BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org
PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:Indybay-65403
SEQUENCE:65403
CREATED:20050506T035200Z
DESCRIPTION:Please forward...  Please help us turn out in big numbers for next 
 Tuesday's City Council Public Safety Committee meeting (May 10th). We will 
 be arriving at 6:30PM to make sure our message and speaker cards are 
 straight for the meeting that begins at 7:30PM.  Please come early and 
 bring friends!!  Also, please make the following e-mails and calls in 
 support of the following 6 points.    Ignacio de la Fuente  (510) 238-7005  
  510-238-6910  FAX  Email: idelafuente@oaklandnet.com  Larry Reid   (510) 
 238-7007   (510) 238-6910 FAX  E-mail: lreid@oaklandnet.com  Nancy J. Nadel 
   (510) 238-7303     FAX: (510)  238-6129  E-mail: nnadel@oaklandnet.com  
 Jean Quan     510/238-7004   Fax: 510/238-6129  Email: jquan@oaklandnet.com 
      COMMUNITY MEMORANDUM  FROM: Measure Y Coalition  TO: Oakland City 
 Council Public Safety Committee  DATE: May 10, 2005  RE: Response to 
 Measure Y: Status Report and Request for Action Violence Prevention and 
 Public Safety Act of 2004 & Council Public Safety Committee Meeting of 
 April 12, 2005  General Considerations:  The Measure Y Coalition would like 
 to thank City staff and the Council Public Safety Committee for serious 
 consideration of the critique and the issues that the Coalition has 
 presented in regards to the implementation of Measure Y and crime 
 prevention in Oakland in general. It is our intention to be constructive 
 and supportive of successful, efficient outcomes that prevent crime, 
 empower individuals and build community.  The Coalition would like to 
 recognize and praise the Committee for what we understand to be the 
 expressed position of a majority of the Members in favor of a maximum use 
 of a RFP process in choosing the service programs to be funded by Measure Y 
 funds. We believe that this will set a necessary precedent for the use of 
 the funds that will militate against the actuality or the perception that 
 the Council’s “favorite” programs will be chosen as opposed to the 
 best programs needed to prevent crime.  In this second meeting of the 
 Public Safety Committee, the Measure Y Coalition would like to emphasize 
 the following revised six points in the spirit of constructive critique:  
 Six Points of Emphasis:  1.) Maintain the sheltered parolee City sponsored 
 employment program. At the April 12 meeting, staff presented two options 
 for a sheltered employment program.   “Staff recommendations also include 
 two (2) sheltered employment options in which the City would provide 
 subsidized employment and training support modeled after an East Bay MUD 
 project. Sheltered employment options may face serious implementation 
 hurdles such as union concerns. The sheltered employment recommendation has 
 two implementation options. One to create a program working closely with 
 Public Works and the second is to create a program that places workers 
 throughout the City in a variety of “trainee” positions. If Council 
 does not recommend this option, staff proposes the funds be added to the 
 Mayor’s Summer Jobs Program which would support an additional 200 youth 
 (beyond the current proposal of 115) for the summer.”  Council member 
 Ignacio de la Fuentes passed out a written amendment to the staff report 
 that recommended that the City not do the sheltered employment program and 
 that the funds be spent on a recreation program. He said that the private 
 sector should hire parolees. His stated reasoning was that there is an 
 insurance problem for the City.  The Coalition’s question is how are 
 parolees going to be hired, despite all the training and resume writing 
 assistance that they might receive through Measure Y funds, if even the 
 City is not willing to “step up to the plate.” The City needs to set 
 the example for the private sector by hiring these 16 folks. We believe 
 that this sheltered employment program is small and inadequate but an 
 important step for crime prevention.  There is a Federal Bonding Program 
 that bonds all jobs in the public and private sectors, full and part-time 
 positions, as well as jobs secured through temporary agencies. The bond 
 insurance is free to the employer for the first six months. It goes into 
 effect the first day of the job applicant’s employment. After the six 
 months, continued coverage can be purchased under the program’s bond. 
 Coverage is provided for any at-risk job applicant whose background usually 
 leads employers to question their honesty and deny them a job. This 
 includes people with criminal records, people in treatment or recovery for 
 alcohol and/or other drug addictions, and people with little or no work 
 history. There is no insurance problem.  Neither is there a union problem. 
 The staff recommendation is for “trainee” or intern jobs. The program 
 will not be replacing union jobs or work being done by union workers. If 
 the parolees were eventually hired in regular jobs, they would be come 
 members of the union.    2.) There should be more money allocated to a 
 thorough and ongoing evaluation of the Community Policing program. The 
 Coalition still believes that it is unacceptable that neither performance 
 outcomes nor evaluation measures for assigned OPD community policing 
 officers or other officers funded by Measure Y are available or part of the 
 implementation report. These evaluation instruments should already exist! 
 It is unacceptable to require that social service programs be data driven 
 and not require that police programs also be data driven.  3.) There should 
 be full integration and collaboration of violence prevention efforts by 
 community agencies and the Police Department.  There is no hope for 
 successful violence prevention if money is being split between various 
 community and city agencies with no coordination with the Police 
 Department.  Community policing officers need to be trained by and with the 
 community agencies on what those agencies will be doing. The referral 
 system must be more than a list of telephone numbers and addresses for the 
 police officers; the officers must know the community programs well enough 
 to use them as an alternative to punishing youth in trouble.  4.) There 
 should be comprehensive Re-entry Centers for formerly incarcerated people. 
 Comprehensive means wraparound services that include COMPENSATION, Housing 
 assistance, Educational Training, Vocational Training, Legal services, and 
 Health Services.  The current city proposal is woefully inadequate in 
 addressing the needs of the formerly incarcerated.  We insist on the 
 creation of a permanent space dedicated to comprehensive wraparound 
 services that give parolees a real chance at starting over.  5.) There 
 should be a comprehensive Teen Centers for high school aged youth. 
 Comprehensive means Jobs, Counseling, Training Programs, Positive Social 
 Activities, Youth Input into Decisions and Design. Prevention does not end 
 in middle school.  The current proposal focuses on prevention programs for 
 middle school and intervention programs once youth enter the system.   
 There is a huge gap in services and resources for youth in high school.   
 National models for outreach and counseling in Boston and New York 
 demonstrate the importance of prevention in the teen years.  Measure Y 
 money should be directed to transforming four (4) Park and Recreation 
 Facilities into Teen Centers. One of these centers should have a 
 African-American cultural focus.  6.) We insist that the City Council keep 
 its statutory promise to “increase and expand” services by using 
 Measure Y money for new services not to fill up holes in the General Fund 
 Budget or any other budget.  At the Special City Council Meeting of May 10, 
 2004, it was reported that approximately $7,298,872 of annual funds from 
 other than City sources (including OFCY) was allocated to violence 
 prevention. In addition, $2,590,981 of City General Funds was used for 
 violence prevention.  These levels must be maintained and expanded.  It 
 will be a violation of the statute for the City to use Measure Y funds to 
 replace money cut or loss from other budgets. Measure Y money is intended 
 to increase levels of service.  Thank you for your continued serious 
 consideration of these matters.  \n 
 https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2005/05/05/65403.php
SUMMARY:Measure Y Mobilization
LOCATION:City Hall, 14th and Broadway
URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2005/05/05/65403.php
DTSTART:20050511T013000Z
DTEND:20050511T043000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
