than $5 billion
damage. Fire officials say the blue gum eucalyptus was a key cause of that blaze and also the fire
storm that recently struck Australia. Then there’s a San Francisco Chronicle article (Oct. 23, 1991),
which pointed out, “Firefighters hate Eucalyptus. Their bark and leaves create kindling like litter.
With the smell of smoke still in the air, the city manager got orders to clear out any that already
grow on Berkeley public land.”

Back home, Santa Cruz Fire Marshall Mark Latham says, “blue gum eucalyptus are both a fire
hazard and an aggressive plant that overwhelms and displaces native vegetation.”

Having lived in the area since 1985, this issue has become increasingly alarming. I began doing
some of my own research. Here are some facts I discovered:

Ornithologist Karen Ritchie writes, "Eucalyptus may be held accountable for killing songbirds.
Insectivores are attracted to insects feeding on its gummy flowers, only to have their nares blocked
by the resins, eventually causing their demise. A hard cost for today's plummeting neotropical
migrant populations."

Past President of UCSC Arboretum, Lorna Clark points out, "The present heritage tree description
protects the trees which grow the fastest, achieve trunk size the fastest and are by definition the
weediest and least desirable for the California landscape."

The "Encyclopedia of Australian Plants suitable for cultivation" reports: "Although eucs have
proved beneficial… problems have arisen. One is the capacity of some species to dry the soil because
of their gigantic demands for water, and another is that certain species have become a tree-weed
problem, e.g., in California."

"The riparian corridor argument is faulty because riparian corridors are supposed to contain trees
and plants indigenous to California, and the euc eliminates them. No riparian corridor should
contain a eucalyptus tree… They choke out the indigenous [truly] heritage trees and foliage and
become the dominant species." --Debra Dixon, Aug. 16, 2000.

“When the Boy Scouts started cluster-bombing Marin County with [eucalyptus seedlings], Ansel
Adams helped run them out, declaring ‘I cannot think of a more tasteless undertaking than to
plant trees in a naturally treeless area, and to impose an interpretation of natural beauty on a great
landscape that is charged with beauty and wonder, and the excellence of eternity.” –Audubon
Magazine, Jan. 2002.

Educating the public will make it less of a political liability for Santa Cruz officials who understand
the danger of polarizing well intentioned individuals against homeowners who simply want to
protect their homes and ensure the lives of family members. Because it costs as much as $3000. to
remove one 160 foot tree, homeowners are unlikely to take on any more expense than is necessary
to preserve their lives. Acknowledge this fact and make it easier for both sides to proceed in good

The word “Heritage” is misleading and unfairly loads the argument against homeowners
endangered by hazardous trees. In any case, there is a foreseeable danger. If city officials deny a
property owner's request to remove trees situated on private property, why shouldn’t the City
assume financial and legal liability for resulting damage to life or property?

If the Ordinance is allowed to stand as is, homeowners and their families may literally be burned
alive as a "crown fire" causes eucalyptus trees to explode, say fire officials. Temperatures can reach
the point where homes disintegrate and the ground beneath them turns to a ceramic like substance.
Perhaps the Ordinance could be renamed Hazardous Tree Ordinance or, The Reality Tree
Robert Sward is a retired Cabrillo College English instructor and has taught for UCSC Ext. since



E.R., Eucalyptus Roulette

Eucalyptus / Public Safety

Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!


Donate Now!

$ 85.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.


Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network