Publish to Newswire
Add an EventAdd Comment on:
Chronicle Seeks to Undermine Minimum Wage Study
The San Francisco Chronicle opposed the November 2003 initiative that created an $8.50 per hour city minimum wage, believing that the $6.75 state minimum was sufficient. Now that a new study has shown that none of the predicted negatives associated with the wage hike has occurred, the Chronicle’s January 4 article on the report continues the paper’s anti-wage hike crusade. Forget the fact that the current $8.82 per hour remains far below what city contractors must pay, or that the state minimum has not kept up with inflation. With its Season of Sharing charity program over for the year, the paper can get back to putting the needs of the Committee of Jobs ahead of San Francisco’s low-wage workers.
The San Francisco Chronicle opposed the November 2003 initiative that created an $8.50 per hour city minimum wage, believing that the $6.75 state minimum was sufficient. Now that a new study has shown that none of the predicted negatives associated with the wage hike has occurred, the Chronicle’s January 4 article on the report continues the paper’s anti-wage hike crusade. Forget the fact that the current $8.82 per hour remains far below what city contractors must pay, or that the state minimum has not kept up with inflation. With its Season of Sharing charity program over for the year, the paper can get back to putting the needs of the Committee of Jobs ahead of San Francisco’s low-wage workers.
×
Previews not available for media files.
Short description of the image used by screen readers.
Guidelines for commenting on news articles:
Thanks for contributing to Indybay's open publishing newswire. You may use any format for your response, from traditional academic discourse to subjective personal account. Please, keep it on topic and concise. Read our editorial policy, privacy, and legal statements before continuing. Or go back to the article.