BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org
PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:Indybay-18846679
SEQUENCE:19006945
CREATED:20211207T071500Z
DESCRIPTION:12/11/21  Saturday  SF Rally At SF Japanese Consulate!  Stop Restarting The 
 NUKES!\n98th Action of NNA Committee\n\nSaturday December  11, 2021 3:00 PM 
 \nSan Francisco Japanese Consulate \n275 Battery St/California St. \nSan 
 Francisco \nSponsored by No Nukes Action \n\nJoin No Nukes Action to demand 
 a halt by the Japanes government to any dumping of  radioactive water from 
 tanks around the broken Fukushima nuclear plants\ninto the Pacifica ocean. 
 The governmennt also continues to push for the re-opening of more NUKE 
 plants despite the fact that the Fukushsima plant still is leaking 
 radiative\nmaterial more than ten years after the earthquake and 
 meltdowns.\n\nTEPCO, the operator  which is controlled by the Japanese 
 government  is also liable for some 16 trillion yen (about $140.83 billion) 
 to decommission the stricken \nFukushima Daiichi plant and pay compensation 
 to nuclear disaster victims but is fightng them in court. It will take 
 another 30 years for this plan to safeguard the plant.\nThe government also 
 continues to push nuclear power and the restarting of other plants in the 
 highly dangerous ring of fire which Japan is part of.\nMassive earthquakes 
 will continue to happen making another disaster and meltdown likely again. 
 A 7.0 or even 8.0 earthquake could cause many plants\nto meltdown 
 threatening the people of Japan and the world.\nPrime Minister Fumio 
 Kishida is carrying on the political agenda of the LDP of nuclear power and 
  more militarization of Japan\nincluding allowing the construction of US 
 bases in Okinawa desspite the fact that the vast majority  of  the Okinawan 
 people are against these bases.\nIt is time to speak out against the 
 nuclear threat of Fukushima that continues. The Japanese government while 
 it cuts benefits and public services is raising\nfinancial support for the 
 US military bases in Okinawa and throughout the country. The US Japan 
 Security Agreement is about more militarization and for war in\nAsia and 
 that is why the US has supported the efforts to repeal article 9 of the 
 constitution which prevents offensive war.\nThe continued support of 
 nuclear power threatens the lives of the people of Japan and the 
 world.\n\nPhysical distancing and masks for all participants at action 
 \nSpeak-out In Stop The Restarting Of The Nuke Plants \nDefense of the 
 Residents of Fukushima \nDon’t Dump The Radioactive Water In The Pacific 
 Ocean \nSaturdy December 11, 2021 3PM \nSan Francisco Japanese Consulate 
 \n275 Battery St/California St. \nSan Francisco \nNo Nukes Action 
 \nhttp://nonukesaction.wordpress.com/ \n\nIAEA delays Fukushima visit to 
 assess water release due to 
 omicron\nhttps://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/12/06/national/fukushima-iaea-visit/?fbclid=IwAR161cyvzL3CMHHlmaYqob9hjy89z8qnpbzgVWeI6IHuyl9FvUA_eWyvJ2Q\nTanks 
 at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant storing treated radioactive 
 water from the plant in February | KYODO\nKYODO\nDec 6, 2021\nThe 
 International Atomic Energy Agency has delayed an expert team’s visit to 
 the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant to assess the planned release of treated 
 radioactive water into the sea due to the omicron coronavirus variant, the 
 government said Monday.\nThe team’s visit, originally scheduled for 
 mid-December, will be postponed to January or later next year, according to 
 the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. The IAEA mission was aimed at 
 increasing transparency amid concerns over the water release plan raised by 
 China and South Korea as well as local fishing communities.\nWater pumped 
 into the ruined reactors to cool the melted fuel at the Fukushima plant hit 
 by a massive earthquake and tsunami in March 2011 has been accumulating at 
 the complex and mixing with rain and groundwater that has also become 
 contaminated.\nIt is treated using an advanced liquid processing system. 
 The process removes most radioactive material except for tritium, which is 
 said to pose little health risk.\nThe IAEA team is due to hear from Tokyo 
 Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. (Tepco), the operator of the Fukushima 
 plant, on conditions regarding the water at the plant and how it will be 
 discharged before compiling its view on safety.\nBy the end of the year, 
 the IAEA will hold a working-level meeting online with the industry 
 ministry to examine Tepco’s forecast of the effects of the water 
 discharge, ministry officials said.\n\n\n\nOkinawa: Race, Military Justice 
 and the Yumiko-chan 
 Incident\nhttps://apjjf.org/2021/22/Mitchell.html\n\nRichard A. Serrano, 
 with introduction and epilogue by Jon Mitchell\n\n\nNovember 15, 
 2021\nVolume 19 | Issue 22 | Number 2\nArticle ID 5650\n 
 \nIntroduction\n\nIn the book, Summoned at Midnight: A Story of Race and 
 the Last Military Executions at Fort Leavenworth(Beacon Press, 2019), 
 Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Richard A. Serrano revealed the racial 
 injustices of the US military justice system. Between 1955 and 1961, a 
 number of black and white prisoners were incarcerated on death row at Fort 
 Leavenworth military prison, Kansas, but ultimately all the white prisoners 
 were paroled and only African-Americans were hanged. \n\n \n\n\nSummoned at 
 Midnight: A Story of Race and the Last Military Executions at Fort 
 Leavenworth by Richard A. Serrano, Beacon Press, 2019.\n\n \nSummoned at 
 Midnight contained groundbreaking research – Publishers Weekly, for 
 example, called it, “An important contribution to the historiography of 
 race and justice” – but the book also included one important revelation 
 which was largely overlooked at the time of its release. Serrano had 
 uncovered the final fate of one of the most infamous criminals in post-war 
 Okinawan history: Sergeant Isaac J. Hurt. In September 1955, Hurt had raped 
 and murdered a six-year old girl, then abandoned her body on a garbage dump 
 in a crime which became known as the Yumiko-chan Incident. The killing 
 triggered outrage and Hurt’s court-martial on Okinawa received widespread 
 media coverage, but despite this public attention, one key point remained 
 hidden for more than six decades: what had actually happened to Hurt 
 following his trial? \n\nSerrano investigated Hurt’s case by interviewing 
 the men who had guarded him at the Fort Leavenworth prison, and tracking 
 down courts-martial records and letters at the National Archives and 
 Presidential Libraries. What he unearthed paralleled his other discoveries 
 in Summoned at Midnight; on Okinawa, too, racial politics strongly impacted 
 the military justice system and shaped how perpetrators were eventually 
 treated. \n\nIt is with great appreciation that we acknowledge the 
 permission of Beacon Press and Richard A. Serrano allowing The Asia-Pacific 
 Journal to publish the following excerpt from Summoned at Midnight. It is 
 hoped that many more people will be made aware of this important 
 investigation. After the excerpt, there is a brief epilogue which includes 
 reactions from residents of Okinawa Prefecture and why the murder remains 
 so raw in the minds of those on the island sixty-six years later today. 
 (Jon Mitchell)\n\n \n* * *\n\n \nIsaac Jackson Hurt and the Yumiko-chan 
 Incident\n\nSergeant Isaac Jackson Hurt died not at the end of an army rope 
 in Kansas but in a comfortable VA hospital in Ohio. On death row, most 
 everyone thought him aloof and cold-hearted. He was tall, thin, and quiet. 
 Later, as a free man, he worked as a night watchman. His new bride 
 cherished him as a “law-abiding, good and moral citizen.” One president 
 commuted his death sentence, and another president set him free.\n\n 
 \n\n\nIsaac J Hurt at Fort Leavenworth military prison, Kansas. (Courtesy 
 Richard A. Serrano)\n\n \nHe was arrested in September 1955, accused of the 
 rape and murder of five-year-old Yumiko Nagayama in Okinawa. Her assailant 
 had sliced open her abdomen with a knife and abandoned her body in a beach 
 quarry garbage dump near the China Sea. Her slaying drew uproars over what 
 is still known today as the “Yumiko-chan Incident." Crowds marched down 
 city streets in protest. Several other females had been raped by American 
 GIs, and after Yumiko died, another soldier attacked another child. 
 “Every Okinawan is burning with indignation!" cried the Okinawa Shimbun 
 newspaper.\n\nUntil then, Okinawans had been counseled not to resist their 
 occupiers. “Do not be anti-American," they were warned. "Do not be angry 
 or criticize, do not talk too much, never lie, always be truthful.... Never 
 put your hands above your ears, do not shout, speak calmly.” But Yumiko's 
 murder lifted their voices in anger.\n\nA student activist named Irei 
 believed fears of repression would never end until the Americans left their 
 homeland. “In tears," he said, “my university friends and I discussed 
 that these incidents were evidence of racial insult. I was convinced that 
 these crimes would never disappear unless we recover our human 
 rights."\n\nMany demanded that the United States “punish offenders of 
 this kind of case with the death penalty,” singling out Hurt. It marked 
 the first meaningful anti-American protests in a decade. Ten years earlier, 
 the island had been ravaged by Japanese and American troops fighting over 
 the string of beaches and coral reefs. The battle for Okinawa cost more 
 than two hundred thousand lives, soldiers and civilians alike, including a 
 third of the island population. Up to ten thousand Okinawan women had been 
 raped.\n\nTwo weeks after the girl's murder, Major General James E. Moore 
 spoke in a packed community hall and offered his “deep sympathy” to a 
 community relations advisory council. He promised change, suggesting 
 restricting or ending altogether his soldiers' leave time. But Okinawans 
 knew their economy would suffer if GIs were banned from shops and 
 restaurants. The general also admonished the more strident activists. To 
 suggest that Americans condoned violence, he cautioned, "is an insult to 
 the American people.” And he strongly defended the army's judicial 
 system. “There never has been an attempt at whitewashing or covering up 
 any case," General Moore declared.\n\nMitsuko Takeno, president of the 
 Okinawa Women's Association, argued that the army should immediately turn 
 Hurt over to Okinawan justice. “If this act was committed by an Okinawan, 
 the people would probably surround his house and stone it and indignation 
 will reach its peak and they will probably lynch this person," she warned. 
 “But because of the fact that it was committed by an American, nothing 
 has taken place so far."\n\nHomer Davis, the Leavenworth lawyer who later 
 represented Hurt on appeal, said Hurt should have been either tried in the 
 Okinawa courts or moved to a military courtroom in the States. “The 
 natives raised so much hell because it was one of many rapes our soldiers 
 perpetrated over there,” Davis recalled. “People were holding rallies, 
 5,000 at a time.”\n\nBefore the court-martial began, Hurt's army lawyer, 
 Captain Julian B. Carrick, asked that the soldier from Kentucky be returned 
 stateside for trial. He cited “the hostile attitude of the Okinawans” 
 and insisted their anger "prevented a fair trial” there.\n\nBefore his 
 arrest, Hurt had swilled some twenty beers and partied with prostitutes. 
 When army police caught him, he asked for a cigarette (his brand was Lucky 
 Strikes), and he teased the investigators. “I read the newspaper about 
 the girl's killing," he quipped. “I feel I might have been the one. It 
 could have been me.”\n\nAt his court-martial, the prosecution's best 
 witness was a scared nine-year-old boy. He had seen a GI who looked like 
 Hurt near the quarry but could not identify Hurt in a lineup. Yoshiko 
 Kamimura, a waitress, testified about bloodstains on Hurt's pants. Hair 
 samples were lifted from the door handle and seat cover in the sergeant's 
 rusted-out green-and-white Ford, but none matched the girl or tied Hurt to 
 the slaying. The best a Japanese professor could say was that the hairs 
 “could be” hers. Even on death row, Hurt still fixated about the hair 
 residue. “He swore they never really proved it on him," recalled social 
 worker Thompson. “He was always talking about hair samples.”\n\nThe 
 trial wore on for two weeks. In December 1955, Sergeant Hurt was convicted 
 and sentenced to die. He barely blinked. But his lawyer, Captain Carrick, 
 immediately asked for a reconsideration and leniency. He presented letters 
 and petitions from Hurt's hometown of Lothair in the coal-mining country of 
 southeast Kentucky. They described him as “honest” and “law 
 abiding.” Prosecutors countered with an affidavit showing the 
 thirty-one-year-old officer earlier had served eleven months in prison for 
 assault and attempted rape in Detroit.\n\nIn a private session with the 
 staff judge advocate, Hurt insisted he was innocent. He charged that 
 witnesses had lied or based their testimony on press accounts. He leaned 
 into the judge and claimed, “I didn't do it."\n\nHe said little on death 
 row. "He was very intoxicated over there and couldn't remember much about 
 his crime," recalled Sergeant Peterson. He never received mail from home. 
 "Once they had a flood in Kentucky and he said maybe the damned place 
 washed away, remembered Sergeant Ray. “He said that was why he never 
 heard anything from his people."\n\nHis military appeals failed, but Hurt 
 and his relatives in Kentucky managed to gain the ear of Kentucky 
 politicians. Representative Carl D. Perkins, a Kentucky Democrat and World 
 War II army veteran, wrote the White House. He described the growing 
 concerns from his district where Hurt “comes from” that "something 
 could be done about” commuting the sentence.\n\nIn the Senate, Thruston 
 B. Morton, a Kentucky Republican, personally forwarded a Kentucky VFW 
 resolution to the Eisenhower administration, urging a commutation. “The 
 conviction rests upon circumstantial evidence and there exists some doubt 
 concerning the guilt or innocence of the accused," the VFW 
 warned.\n\nSenator John Sherman Cooper, another Kentucky Republican, 
 pressed the White House on the hair samples. "Give this matter your deepest 
 consideration," he urged the president. “The death sentence is one that 
 should be very carefully meted out; it is so irrevocable.”\n\nSenate 
 Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson and Senator Ralph Yarborough, Texas 
 Democrats, asked a law firm to pursue Hurt's appeals. Texas lawyer Robert 
 J. Hearon Jr. warned White House assistant counselor Phillip Areeda that 
 executing Hurt “might very well constitute a manifest miscarriage of 
 justice."\n\nA brace of political muscle from powerful office holders from 
 two Southern states united to support this otherwise nondescript Kentucky 
 native. He was a local boy, one of theirs, and once protests over the 
 Okinawan slaying erupted into international anti-American outcries, they 
 rushed to defend this white American sergeant.\n\nBut in May 1959, Army 
 Secretary Wilber Brucker recommended death. “I have studied this case 
 carefully," Brucker said. “And I am convinced of the guilt of the 
 accused.” He also was disgusted that Hurt had falsified his enlistment 
 papers by not mentioning the earlier assault case in Detroit.\n\n \n\nThe 
 WW2 draft card of Isaac J Hurt. (US National Archives)\n\n \nHurt's 
 supporters kept pushing, though. Judge S. M. Ward of Hazard, Kentucky, 
 worked with Hurt's parents for a commutation. “The father of this 
 serviceman is eighty-eight years of age and his mother is seventy-seven," 
 Kentucky Republican representative Eugene Siler told Eisenhower. “They 
 have not seen their son for more than six years."\n\nHomer Davis tried to 
 win a new trial. At a federal court hearing in Kansas, he brought up the 
 outrage in Okinawa and the failed defense attempts to move the 
 court-martial off the island. “This was a sham, a pretense of a fair 
 trial.” Davis argued. But the judge was unimpressed and rejected the 
 appeal. Prison guards who brought Hurt to the Kansas City, Kansas, 
 courthouse in a six-jeep convoy returned him to death row at Fort 
 Leavenworth on what now seemed the end of the road.\n\nThe Eisenhower White 
 House was beginning to buckle under the weight of Hurt's influential 
 supporters. Hurt had never truly confessed. No eyewitness placed him with 
 the girl. His whereabouts that night was unexplained; even the drunken Hurt 
 could not remember. And the hair samples did not match. The attorney 
 general began to feel the death penalty was “inappropriate” and called 
 instead for a long prison sentence. Such a circumstantial case, he 
 suggested, would seem to “justify" executive clemency. Areeda in the 
 White House gnawed at his own doubts. “One can hold Hurt guilty only with 
 reservations," he reasoned.\n\nOn June 1, 1960, Eisenhower struck down the 
 death sentence and gave Hurt forty-five years in prison, with no parole. 
 Hurt was moved upstairs and, in the years ahead, served as an 
 administrative trustee at the Fort Leavenworth prison. Later transferred to 
 the federal penitentiary next door, he suffered a stroke in 1969 while 
 playing handball. Hurt lost the use of his right arm and leg and hobbled 
 with a cane around the prison yard, but still kept challenging his 
 forty-five-year sentence.\n\n“The way things are there is nothing to hope 
 for me," he wrote the warden. He wrote to the pardon attorney, the Senate, 
 and President Ford's attorney general, pleading for dismissal of his case 
 or at least parole. “I can only believe that I was sacrificed to appease 
 the dissident political elements who were demanding an end to American mil. 
 Occupation," he wrote, still haunted by the anger of the Okinawa protests 
 surrounding the murder.\n\nIn January 1977, President Ford made Hurt parole 
 eligible. Hurt limped out of prison, and by November, he began vocational 
 training at the Goodwill center in Cincinnati. He worked as a night 
 watchman, and in 1981, he married. A year later, his bride, Lura, a kitchen 
 helper, mailed papers to Washington trying to win him a full presidential 
 pardon. He was still waiting for word when he died in August 1984 at the VA 
 hospital.\n\n \nFrom Summoned at Midnight: A Story of Race and the Last 
 Military Executions at Fort Leavenworth by Richard A. Serrano. Copyright 
 2019 by Herbert Marcuse. Reprinted with permission from Beacon Press, 
 Boston Massachusetts.\n\n \n* * *\n\nEpilogue\n\nOn 23 September 2021, The 
 Okinawa Times published an article featuring details of Serrano’s 
 investigation into the parole and release of Hurt; many readers in Okinawa 
 and Japan learned for the first time that Yumiko-chan’s murderer had been 
 set free. \n\nAmong those reacting with anger to the news was Takazato 
 Suzuyo, co-chair of the group Okinawa Women Act Against Military Violence, 
 who said she was particularly aggrieved by Hurt’s claim that he had been 
 sacrificed for political reasons: "I think that kind of consciousness still 
 exists in the US military. The predisposition of the US military to look 
 down on the citizens of the prefecture is really 
 unforgivable.”\n\nTakazato also stated, “The US military is still 
 protected by the US-Japan Status of Forces Agreement. On the other hand, 
 the human rights of Okinawans aren’t protected. Is it okay for such an 
 abnormal situation to exist?”\n\nMiyagi Harumi, a researcher on the 
 history of Okinawan women, said she had been angered by the Japanese 
 government’s emphasis that the crime was the personal responsibility of 
 Hurt, suggesting it overlooked the larger, structural problem of the vast 
 US military presence in the prefecture. Miyagi, who was born in the same 
 year as the six-year old victim, said, “It could have been me – I think 
 it was a crime that could happen to anyone at any time. US military-related 
 incidents have occurred repeatedly and have been left unchecked.” 
 \n\nAccompanying the Okinawa Times article, a commentary discussed why the 
 Yumiko-chan Incident is still relevant in the Prefecture, which continues 
 to host 70% of the US military presence in Japan. Female Okinawans bear the 
 brunt of military violence; Takazato and her colleagues have recorded 
 hundreds of incidents of sexual violence committed by military personnel 
 since WW2, a problem highlighted by the rape and murder of a 20-year old 
 Okinawan woman by a former Marine in 2016. In the prefecture, as elsewhere 
 in the world, the US military justice system remains opaque and little 
 information is made public regarding courts-martial or punishment of 
 service members. \n\nHurt’s case also points to how US elected officials 
 prioritize the rights of military personnel over the lives of Okinawans. 
 Despite Hurt having been found guilty of the rape and murder of a six-year 
 old girl, he received the support of Senators, two sitting presidents and a 
 future president. Today, similar priorities are visible in the Japan-US 
 Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) which often shields Americans who commit 
 crimes against Okinawans from punishment under Japanese laws. According to 
 SOFA, the US military is granted jurisdiction over service members 
 suspected of committing offenses while on duty, only requiring them to be 
 transferred to the Japanese police after charges have been filed. The 
 system has hindered Japanese investigations into military crimes and the 
 problem has been exacerbated by Japanese prosecutors’ reluctance to 
 indict SOFA-protected suspects. \n\nEmphasizing such ongoing injustices was 
 one additional detail of Hurt’s case uncovered by Okinawa Times: today 
 Hurt lies buried beneath an official grave marker provided by the 
 Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA). The marker, in Reading Cemetery, 
 Hamilton County, Ohio State, cites his WW2 service in the US Navy prior to 
 his subsequent enlistment with the Army on Okinawa, with no mention of the 
 latter. \n\n \n\nThe VA-provided grave marker of Isaac J Hurt at Reading 
 Cemetery, Hamilton County, Ohio State. \n(Courtesy Hamilton County (Ohio) 
 Genealogical Society)\n\n \nAccording to the VA’s guidelines, such 
 markers ought not to be provided to service members dismissed from the 
 military under dishonorable discharges. Commenting on the matter to Okinawa 
 Times, Les’ A. Melnyk, Chief of Public Affairs and Outreach at the VA’s 
 National Cemetery Administration, confirmed that “discharge under certain 
 circumstances, including discharge or dismissal due [to] the sentence of a 
 general court-martial, precludes entitlement to VA benefits. In addition, 
 Veterans or Servicemembers who committed a capital crime or certain sex 
 offenses may also be barred from receiving burial and memorial benefits.” 
 Melnyk said the VA was actively reviewing the case and would take necessary 
 steps if it determined the marker had been provided in error. No further 
 information about VA findings was available at the time of completion of 
 this article on November 9, 2021.\n\n* * *\n\nNotes on the 
 excerpt\n\nInformation about Isaac Hurt's murder of a child in Okinawa, his 
 trial and appeals, the public outcry, and the US Army's public response are 
 drawn from Court-Martial Reports: Holdings and Decisions of the Judge 
 Advocates General, Boards of Review, and United States Court of Military 
 Appeals, Volume 22, 1956-1957, 630-37, Volume 23, 1957, 573-80, and Volume 
 27, 1958–1959, 3-60, in the Law Library at the Library of Congress, The 
 uproar and protests in Okinawa are also covered in Miyume Tanji, Myth, 
 Protest and Struggle in Okinawa (London: Routledge, 2006), 70-71; Yuki 
 Takauchi, “Rape and the Sexual Politics of Homosociality: The U.S. 
 Military Occupation of Okinawa, 1955–56," part of the History of Asian 
 Sexualities Series, on NOTCHES, a collaborative and international history 
 of sexuality blog. \n\nDavis, author interview, 1987. \n\nThompson, author 
 interview, 1987. \n\nPeterson, author interview, 1987. \n\nRay, author 
 interview, 1987. \n\nThe extraordinary pressure from Kentucky and Texas 
 politicians on behalf of Hurt is evident in letters stored among the 
 Eisenhower Presidential Papers. Representative Carl D. Perkins wrote the 
 White House on January 15, 1959; Senator Thruston B. Morton forwarded the 
 VFW letter to the White House on January 29, 1959. The VFW statement was 
 dated January 17, 1959. Senator John Sherman Cooper pressed the White House 
 on June 30, 1959. Texas lawyer Robert J. Hearon Jr. wrote the White House 
 on July 24, 1959, and August 4, 1959; on August 7, 1959, he advised that 
 Texas politicians were engaged in Hurt's behalf as well. Representative 
 Eugene Siler lobbied the White House on October 28, 1959. \n\nHomer Davis's 
 argument at the federal court hearing in Kansas City, Kansas, was delivered 
 on December 28, 1959, and reported by the Kansas City Star on December 28, 
 1959, and the Kansas City Times on December 29, 1959. \n\nInternal White 
 House memos, including assistant counselor Phillip Areeda's doubts about 
 the death sentence and Army Secretary Wilber Brucker's approval of death, 
 are available among the Eisenhower Presidential Papers.\n\nHurt's petition 
 for a "Commutation of Sentence" in which he claimed he was "sacrificed" to 
 quell the Okinawa protests, was signed August 11, 1975. It is available at 
 the National Archives. \n\nLura Hurt's "Character Affidavit" to win her 
 husband a full presidential pardon was dated July 8, 1982, and is at the 
 National Archives.\n\nFrom Summoned at Midnight: A Story of Race and the 
 Last Military Executions at Fort Leavenworth by Richard A. Serrano. 
 Copyright 2019 by Herbert Marcuse. Reprinted with permission from Beacon 
 Press, Boston Massachusetts\n\n* * *\n\nAsia-Pacific Journal would like to 
 thank those who assisted the publication of this article: Richard A. 
 Serrano, Jill Dougan, Abe Takashi, Sharon Morris, Heather Bowser, Mark 
 Steinke, and Mark Selden. \n 
 https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2021/12/06/18846679.php
SUMMARY:SF Rally At SF Japanese Consulate! Stop Restarting The NUKES!
LOCATION:Japanese Consulate\n275 Battery/California St.\nSan Francisco
URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2021/12/06/18846679.php
DTSTART:20211211T230000Z
DTEND:20211212T000000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR