BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org
PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:Indybay-18837592
SEQUENCE:18993852
CREATED:20201016T175900Z
DESCRIPTION:10/24 Public Education, Privatization, and Class Struggle\n\nSATURDAY, 
 OCTOBER 24, 2020 AT 12 PM PDT/2PM CST/3PM EST\nPublic Education, 
 Privatization, and Class 
 Struggle\nhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/84377536548?pwd=SXlQNnd0ODhYY0ZDWFF3bmh4RWhpQT09\nSaturday, 
 October 24, 2020 at 12 PM PDT/2PM CST/3PM EST  – 2:30 PM PDT\nThe 
 billionaires have been looting public education resources and funds for a 
 long time. They have been privatizing public schools. They have been 
 handing out federal and state funds meant for higher education to 
 “financial experts” retired from the IMF. In the last few years, 
 militant teachers, school staff, and teaching assistants have been striking 
 to fight back. This year on California ballot, Proposition 15 promises new 
 taxes to fund public education. Did the billionaires have a sudden change 
 of heart?\nJoin us for a discussion with distinguished panelists who have 
 been on the forefront of the fight for high-quality public 
 education!\nplaceholder.\nBeth Bowser, UCB UFCLP\nRick Baum, AFT 2121 SF 
 City College\nAngie Sijun Lou, UCSC COLA Striker\nCarol Lang, AFT PSC 
 Cuny\nGeorge Wright, AFT 1493 Skyline College & CSUC Retired\n\nUFCLP 
 Public Education Forum\nTime: Oct 24, 2020 12:00 PM Pacific Time (US and 
 Canada)\nSponsored by United Front Committee For A Labor 
 Party\nhttps://foramasslaborparty.wordpress.com\ncommitteeforlaborparty@gmail.com\n\nJoin 
 Zoom 
 Meeting\nhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/84377536548?pwd=SXlQNnd0ODhYY0ZDWFF3bmh4RWhpQT09\n\nProp 
 15: A Billionaire Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing! The Door is Still Wide Open 
 for Charterization – in Exchange for 
 Crumbs!\nhttps://foramasslaborparty.wordpress.com/2020/09/23/prop-15-a-billionaire-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-the-door-is-still-wide-open-for-charterization-in-exchange-for-crumbs/\nOakland 
 Teachers Vote to Authorize Strike, Stage 'Work-to-Rule' Actions in  Protest 
 of Low Pay - In These Times\nOakland teachers went on strike for a 
 dignifying wage, pension, and to stop charterization in 2019. Photo credit: 
 In These Times\n            The US is going into elections in a time of a 
 crisis of an unprecedented character and scope. Covid-19, an economic 
 crisis with a 33% loss of annual growth, the anti-racist popular revolt 
 sweeping across the country, fascist paramilitary thugs, the police hunting 
 down people of color in the streets, a race of blaming each other for the 
 crises between the two major parties, and huge cracks in the ranks of each 
 party – all these events and more have exacerbated each other at an 
 unbelievable pace the last few months. It would be naïve to believe that 
 the propositions on the ballot wouldn’t be divisive in this loaded 
 political and social atmosphere.\n\n            Proposition 15 in 
 California is just such a controversial, divisive one. It has already 
 generated a propaganda war between its supporters and opponents. In both 
 camps, one sees strange bedfellows. The UFCLP believes that the progressive 
 elements in Proposition 15 are designed as a concession and guise to cover 
 up for privatization.\n\n\nThe Sides\n\nOrganized labor in the education 
 sector has declared its full support to Prop 15. UAW 2865, in which the 
 teaching assistants of the University of California system are organized, 
 has included its support for Prop 15 in its “Anti-Austerity Campaign”. 
 Other educators’ organizations, such as CTA, CFT and OEA, have also 
 indicated their support.\n\nAt the same time, the Facebook CEO 
 Zuckerberg’s foundation, along with other billionaires’ charity and 
 social organizations, have declared their support for this proposition 
 also. An important section of organized labor in California walks hand in 
 hand with the tech titans in support of Prop 15. \n\nThe opponents, on the 
 other hand, consist mainly of small and medium property holders, 
 professional organizations and chambers of commerce. In short, the 
 Californian petite-bourgeoisie is the main opponent of Prop 15.\n\nThe 
 sides have been engaging in a guerilla-type propaganda war for some time. 
 Try watching a YouTube video in California without a “No on Prop 15” ad 
 – you won’t be able to. At the same time, UAW and CFT have been 
 organizing panels explaining their support, together with well-known left 
 wing figures and labor organizers, such as Mike Davis, as shock troops.\n\n 
 How does one explain this strange division along class lines? What could 
 have brought the top and the bottom of the class hierarchy together against 
 the angry middle?\n\n\nWhy the Support?\n\n            It is not difficult 
 to explain why the petite-bourgeois would oppose this Proposition. Since 
 the 1950s, Californian petite-bourgeoisie has opposed adamantly any 
 taxation of their property for public or any other purposes. Their 
 frustration with taxes led them to abandon the big cities and sprawl into 
 the suburbia. Sprawling, in turn, caused divestment from and 
 underdevelopment of the urban zones where poor people of color were 
 concentrated, as well as the uprooting of farmers of mostly of Hispanic 
 origin from agricultural areas that were transformed into suburban 
 settlements. The same frustration with taxation and petit-bourgeois 
 self-interest were also behind the 1978 “Tax Revolt”, which culminated 
 into Proposition 13 that year. Since then, all taxation on property is 
 effectively frozen in California, although the market value of landed 
 property has been skyrocketing. Why should we expect that this layer of 
 Californian society to suddenly act in a different way?\n\n            The 
 explanation for organized educators’ labor’s support is also seemingly 
 apparent – but only seemingly. The Proposition extends a generous offer 
 to public schools: 40% of the tax revenue, estimated between $6.5 billion 
 and $11.5 billion, is to be allocated to public education. Given the 
 four-decade long neoliberal assault on public education budgets, combined 
 with the most recent and vicious cuts that came with the pandemic, this 
 tempting offer has been welcomed as a much-needed and long-pending 
 relief.\n\n            But what about the big sharks who support Prop 15, 
 like Zuckerberg? After long-standing alliances with the petite-bourgeoisie 
 against taxation and public services, what caused their change of heart? 
 Did working-class misery and dreadful conditions of public schools finally 
 move them?\n\n            Of course not.\n\nFor sure, they are afraid of 
 organized labor’s power. In the past two years, Los Angeles and Oakland 
 teachers went on strike and won a pension and wage increase, however meager 
 it may be (2018-2019), and the UC’s graduate teaching assistants 
 (2019-2020) have been fighting for a cost of living adjustment, making some 
 ground.\n\nThe seemingly generous offer on the billionaires’ part is thus 
 fueled by fear of collective action. However, a closer look into the 
 Proposition’s text reveals an even more generous offer to the 
 bourgeoisie.\n\nMark Zuckerberg talks Facebook's plan to compete with rival 
 TikTok -  Business Insider\nMark Zuckerberg: billionaire tech-titan and 
 Charter-chain owner. Major proponent of Prop 15.\nThe “Hidden Gems” of 
 Prop 15\n\n              Let us turn to the text of the Proposition itself. 
 The 15-page long text is summarized with only a paragraph with four 
 additional clauses on the California Government’s website. All the 
 sentences that appear in the summary state the new taxes, the revenues they 
 would raise, who would be exempt, and where the money would go (40% to the 
 schools, as stated above). With relatively progressive taxation and more 
 funding of educational institutions as its public face, the proposition 
 impresses the initial reader and voter as a progressive one.\n\n            
 Buried deep down in the law text, however, lurks the cancer of 
 privatization. Section 4, Clause (2) allocates 89% of the revenue to 
 “school districts, charter schools, and county offices” (our emphasis). 
 Subclause (A) further specifies on what basis this revenue will be shared 
 between each school district and charter school. Clause (3) promises no 
 “less than $100 per unit of average daily attendance” to every 
 “school district and charter school” (our emphasis).\n\n            
 What are charter schools? Schools built with public money and resources, 
 then privatized and handed out to billionaires as sweet deals. And how do 
 they grow? By sucking up the resources and successful students from public 
 schools – just as cancer feeds off a sick person’s body. Furthermore, 
 they don’t hesitate to use the most cold-blooded methods of deception to 
 loot public resources. For example, they allocate no resources whatsoever 
 to students who need more help in learning, expelling low-performing 
 students towards the end of each school year. The expelled students are 
 then reabsorbed into the public education system, which has neither the 
 resources nor the time to help them out in their classes. This way, 
 charters inflate their scores, and sell this falsified data back to the 
 Boards of Schools as a “proof” that they are more successful than the 
 public schools, continuing the vicious cycle.\n\n            Now, Prop 15 
 offers not only resources sucked out of the public sector, but also new tax 
 revenues to the charter schools alongside with the public schools. It is 
 not enough for the billionaires to cut sweet deals with the State and feed 
 off public resources! They now want to devour the new tax revenues that 
 Prop 15 will create!\n\n            “But,” some may say, “public 
 schools are offered the same rate as charters! The Prop is still 
 progressive!” Charter schools, as we said, are like cancerous cells 
 feeding off the public school system’s metabolism. Fighting off cancer 
 requires destroying or cutting off the cancerous part of the body, not 
 offering the same nutrients to the healthy parts and the cancerous parts 
 for some “fair competition”. The same thing should be done with the 
 charters.\n\n            Moreover, charter schools have the upper hand both 
 financially and politically. Though they are privately owned, they have 
 expanded their share of public resource allocation with the blessing of the 
 political elite. The despicable tactics they employ to inflate their test 
 scores are well-known, but not one Democratic politician moves a finger to 
 stop this corruption. Should Prop 15 pass, charters will devour public 
 schools at an even faster pace with more money and resources in their 
 command. In these conditions, “offering equal resources” to both public 
 and charter schools amounts to weighing in on the side of the charters.\n\n 
            No wonder, then, billionaires like Zuckerberg have declared 
 their support for Prop 15. The taxes the Proposition imposes on them are 
 manageable; in return, they are to get even more funding for their 
 cancerous charter chains!\n\n\nTo Union Leaders: Which Side Are You On?\n\n 
            By declaring their unconditional support for Prop 15, education 
 unions are shooting themselves in the foot. They are striking an 
 unfavorable deal with the devil by accepting immediate relief, even though 
 the privatizing, charter-supporting vultures will devour them in the long 
 run anyways. By not explaining to their rank-and-file what Prop 15 entails, 
 the union bureaucrats are committing grave class treachery.\n\nSome might 
 oppose what we say because they believe this relief is desperately needed 
 as soon as possible, regardless of the potential for privatization 
 long-term. From their perspective, this might be the only chance to get a 
 deal as decent as Prop 15, and, given the abysmal conditions of the public 
 education system, anything is welcome. Prop 15 supporters believe sharing 
 resources with charters may be a necessary concession or simply are unaware 
 of the fact that charters are included in the proposition.\n\n            
 We would be the last ones to deny how grave the conditions of the public 
 education system are. Yet, precisely because of that, we are opposing Prop 
 15 as it stands because it gives the charters a strategic opening to attack 
 the public education system.\n\n            Moreover, this attitude 
 reflects the deep ambivalence of union bureaucrats. They ask nicely to the 
 billionaires for more, meanwhile viewing their own rank-and-file with more 
 suspicion than they view the bosses. We saw the disastrous impacts of such 
 an attitude very concretely during both the Oakland Teachers’ Strike in 
 2019 and the wildcat strike of UC TAs in 2020. In the former, the 
 bargaining team struck a quick deal with the Board of Supervisors without 
 telling the striking members. The wage increase was much less than what the 
 teachers initially demanded, and the question of charterization – one of 
 the key issues that triggered the strike – wasn’t addressed at all. In 
 the latter, the union leadership tried everything in its power to prevent 
 the wildcat action, giving the UC the reigns to crush it.\n\n            
 Now, the same bureaucrats are engaged in the same trickster maneuvers. They 
 lead their rank-and-file to believe that some crumbs are the best they can 
 hope to get from a capitalist feast. We believe the working class will not 
 win by begging. It will win by waging a bold struggle!\n\n\nWorking Class 
 Response: Living Wage and Sufficient Resources, Not Crumbs!\n\n            
 In its current form, Prop 15 is unacceptable for the working class and 
 public education. Although the additional resources the Prop offers are 
 welcome, the privatization it covers up cannot be tolerated. We therefore 
 propose the following demands in addition to the tax revenue the Prop 
 offers:\n\nStrike out all mentions of charters from Prop 15! Inscribe into 
 the Proposition clearly and explicitly that all resources emerging from the 
 new taxes will be allocated to public schools only!\nInclude into the 
 Proposition a fair living wage for all teachers, substitute teachers, 
 teaching assistants, librarians, staff, and all other personnel in public 
 education institutions!\nHire additional personnel (teachers, nurses, 
 janitors, librarians, and so forth) of adequate qualifications and numbers 
 to all understaffed public education institutions!\nTurn all charter 
 schools into public schools and public assets without compensation!  
 \nInscribe into the Proposition a capital tax for the billionaires to pay 
 for these measures!\nAs long as the door remains open for privatization, 
 the Proposition will threaten the interests of the working class. In order 
 to make Prop 15 the progressive law the union bureaucrats claim it to be, 
 the conditions enumerated above should be included. We should shut the door 
 of privatization and ensure the dignity of all education 
 personnel!\n\nUnited Front Committee for Labor Party, UFCLP\n\n\n\n 
 https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2020/10/16/18837592.php
SUMMARY:Public Education, Privatization, and Class Struggle
LOCATION:Link For 
 Program\nhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/84377536548?pwd=SXlQNnd0ODhYY0ZDWFF3bmh4RWhpQT09
URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2020/10/16/18837592.php
DTSTART:20201024T190000Z
DTEND:20201024T210000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
