Add Comment on:
Should San Francisco Extend Supervisors’ Term Limits?
A proposed November ballot initiative is being floated that would enable San Francisco Supervisors to serve three terms, rather than two. Los Angeles voters recently extended term limits for City Council members, and the State Legislature is finalizing a term limits reform for the February 2008 state ballot. Conservatives have promoted term limits, and some progressives view limits as an important strategy for reinvigorating democracy. Would giving San Francisco Supervisors the right to serve a third term benefit local government, and, if so, would progressives gain from the proposal?
A proposed November ballot initiative is being floated that would enable San Francisco Supervisors to serve three terms, rather than two. Los Angeles voters recently extended term limits for City Council members, and the State Legislature is finalizing a term limits reform for the February 2008 state ballot. Conservatives have promoted term limits, and some progressives view limits as an important strategy for reinvigorating democracy. Would giving San Francisco Supervisors the right to serve a third term benefit local government, and, if so, would progressives gain from the proposal?
×
Previews not available for media files.
Short description of the image used by screen readers.
Guidelines for commenting on news articles:
Thanks for contributing to Indybay's open publishing newswire. You may use any format for your response, from traditional academic discourse to subjective personal account. Please, keep it on topic and concise. Read our editorial policy, privacy, and legal statements before continuing. Or go back to the article.