BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN BEGIN:VEVENT UID:Indybay-18885315 SEQUENCE:19062287 CREATED:20260331T233300Z DESCRIPTION:Rally & Press Conference Hands Off My Voice & My Body-Workers & Labor Groups To Rally At SF Federal Building\n\nPress Conference & Rally\nMarch 31, 2026\nSan Francisco Federal Building\n450 Golden Gate\nSan Francisco\n\nContact:\nAshley Gjovik ashleymgjovik@protonmail.com\nLaborMedia | lvpsf@igc.org\n\nWORKERS, LABOR GROUPS TO RALLY AT SAN FRANCISCO FEDERAL COURTHOUSE\nOVER COURT-ORDERED GAG ON EMPLOYEE SPEECH ABOUT HER OWN BODY\nFederal judge ordered fired Apple worker to delete public speech about workplace conditions, NLRB charges, and employee grievances — and to stop talking about it going forward, potentially forever — based solely on a Big Tech employer's say-so, and with no hearing, no findings, no motion, and pending NLRB charges.\n\nSAN FRANCISCO — On Thursday, April 2, 2026, at 12:00 PM, workers, labor organizers, and whistleblower advocates will rally outside the Phillip Burton Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, to demand that federal courts stop allowing employers to silence workers who speak publicly about their own working conditions, their own bodies, and their own experiences on the job.\n\nThe rally is organized by Ashley Gjovik, a former Apple senior engineering program manager who was fired in 2021 after publicly reporting environmental hazards, invasive employee studies, and workplace surveillance — and who has now been ordered by a federal magistrate judge to delete her public speech and stop talking about Apple's unlawful conduct and unfair labor practices, based on Apple's unilateral claim that her own experiences, witness testimony, and complaints are Apple's "confidential business information."\n\nThe rally is held in partnership with Whistleblowers United (WBU), California Coalition for Workers Memorial Day, WorkWeek, and the United Front Committee for a Labor Party (UFCLP).\n\nWHAT HAPPENED\nOn March 30, 2026, a federal magistrate judge in the Northern District of California ordered Gjovik to "de-publish" speech about Apple's workplace practices and treat anything Apple designates as "Confidential" as off-limits — indefinitely, with no end date, and with no court ever determining whether the information is actually confidential. Apple's own motion had been denied for failure to follow court procedures. The court then gave Apple more than Apple asked for — as a freebie. The boss couldn't even be bothered to do the paperwork, and the court did the boss's job for it. No hearing was held. No evidence was reviewed. No findings were made.\n\nThe information Apple wants silenced: Gjovik's testimony and public statements about Apple asking female employees to track their menstrual cycles, measure their cervical mucus, and track intimate details of their reproductive and sexual health — all for product development research. Gjovik declined to participate and complained.\n\nGjovik also complained about other workplace studies and surveillance. Apple claims all of it is secret — and will now move to designate all of it as permanently confidential under the court's blanket order, which Apple is using as an NDA that protects only Apple's business interests. \n\nThe order does not protect privacy. It inverts it: the corporation that invaded its workers' privacy is now using a federal judge to stop the worker from telling anyone about it — while Apple is under investigation by multiple government agencies, including the NLRB and NIH, for the same conduct.\n\nApple has never designated a single document it produced in the lawsuit as confidential. The only thing Apple has ever designated is Gjovik's own deposition testimony — her own words about her own body and her own workplace complaints. Apple then sought contempt sanctions for Gjovik discussing the same topics she has been publicly discussing since 2021, that she filed in NLRB charges, that she pled in her lawsuit, that appear in published court orders, in a peer-reviewed medical journal, on a federal clinical trials registry, and in press coverage in the United States, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom.\n\nThe NLRB previously found merit in Gjovik's allegations, filed suit against Apple, and reached a national settlement in April 2025 requiring Apple to stop enforcing confidentiality policies that restrict workers' rights to discuss wages, hours, and working conditions. Apple agreed. Then Apple asked a federal court to do the same thing through a different mechanism.\n\nWHY THIS MATTERS TO EVERY WORKER\n\nThis case is not just about one worker and one tech company. It is about a tool that any employer can use against any worker — and that courts are approving without scrutiny.\nHere is what happened, step by step:\nA worker experienced something at work — her employer asked her to submit to studies of her reproductive health and intimate life.\nShe said no and complained — to her manager, to her coworkers, to the NLRB, to the EPA, to the press, and to the public.\nHer employer fired her.\nShe sued for retaliation.\nDuring the lawsuit, the employer obtained a "protective order" — a standard court order meant to protect genuinely sensitive business documents exchanged during litigation.\nInstead of using the protective order for documents, the employer used it to designate the worker's own testimony about her own experiences as the employer's "confidential business information."\nWhen the worker continued to speak publicly about the same experiences she has been describing for five years, the employer asked the court to hold her in contempt and order her to delete her speech.\nThe court denied the employer's motion — but then ordered the worker to delete her speech anyway, with no hearing, no evidence, and no motion requesting that relief.\nThe worker now faces an indefinite gag order. Anything her employer stamps "Confidential" becomes speech she is prohibited from uttering — and her employer gets to decide what that includes, with no judicial review before the restriction takes effect.\n\nThis is not unique to Gjovik's case. Workers who have litigated against Apple report being subjected to the same pattern: Apple obtains a protective order, designates the worker's complaints as confidential, uses the designations to derail the case, and the worker ends up silenced — whether by the court's order or by their own lawyer's advice to stop talking before things get worse. Plaintiff-side attorneys have described refusing to take cases against Apple entirely because the return on investment is destroyed by Apple's litigation tactics. The protective order is the mechanism that makes all of it possible.\n\nIf this framework stands, here is what it means for workers:\n\nYOUR BOSS CAN CLAIM YOUR COMPLAINTS ARE A TRADE SECRET.\nIf you report unsafe conditions, harassment, wage theft, or invasive surveillance, your employer can designate your account of what happened as its "confidential information" — turning your own words against you.\n\nYOU CAN BE GAGGED FROM TALKING TO YOUR COWORKERS.\nOrganizing requires communication. If your description of the problem is designated "Confidential," you cannot share it with the coworkers you are trying to organize — or you risk contempt of court.\n\nYOU CAN BE GAGGED FROM TALKING TO THE GOVERNMENT.\nThe gag order in this case makes no exception for communications with the NLRB, OSHA, the EPA, or any other government agency. A worker under this order who describes her working conditions to an NLRB investigator could be held in contempt.\n\nYOU CAN BE GAGGED FROM TALKING TO THE PRESS.\nThe order requires deletion of blog posts and social media. A worker who speaks to a journalist about her workplace experiences could be ordered to delete the interview.\n\nYOUR EMPLOYER DECIDES WHAT YOU CAN SAY.\nThe scope of the gag order is defined by whatever the employer designates. No judge reviews the designation before it takes effect. The employer stamps "Confidential"; the court enforces. The worker must comply or face contempt.\n\nTHE GAG HAS NO END DATE.\nThe order says speech is restricted "until found otherwise" — with no sunset, no timeline for adjudication, and no guaranteed process for resolution. It can last forever.\n\nYOUR EMPLOYER CAN USE THIS TO WIN THE LAWSUIT.\nIn this case, Apple's defense is that the worker was fired for "leaking confidential information." By designating her speech as confidential, Apple gets a court order saying her speech is confidential — before any trial determines whether it actually was. The gag order becomes evidence for the employer's defense.\n\nTHIS IS WHAT CONGRESS OUTLAWED NINETY-FOUR YEARS AGO\nThe Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 was passed because federal courts had become the bosses' favorite weapon — issuing injunctions to break strikes, ban picket lines, and silence workers who spoke up. Courts turned themselves into the enforcement arm of the employer class. Congress stripped federal courts of the power to issue injunctions in labor disputes because the courts couldn't stop siding with the employers.\nWhat this court did on March 30 is the same thing Congress outlawed ninety-four years ago: a federal judge issued an injunction silencing a worker's speech about a labor dispute, at the employer's request, without a hearing, without findings, and without meeting a single requirement of the law Congress passed to stop exactly this. The Norris-LaGuardia Act specifically protects "giving publicity to the existence of, or the facts involved in, any labor dispute." That is precisely what Gjovik has been doing — and precisely what the court has ordered her to stop.\n\nWHAT THE COALITION IS CALLING FOR\nThe organizations supporting this rally call on:\n— Federal courts to stop enforcing employer confidentiality designations as gag orders on worker speech without independent judicial review, findings of harm, and constitutional analysis;\n— The Northern District of California to revise its Model Protective Order to include explicit protections for worker speech about working conditions, consistent with the NLRA, the First Amendment, and California labor law;\n— Congress to investigate the use of litigation protective orders as a tool for suppressing worker organizing and whistleblower activity;\n— State and federal legislators to close the loophole that allows employers to use litigation protective orders to achieve the same worker silencing that the Speak Out Act, Silenced No More Act, and NLRA were enacted to prohibit;\n— The NLRB to issue guidance on the interaction between litigation protective orders and Section 7 rights, and to enforce the existing settlement Apple is violating;\n— Apple Inc. to withdraw its confidentiality designations over worker testimony about working conditions, comply with the April 2025 NLRB settlement it signed, and stop using the federal courts to silence the workers it fired for speaking.\n\nRALLY DETAILS\nWHAT: Rally and press conference for workers' speech rights\nWHEN: Thursday, April 2, 2026, 12:00 PM\nWHERE: Phillip Burton Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102 (main entrance, Golden Gate Avenue side)\nSPEAKERS:\n— Ashley Gjovik, Plaintiff in Gjovik v. Apple Inc.\n— Representatives of LaborMedia, Whistleblower United (WBU), California Coalition for Workers Memorial Day, WorkWeek, and the United Front Committee for a Labor Party (UFCLP)\n— [Additional speakers TBD]\n\nBACKGROUND\nGjovik v. Apple Inc., Case No. 3:23-cv-04597-EMC, is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California before Judge Edward M. Chen. Gjovik filed claims under California Labor Code sections 1102.5, 6310, 232.5, and 96(k), and a Tameny wrongful termination claim, alleging Apple fired her for reporting environmental hazards at a Superfund site where she worked, a skunkworks chip fab next to where she lived, reporting invasive employee surveillance and coercive medical studies, reporting other misconduct and risks/hazards, and organizing with coworkers about working conditions. The NLRB has found merit in dozens of Gjovik's allegations against Apple, the EPA conducted enforcement inspections based on her complaints and brought the first formal environmental enforcement action ever taken against Apple, and the GAO cited her public comments in a published report.\nIn February 2026, Gjovik filed a formal rulemaking petition with the U.S. Courts Advisory Committee on Civil Rules (Suggestion 26-CV-6), asking the Committee to address the growing use of protective order templates to circumvent workers' speech rights. The petition documents how courts issue these orders without the good cause findings required by the Federal Rules — and how employers then use them to silence workers' complaints. The Committee is scheduled to consider the petition on April 14, 2026.\nOn March 31, 2026, Gjovik filed three Rule 72(a) objections challenging the magistrate judge's orders, raising thirty issues including prior restraint on speech, lack of statutory authority, violation of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, Garmon preemption, the bankruptcy automatic stay, and the use of the protective order to prejudge the central merits question in a whistleblower retaliation case.\n\nCase documents are publicly available on CourtListener:\nhttps://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67843254/gjovik-v-apple-inc/\n\nAPPLE Bosses & Lawyers Panic As Whistleblower Ashley Gjøvik's Trial & Judgement Hearing Gets Close\nhttps://youtu.be/TdB3WYZgfwA\nFor more than 5 years Apple program engineering manager Ashley M. Gjøvik has fought to protect her health\n and safety at her office, stop an illegal fab production laboratory that was located right next to her apartment\n and a major apartment complex and get accountability and justice in this battle. She was illegally terminated\n by the company and now her legal cases are coming to coming to trial in months and also she is also close\n to winning a summary judgment against Apple. Gjøvik talks about her long legal and political battle facing\n many law firms hired by Apple costing tens of millions of dollars to crush here and throw her court cases out. \nShe also talks about the capture of oversight and regulatory agencies including Cal-OSHA, the EPA, the Bay \nArea Air Bay Area Air Quality Control District BAAQMD, the US Labor Department, Whistleblower Protection \nProgram and the NLRB.\nThis interview was done on 3/27/26\nAdditional Media:\nAI, Labor, Tech Workers & The Future Of SF & The World\nhttps://youtu.be/aizaKTB9eVo\nStrange Hecklers At Press Conference About Secret Apple Semiconductor Center\nhttps://leftcoastrightwatch.org/articles/strange-hecklers-at-press-conference-about-secret-apple-semiconductor-center/\nApple Fab Toxic Cover-up In Santa Clara Exposed At Press Conf-Apple Security Say They Work For 49ers\nhttps://youtu.be/TeHOyevjtuw\nApple Toxic Crimes, The Santa Clara FAB and The EPA With Fired Apple Whistleblower Ashley M. Gjøvik\nhttps://youtu.be/0j8m9Fs2VjU\nApple's Secret Silicon Fab Next to Thousands of Homes\nhttps://www.ashleygjovik.com/3250scott.html\nApple Whistleblower Ashley Gjøvik On Retaliation, Toxics & Corruption-Poisoning The People & Workers\nhttps://youtu.be/9hj0HSkCnL0\nThe Union Busting War On Apple Workers & NLRB Ruling For Fired Apple Worker Ashley M. Gjøvik\nhttps://youtu.be/ycxIbfO-pG0\nUS Labor Secretary Marty Walsh: Stop US DOL OSHA Whistleblower Corruption Now\nhttps://www.change.org/p/marty-walsh-stop-us-dol-osha-whistleblower-corruption-now\nhttp://justiceatapple.com/\nApple Toxic Is It Above The Law? With Whistleblower Ashley M. Gjøvik\nhttps://youtu.be/cvxNLu7BhaI\nPart II: My personal hellscape of conflicts of interest, obstruction, & arbitrary denials of due process continues…\nhttps://ashleygjovik.substack.com/p/field-notes-on-regulatory-capture-c08\nApple Wanted Her Fired. It Settled on an Absurd Excuse\nhttps://gizmodo.com/apple-wanted-her-fired-it-settled-on-an-absurd-excuse-1847868789\nApple Employee Blows Whistle on Illegal Spying and Toxic Working Conditions\nhttps://truthout.org/articles/apple-employee-blows-whistle-on-illegal-spying-and-toxic-working-conditions/\nSilicon Valley Chemical Contamination & Exposure\nhttp://www.whatsintheair.org/silicon-valley.html\nI thought I was dying: My apartment was built on toxic waste\nhttps://sfbayview.com/2021/03/i-thought-i-was-dying-my-apartment-was-built-on-toxic-waste/\nAshley Gjøvik\nwww.ashleygjovik.com\nProduction Labor Video Project\nwww.labormedia.net\n https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2026/03/31/18885315.php SUMMARY:Hands Off My Voice & My Body-Workers & Labor Groups To Rally At SF Federal Building LOCATION:San Francisco Federal Building\n450 Golden Gate St.\nSan Francisco URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2026/03/31/18885315.php DTSTART:20260402T190000Z DTEND:20260402T200000Z END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR