Add comment on:

Victory for Civilian Oversight of Citizen Complaints Against Oakland Police 4/28/09: audio
dave id
A big victory was won tonight for those in favor of civilian police review in Oakland. After last minute police resistance, the City Council Public Safety Committee agreed that it would be in the best interest of Oakland to have civilians rather than the Oakland Police Internal Affairs Department overseeing all citizen complaints against the OPD. Despite the fact that the Oakland police department had previously worked with the Mayor's Task Force on Police Issues in coming up with the recommendation to move all citizen complaints from Internal Affairs to the Citizens' Police Review Board, Oakland police decided to largely oppose the proposal at tonight's hearing. For some unknown reason, Oakland police were scheduled to speak in opposition to the proposal at the Public Safety hearing before the actual proposal was presented. After Oakland police and Task Force members spoke -- and after nearly an hour of public comment in favor of fully "civilianizing" citizen complaints -- the Oakland City Council Public Safety Committee more or less moved past police objections and issued a directive for all participants from the Task Force, including police, to return to the next committee hearing on May 12th with a specific consensus agreement on how to proceed with implementing the proposal to hire at least ten new investigators for the Citizens' Police Review Board as they assume responsibility for intake and investigation of all citizen complaints against OPD. Assuming Oakland police cooperate with the directive, the new consensus should move from the committee to the full Oakland City Council as early as next month. Implementation of the plan would represent a dramatic step forward for increasing police accountability and transparency in Oakland. The audio here includes only the part of the hearing dealing with the proposal for the Citizen's Police Review Board. Other items on the committee hearing agenda were discussed before and after the civilian oversight proposal.

Guidelines for commenting on news articles:

Thanks for contributing to Indybay's open publishing newswire. You may use any format for your response article, from traditional academic discourse to subjective personal account. Please keep it on topic and concise. And please read our editorial policy, privacy, and legal statements before continuing. Or go back to the article.

Comment Title (required)
Author (required)
TEXT/HTML (required)
Tip: use spaces between paragraphs.

For plain text, URLs will be converted to clickable links. You may also use <a href="url">link</a> in plain text articles (other tags will be ignored unless you select "HTML"). When selecting "HTML", you must provide <p></p> and <br /> tags for paragraphs and line breaks.

Number Of Uploads
Maximum size of each uploaded file 480MB; maximum total size of all uploaded files 560MB; 6 hours maximum uploading time.
Accepted File Types: 3G2, 3GP, AMR, AVI, F4V, FLV, GIF, JPG, M3U, M4A, M4V, MOV, MP3, MP4, MPG, OGA, OGG, OGV, PDF, PLS, PNG, RAM, RM, TORRENT, WAV, WMA, WMV
For playability of media files on mobile devices, upload videos as MP4s with H.264 encoding. For audio, upload MP3s.
Anti-spam questions (Required) What is 9 plus 2?

You must preview your post before publishing.