From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Sac journalist forced to delete pics of LAX
Homeland Insecurity
A Sacramento journalist is taken into custody by police and forced to destroy photos by an over-zealous National Guardsman. Apparently, the terrorists are indeed causing instability.
A Sacramento journalist is taken into custody by police and forced to destroy photos by an over-zealous National Guardsman. Apparently, the terrorists are indeed causing instability.
Does this man frighten you? The "suspicious" journalist shows his ticket and ID at Sacramento International Airport. The photos of LAX were ordered destroyed.
<See link for full article>
<See link for full article>
For more information:
http://www.newsreview.com/issues/sacto/200...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
This is to stop people from taking photos and analyzing the security configuration.
He asked the Natl Guard spokesman later, as well as an FAA spokesman and they both agreed that the NG and LAPD had no right to demand his notebook nor his photos.
WE own the airports. WE own the streets. WE own the police. WE own the courts. Where's all that money come from, a motherfucking bake sale?
Airports are a public place, built with public money. Natl Guard wear uniforms, carry weapons, and drive in armored vehicles WE PAID FOR. LAPD - the same! WE are supposed to be the MASTERS, not the SLAVES.
Today it's the airports - tomorrow it'll be the banks, then the grocery stores, then the streets themselves. If the govt has nothing to hide (a massive military buildup, rude and totally out of line soldiers, unacceptable restrictions on the right to travel a private airline) behind the new "security checkpoints", then why are they so eager to keep it out of sight of as many people as possible?
Some heavily-armed asshole in fucking camo barking orders at a professional journalist to delete pictures of a public place and of G.I. Joe there.. maybe you're too young to remember East Germany (or have you just dropped it in Orwell's Memory Hole?), but this shit is straight out of the Reagan-era USSR and people need to see that!
There can be no Democracy without an informed citizenry. Only totalitarian dictators fear the free flow of information. If you don't believe me, look at China.
Matter of fact... if YOU love "security" so much, why dont YOU move to motherfucking China you tyrant piece of shit, and quit advocating the destruction of American freedom?
Lastly, I agree w/ Nessie - you clueless zombie fuck, we weren't attacked by a foreign government! We were attacked by 4-10 hijackers who died in the process, who may or may not have been helped by Osama and a few of his cohorts. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT. But people like you suck down the West Wing's propaganda like a crack whore earning $20.
Your ignorance is a greater threat to this country than any bunch of suicidal hijackers. They only harmed 5,000. Thick-headed pack animals like you will harm millions.
The end has begun.
A new organization is put into place. Some Guardsman - who was probably in a classroom or factory or donut shop the day before - acted wrongly and the ad-hoc-just-put-together organization didn't know what to do and acted indecisive, erring on the side of excess caution.
The 'higher ups' admitted the error later and were probably right for not punishing the kid. Only real damage this time was to journalist ego.
Let's not get sidetracked by this trivial stuff. We should focus on the real issues such as 'material witness' holdings.
Normally these creeps are hidden from public sight, but now they're easily sniffed out. Just start photographing Guardsmen until you find one who goes ballistic over it. Then just as the NG spokesman indicated.. gee, it might get awfully DANGEROUS for Johnny Bravo there if those photos to be PUBLISHED. Next time he's working undercover, one of his victims might recognize Johnny and bring a quick end to his cannabis-club-busting career.
Wouldn't that be a pity.
> government of afghanistan to express a view of
> disagreement of US policy, killed 6000 americans in a
> attack against US citizens.
When it's American civilians dying, it's "terrorism". When it's Iraqi, Serbian, Bosnian, Chilean, Nacaraguan, Iranian, Palestinian, or Afghani civilians then it's "disagreement with US foreign policy".
Eyes wide shut, as usual.
In controlled locations around the earth, religion may one day grow a flower for its history of thorns. Religion is cancer and obsession with death and destruction of liberty and personal autonomy. Once you stop howling at the moon and the sun shines over a planet with no inbred terrorist dogs. You arent gonna like me very much, Till then, Peace Brother. ( I use Brother assuming you are American of any color or any religion )
> government of afghanistan to express a view of
> disagreement of US policy, killed 6000 americans in a
> attack against US citizens.
incorrect. the group of terrorists were trained by the USA to express a view of disagreement of Soviet occupation. They then saw the USA's occupation of Saudi Arabia as being in the same vein as the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. 6000 people were not killed either. Where do you get your facts from? I was going to assume the daily news(TM) but since you claim 6000 deaths you must just be making stuff up on the fly. Its all good though, if you keep doing that you're bound to get educated sooner or later.
Search me scan me print me picture me probe me shake me feel me I'm American. New deal. Or same smell different nostril as my friends and I say and laugh strolling the back forty acres smoking the sweet new buds of late fall.
Peace All