BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org
PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:Indybay-56553
SEQUENCE:56553
CREATED:20050128T220400Z
DESCRIPTION:Iraqi Elections = Death for Iraqis & US Troops = Oil for US Corporations  
 Troops Home Now!  End the Occupation and Empire!  Sunday January 30  4pm: 
 Demonstration and Vigil  5pm: Procession  Market and Van Ness, SF  Join us 
 in publicly opposing the sham elections in Iraq.  The Bush  Administration 
 is using these elections in an attempt to legitimize  the  continued US 
 occupation.   People can not vote in Iraq without  fear of  death. 
 Democratic participation and self-determination have  been denied.  This is 
 not Democracy, it is Death.  The Elections Must be Opposed.  The elections 
 will mean more blood spilled for Oil.   On December 22,  2004 the Iraqi 
 Finance Minister announced at the National Press Club  in  Washington, D.C. 
 that Iraq wants to issue a new oil law that would  open  Iraq's national 
 oil company to private foreign investment.  The  catch?  The Finance 
 Minister's Shiite political party will first have  to gain the  majority in 
 the new government.  Thus, the elections go  forward, the  Shiites get 
 power and the Bush Administration and its  Corporate War  Profiteers get 
 Iraq's oil.  We are a group of friends active in anti-war, direct action 
 and  global justice movements who felt called to initiate a public  
 demonstration to express our outrage, grief and resistance. We will  mourn  
 the victims of the war, occupation and policies of empire.  We  will read  
 aloud the testimonies and stories of Iraqis living under  the occupation.  
 Their voices will not be heard in these elections.  Let us come together  
 in the streets, to listen, to give voice, to  call for an end to the  
 bloodshed.  BACKGROUND:  Calling Sundays looming election in Iraq a "grand 
 moment" in history,  President Bush said at a press conference on 
 Wednesday--a day in  which more American troops died than any other day of 
 the war,  "The  fact  that they're voting, in itself, is successful."  
 Antonia Juhasz in an article published on Alternet on January 27 writes:  
 On Dec. 22, 2004, Iraqi Finance Minister Abdel Mahdi told a handful  of  
 reporters and industry insiders at the National Press Club in  Washington, 
 D.C. that Iraq wants to issue a new oil law that would  open  Iraq's 
 national oil company to private foreign investment. As  Mahdi  explained: 
 "So I think this is very promising to the American  investors  and to 
 American enterprise, certainly to oil companies."  In other words, Mahdi is 
 proposing to privatize Iraq's oil and put it  into American corporate 
 hands. While few in the American media other  than  Emad Mckay of Inter 
 Press Service reported on -- or even  attended -- Mahdiís press 
 conference, the announcement was made with  U.S.  Undersecretary of State 
 Alan Larson at Mahdi's side. It was  intended to send a message -- but to 
 whom?  It turns out that Abdel Mahdi is running in the Jan. 30 elections on 
  the  ticket of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution (SCIR),  the 
  leading Shiite political party. While announcing the selling-off  of the  
 resource which provides 95 percent of all Iraqi revenue may  not garner  
 Mahdi many Iraqi votes, but it will unquestionably win him  tremendous  
 support from the U.S. government and U.S. corporations.  Mahdi's SCIR is 
 far and away the front-runner in the upcoming  elections, particularly as 
 it becomes increasingly less possible for  Sunnis to vote because the 
 regions where they live are spiraling into  deadly chaos. If Bush were to 
 suggest to Iraqís Interim Prime  Minister Iyad Allawi that elections 
 should be called off, Mahdi and  the  SCIR's ultimate chances of victory 
 will likely decline.  Thus, one might argue that the Bush administration 
 has made a deal  with  the SCIR: Iraq's oil for guaranteed political power. 
 The  Americans are able to put forward such a bargain because Bush still  
 holds  the strings in Iraq.  Based on all reports from both U.S. military 
 and Iraqi officials, the  elections this Sunday could be a blood bath for 
 Iraqis and American  troops alike. They are also certain to be far from 
 representative.  Democratic elections simply cannot be held under these 
 conditions,  nor  conditions in which the U.S. government and its 
 corporations  exercise such dominant economic and political control.  Dahr 
 Jamail reported on January 26 from Iraq:  The high commission for elections 
 of Iraq has still not announced the  location of polling stations due to 
 security fears, but many school  buildings around Baghdad are being 
 cordoned off with sand barriers,  concrete blocks and razor wire.  "I feel 
 unsafe in my own home now, even more than before," said  Hashim al-Obeidy, 
 a retired engineer. A school building near his  house is being prepared as 
 a polling station. "I watched the American  soldiers building these 
 barriers. And now I am afraid mortars will  hit my  home if the school is 
 attacked."  Standing outside his house in central Baghdad, he pointed to a 
 row of  large sand barriers outside an old yellow school building with  
 damaged walls and cracked paint. "They already severely damaged our  school 
 system, they haven't rebuilt anything, and now they will  create more 
 destruction in the schools," he said. Many Iraqis  continue to express 
 frustration over what they see as illegitimate  elections.  Prof. Shawket 
 Daoud, a computer science specialist who now works for  the  government, 
 said uncertainty over polling booths and the fear of  violence  was not the 
 only problem. "Why vote when we don't even know  who is  running yet?"  
 More than 7,000 candidates on the electoral lists have opted to  remain 
 anonymous prior to polling day. At least eight political  leaders thought 
 to be candidates have been killed. Many others  receive death threats. Abu 
 Sabah, a grocery stall owner near the  Karrada district of Baghdad says he 
 is simply confused about the  election. The elections feel rushed and a 
 list of  at least 83 coalitions of political parties with mostly anonymous  
 candidates makes no sense, he says.  "Who says we should have elections for 
 people we don't even know  during occupation, martial law and in a war 
 zone," he said.  http://alternet.org/waroniraq/21102/\n 
 https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2005/01/28/56553.php
SUMMARY:Oppose Sham Elections in Iraq--Sunday 4pm, Market + Van Ness
LOCATION:
URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2005/01/28/56553.php
DTSTART:20050131T000000Z
DTEND:20050131T030000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
