Add Comment on:
After Adverse Publicity, Wal-Mart Drops $400,000 Health Care Claim Against Former Employee Disabled in Traffic Accident
Wednesday, April 2, 2008 :After tremendous adverse publicity, retail giant Wal-Mart has announced it is dropping its effort to collect over $400,000 dollars in health care reimbursement from Debbie Shank, a former employee. Debbie lost much of her memory and ability to communicate or walk in a car crash in May 2000. Her family successfully sued the trucking company involved and after attorneys' fees and expenses, the $417,000 dollars from the settlement was put in a trust for Debbie's care. That's when Wal-Mart stepped in and sued the Shanks to recover the medical costs. Wal-Mart won the case in court. The story generated a public outcry after it was recently featured on several national news networks and newspaper editorials. We speak with Debbie's husband, Jim Shank.
Wednesday, April 2, 2008 :After tremendous adverse publicity, retail giant Wal-Mart has announced it is dropping its effort to collect over $400,000 dollars in health care reimbursement from Debbie Shank, a former employee. Debbie lost much of her memory and ability to communicate or walk in a car crash in May 2000. Her family successfully sued the trucking company involved and after attorneys' fees and expenses, the $417,000 dollars from the settlement was put in a trust for Debbie's care. That's when Wal-Mart stepped in and sued the Shanks to recover the medical costs. Wal-Mart won the case in court. The story generated a public outcry after it was recently featured on several national news networks and newspaper editorials. We speak with Debbie's husband, Jim Shank.
×
Previews not available for media files.
Short description of the image used by screen readers.
Guidelines for commenting on news articles:
Thanks for contributing to Indybay's open publishing newswire. You may use any format for your response, from traditional academic discourse to subjective personal account. Please, keep it on topic and concise. Read our editorial policy, privacy, and legal statements before continuing. Or go back to the article.