BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org
PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:Indybay-18790880
SEQUENCE:18922246
CREATED:20160906T065500Z
DESCRIPTION:SLEEP PROTEST CONTINUES--SLOW, SUSTAINED, AND STEADY\nPleasant weather, 
 less police harassment, the lure of a safe(r) placer to sleep for at least 
 one night, and the pulse of principle reportedly drew a larger group of 
 sleepers last week and may continue to do so.  \n\nThe issue continues to 
 be the right to engage in necessary human functions in public places (with 
 no private places being generally available to the poor outside).  The 
 basic need and right to sleep runs afoul of the City's 11 PM to 8:30 AM 
 Sleeping Ban (MC 6.36.010a).  \n\nThis obscene law continues to be enforced 
 whimsically by the SCPD and increased posse of Parks and Recreation 
 Rangers, now acting as a genteel goon squad on Pacific Ave. \n\nELECTION 
 ANTICS\nWith election rhetoric rattling about, some are hoping that the 
 "Our Revolution: Santa Cruz for Bernie" bunch of endorsees (Drew Glover, 
 Steve Schnaar, Chris Krohn, and Sandy Brown) will bring light and 
 liberation to the City Council in the highly unlikely event that some or 
 all of them get past the Big Money endorsees  J.M Brown, Cynthia Mathews, 
 Martine Watkins, and Robert Singleton.  \n\nThough there have been a few 
 bright spots in the electoral forums, "support for finding legal supervised 
 places to sleep within City limits" and 24-hour bathrooms is about as far 
 as they seem willing to go.  Apparently a year of Freedom Sleeper education 
 about the futility and absurdity of banning sleep still can't get past the 
 desire to woo the most reactionary.\n\nMeanwhile RV residents report 
 increased pressure from the sheriffs in the County--in spite of the clear 
 Coastal Commission indications that anti-RV laws violate the public access 
 requirements of the Coastal Zone.   Still no reported tickets 
 though.\n\nSEATTLE STIRRINGS\nMeanwhile up in Seattle, a more active ACLU 
 and allied groups are fighting back against the destruction of "illegal" 
 homeless encampments. They aim to replace the current law and practice 
 which allow demolition with 72-hour notice.  The new law, if passed, would 
 require proof that encampments pose "an imminent and likely public health 
 or safety harm"; if a real emergency could be proved, then action could be 
 taken within 48 hours.     \n\nIn all other cases, the city would be 
 required to undertake a 30-day process to notify and offer services to the 
 people living in an encampment before forcing them to move. The law would 
 apply to tents, cars/trucks, and RVs.\n\nFor any encampment that did not 
 pose an immediate risk, outreach workers would have to, over the course of 
 30 days, offer the people staying there extensive outreach and "adequate 
 and accessible housing" before the city could clear the area. If an area 
 was going to be cleared, the city would have to notify the people living 
 there of the specific date and time when the cleanup would occur and 
 provide an explanation of what would happen during that process.\n\nThe law 
 would also set up a more thorough process for documenting and storing 
 people's belongings that are taken during cleanups. It would require the 
 city to provide trash pickup and sanitation services to any camps with more 
 than five people, and it would create an advisory group to oversee the 
 sweeps. If the city violated any terms of the new law while doing sweeps, 
 it would have to pay each person affected $250 per violation.\n\nFor more 
 information check out 
 http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2016/08/24/24504796/homeless-advocates-propose-major-reforms-to-the-way-the-city-handles-homeless-encampments 
 \nand http://www.columbialegal.org/standing-shelter-everyone .\n\nBUT BACK 
 IN SANTA CRUZ\nMeanwhile, City authorities dutifully backed up by the 
 Scent-Anal (the local daily) have been pushing their old brand of paranoia 
 with an announced  indefinitely-extended "closing of the levee".\nActually 
 for a long time cops and rangers have selectively excluded the public 
 (particularly the poor) from access to the river.  Now a killing has become 
 the pretext for a general shut down--more grist for the Take Back Santa 
 Cruz agenda--with those who live outside being the usual targets.\n\nCheck 
 out the stench of this sort of bigotry--all dressed up in witty words and 
 fancy formatting.  Hatred masquerading as public safety.   Sniff out the 
 garbage at http://www.santamierda.com/. \n\nWINDBLOWN 
 WHISTLEBLOWERS\nActivists Pat and John Colby, evicted from their lodging 
 after several years of fighting the powerful John Stewart Company, are 
 reportedly spinning straw into silk.  They're active reporting ADA 
 (Americans Disability Act) violations in city park restrooms and reportedly 
 getting the promise of action.    The old HUFF "Give a Shit" Campaign 
 demanded 24-hour bathrooms at City Hall.   \n\nBut City workers even had 
 those bathrooms locked tight during business hours on the afternoon of the 
 last Freedom Sleeper protest.   Makes it easier to complain about all the 
 pee and poopoo.    The new supposedly public Portapotty at Lincoln and 
 Cedar is also still locked during the day.  If authorities won't give a 
 shit,  they'll find others will have to.  In inconvenient spots.   Tip of 
 the hat to Pat and John for acting as a mobile monitoring squad--forcing 
 the City to clean up its commodes.\n\n 
 https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2016/09/05/18790880.php
SUMMARY:Sleepers Assemble for Freedom SleepOut #61
LOCATION:Snooze Along with the Suffering on the Sidewalk Near City Hall (Center 
 between Locust and Church)\nFrom late Tuesday afternoon to Wednesday 
 morning.
URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2016/09/05/18790880.php
DTSTART:20160907T000000Z
DTEND:20160907T000000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
