BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org
PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:Indybay-18746570
SEQUENCE:18854661
CREATED:20131120T061500Z
DESCRIPTION:11/21 Oakland Protest/Press Conference Stop Union Busting Against BART 
 Workers\nHands Off BART Workers\n\nEmergency Demonstration On Thursday 
 November 21, 2013 8:15 AM - 8:45 AM\nIn Front Of BART Building\n344 20th 
 St. Oakland, California\nBoard Meeting on Thursday October 24, 2013 at 8:30 
 AM in front of the 20th St. Mall\nBART Board Room Kaiser Center 20th Street 
 Mall\nThird Floor - 344 20th Street, Oakland, California 94612\n\nThe BART 
 managers and the BART Board of Directors continue their war on the workers 
 who make BART run. After the murder of two replacement workers the BART 
 managers signed a contract that included paid family leave. This should be 
 a right and benefit that all working people have but now the BART board 
 says that they want that contract clause removed because "it costs too 
 much".\nThis for a board that paid Veolia Transportation VP Thomas P Hoch 
 $399,000 along with giving his company tens thousands of dollars to break 
 the strike.\nThe confrontational attack on the BART workers and the unions 
 cannot be ignored. It must be answered by all working people who face 
 similar attacks. These managers need to be jailed for their health and 
 safety practices that have led to deaths not only of the two workers who 
 crossed the picket lines but BART worker James Strickland in 2008.\nThe 
 United Public Workers For Action is also calling for a labor 
 tribunal/hearing to exposed the criminal negligence of these managers and 
 for their jailing.\nWe also believe that concession/regressive bargaining 
 has only weakened the power of labor and that if the contract is voted down 
 by the BART board workers should directly link up with AC ATU 1555 worker 
 for joint action.\n\nStop Concession/Regressive Bargaining, Prepare for 
 united action with ATU 192 AC transit workers\nNo Contract No 
 Work\nEstablish Workers Tribunal On The Health and Safety at BART and 
 Managers and Board\nJail BART managers of murder and Recall BART Board 
 Members and Replace With Labor/Community candidates\nStop Union Busting And 
 Attacks On Transit and All Public Workers\n\nInitiated By\nUnited Public 
 Workers For Action UPWA www.upwa.ing\n\n\nBART, union reps meet on disputed 
 provision's 
 cost\nhttp://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/BART-union-reps-meet-on-disputed-provision-s-cost-4992362.php\nJohn 
 Wildermuth\nPublished 7:06 pm, Monday, November 18, 2013\n\nBART officials 
 met with representatives of its two largest unions Monday in an effort to 
 determine just how much a disputed family leave contract provision could 
 end up costing the transit district.\n\nThe 90-minute technical conference 
 at BART's Oakland headquarters was for financial people only and didn't 
 involve any negotiations about the contract, which both unions ratified 
 Nov. 1 The district's directors said Friday night that the section 
 providing workers with six paid weeks of family leave was signed in error 
 and called for contract talks to be reopened.\n\nThe unions aren't 
 interested in new talks.\n\n"We want to make very clear that (Service 
 Employees International Union Local 1021) is participating in the costing 
 meeting today for the very limited purpose of determining the accuracy of 
 the district's assumptions and methodology," Kerianne Steele, an attorney 
 for the union, said in a note to Vicki Nuetzel, BART's attorney. "SEIU's 
 participation should in no way be construed as interest on our part to 
 resume negotiations."\n\nEven so, there was plenty to talk about Monday. 
 BART directors have been using cost estimates for the medical leave 
 provision that range from a high of $44.2 million over the four-year life 
 of the contract all the way down to $5.8 million over the same period, 
 depending on assumptions about how many union workers will use the 
 leave.\n\nUnion challenges numbers\nThe numbers at the top end are 
 ridiculously high and are based on unrealistic assumptions, said Peter 
 Castelli, executive director of the SEIU, which is BART's largest 
 union.\n\n"If you assumed that every BART employee was going to call in 
 sick on a certain day, I imagine that would be expensive," he said at a 
 Monday morning news conference. "But that's not going to happen, and 
 neither is this."\n\nThe $44.2 million figure, for example, assumes that 
 one-third of all SEIU and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1555 workers will 
 take all six weeks of paid leave every year. But even if the number of 
 union workers taking that family leave doubles from the 2012 level, the 
 four-year cost plummets to $21.9 million, less than half the top-end 
 number.\n\nThe district's low-end $5.8 million, four-year estimate assumes 
 no increase in the number of workers taking family-care leave or in the 
 4.3-week average length of those leaves.\n\nCurrently, employees may take 
 up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to deal with serious personal or family 
 health issues or to bond with a newborn or newly adopted child. BART 
 workers now can use vacation, sick leave or other accrued time off for that 
 leave.\n\nBut under Section 4.8 of the new contract, which BART says its 
 negotiators signed in error, the district would provide "six weeks of paid 
 time off to take care of a seriously ill child, spouse, parent or domestic 
 partner or to bond with a new child."\n\nThe change doesn't affect BART 
 workers directly, because they would not receive paid leave for their own 
 medical problems, Castelli said.\n\n"This is not a personal benefit," he 
 said. "It's a good, useful benefit for our workers, but it's not going to 
 affect that many people."\n\nBART cites accidental OK\nAccording to BART 
 officials, the medical leave proposal was rejected twice in June but 
 accidentally signed in July by Thomas Hock, the transit district's chief 
 negotiator, and two other district leaders when it was included in a stack 
 of other tentative agreements both sides had agreed on.\n\nThat explanation 
 doesn't ring true with union leaders.\n\n"As a negotiator, your tentative 
 agreements are your bible, and you're constantly reviewing them," Castelli 
 said. "Any misunderstandings are usually resolved way before it gets to 
 this point."\n\nAfter the unions announced a tentative contract agreement 
 on Oct. 21, ending a four-day strike, BART and union negotiators met for 
 two days to go over the entire contract and deal with any questions or 
 disputed language. There was no suggestion that the medical leave proposal 
 was a problem, Castelli said.\n\n"There were joint meetings to go over the 
 contract language," said James Allison, a BART spokesman. "I don't know if 
 (the medical leave provision) was discussed."\n\nWhile BART directors are 
 scheduled to vote on the new contract at their meeting Thursday, no one is 
 saying what will happen if the unions hold fast to their decision not to 
 reopen the deal.\n\n"We consider the negotiations finished," Castelli 
 said.\n\nJohn Wildermuth is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. 
 E-mail:jwildermuth@sfchronicle.com\n 
 https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/11/19/18746570.php
SUMMARY:Oakland Protest/Press Conference Stop Union Busting Against BART Workers Hands Off BART Wo
LOCATION:In Front Of BART  Offices\n344 20th St. Oakland, California
URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/11/19/18746570.php
DTSTART:20131121T161500Z
DTEND:20131121T170000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
