BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:www.indybay.org
PRODID:-//indybay/ical// v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:Indybay-18709742
SEQUENCE:18802095
CREATED:20120320T183100Z
DESCRIPTION:3/28 Anniversary of Three Mile Island SF Speak-out/From Three Mile Island 
 To Fukushima\n\nThere will be a anniversary rally on the date of the 
 nuclear disaster in Three Mile Island and the connection with the Fukushima 
 melt-down last year. There will be an open mike at Powell and Market on 
 March 28 at 5:00 PM\n\nMarch 28, 2012 Powell and Market, San Francisco 5:00 
 PM \n\nThere will be a speak-out on the anniversary of the nuclear accident 
 at Three Mile Island. The No Nukes \nAction Committee and other individuals 
 and organizations will be meeting at Powell and Market in San Francisco 
 \non March 28, 2012 to speakout about the dangers of nuclear power/weapons 
 and the lessons of \nThree Mile Island And Fukushima. Today in California 
 two dangerous plants are operating at San Onofre and Diablo Canyon. They 
 are a danger \nto people throughout California yet the California Public 
 Utility Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission continue to not 
 \nonly allow them to operate but want the tax and rate payers to subsidize 
 nuclear power. All organizations are invited to endorse are invited to 
 speak out on this anniversary \nand the connections today. There will be an 
 open mike. \n\nFor more information contact \nNo Nukes Action Committee 
 \nhttp://nonukesaction.wordpress.com/ \n3/28 Anniversary of Three Mile 
 Island SF Speak-out/From Three Mile Island To Fukushima \n917-774-4079 
 \n311bayarea(at)gmail.com\n\nCalifornia Nuclear Backlash Mounts After Japan 
 Meltdown: Energy \nBy Julie Johnsson and Mark Chediak - Mar 7, 2012 9:39 AM 
 PT 
 \nhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-07/california-nuclear-backlash-mounts-after-japan-meltdown-energy.html 
 \n\nHeadrick Questions Nuclear Plant's Safety Measures \nTwo nuclear power 
 plants perched near earthquake faults in California could struggle to get 
 relicensed after a cascade of natural and nuclear disasters across the 
 Pacific Ocean in Japangalvanized opposition groups. \nFukushima-inspired 
 concerns have rippled through Orange County, where the cities of Laguna 
 Beach and San Clemente asked regulators to decide whether Edison 
 International (EIX)’s San Onofre atomic plant 60 miles (97 kilometers) 
 southeast of Los Angeles could withstand an earthquake and tsunami before 
 extending its permit to 2042 from 2022. Further north, PG&E Corp. (PCG) 
 asked for a delay in relicensing Diablo Canyon pending seismic studies. 
 \nEnlarge image \nDry cask storage contains spent fuel that has already 
 been cooled in the spent fuel pool for at least one year. Source: NRC 
 \n“An accident would be devastating” at San Onofre, Laguna Beach Mayor 
 Jane Egly said in an interview in her home overlooking the seaside enclave. 
 “If they don’t do anything to address our safety concerns, I would 
 support shutting it down.” \nNuclear anxiety in the most populous state, 
 a bellwether for political and environmental issues nationwide, is echoing 
 inNew York, Ohio, Virginia and Vermont, where local groups oppose 
 operators’ efforts to extend the lives of their plants. \nEleven U.S. 
 power companies including Edison, PG&E,Entergy Corp. (ETR) and Progress 
 Energy Inc. (PGN) seek 20-year license extensions to keep 15 atomic 
 generators running through age 60. \nAt stake is whether reactors designed 
 in the 1960s and 1970s, the same vintage as those overwhelmed by a 
 9.0-magnitude quake and 46-foot (14-meter) tsunami in Fukushima, Japan, 
 should remain the foundation of a 104-reactor U.S. fleet through mid- 
 century. The debate over atomic energy, which provides about 20 percent of 
 the nation’s power, extends even into new projects. \n‘Fukushima Never 
 Happened’ \nGregory Jaczko, chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
 Commission, stoked concerns over costs and safety of new reactors Feb. 9 
 when he cast the lone vote of the five commissioners against granting 
 Southern Co. (SO) the first reactor licenses in 30 years. \nJaczko warned 
 the U.S. atomic regulator had proceeded “as if Fukushima never 
 happened.” \nFailure to extend licenses would hurt PG&E and Southern 
 California Edison, the utility owned by Rosemead, California- based Edison. 
 San Onofre is among its largest and most valuable assets, and the 78 
 percent stake owned is valued at $5.2 billion, according to a regulatory 
 filing. \nShares in Edison have gained about 13 percent since the March, 
 11, 2011, atomic disaster in Japan. PG&E has lost 9 percent in the period, 
 while the Dow Jones Utilities Average index (UTIL) has gained 8 percent. 
 \nNo Nuclear Revival \nSince a nuclear revival in the U.S. is at least a 
 decade away, “one of the biggest concerns for industry and regulators 
 will be to ensure that important systems, structures and components” at 
 existing plants function safely for another 20 years, said Chris Gadomski, 
 lead nuclear energy analyst for Bloomberg New Energy Finance in San 
 Francisco. (FRC) \nThe NRC has extended licenses for 71 reactors since 2000 
 and has never shut down a plant that sought relicensing, although it has 
 withheld permits until safety concerns were satisfied, NRC spokesman David 
 McIntyre, said in an e-mail. \nPlant operators don’t think new safety 
 concerns should have any bearing on relicensing because regulators and the 
 industry are addressing them separately and continuously, Steve Kerekes, 
 spokesman for the Nuclear Energy Institute, a Washington-based industry 
 lobbying group, said in a phone interview. “It’s a rigorous process,” 
 he said. \nOlder Plant Limitations \nFukushima highlighted the limitations 
 older reactors face in withstanding unusual events, such as prolonged 
 blackouts or freak tidal waves, not anticipated by the original designers, 
 said California seismologist Bruce Gibson. He serves on a state- appointed 
 panel monitoring a seismic review of the Diablo Canyon plant on the central 
 California coast. \nNew reactors, such as the AP1000 from Toshiba Corp. 
 (6502)’s Westinghouse Electric unit that Atlanta-based Southern is 
 erecting in Georgia, are designed to safely shut down 72 hours after a 
 station blackout without any human intervention, Scott Shaw, a Westinghouse 
 spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement. \n“I felt like this was the 
 moment to get something done,” said Ben Davis, Jr., 58, a semi-retired 
 home health care worker who leads a state ballot initiative to close the 
 plants. Davis was emboldened by his previous success in a 1989 drive that 
 led to shutting down the Rancho Seco nuclear plant near Sacramento. \nIf 
 Davis gathers 504,760 signatures on his petition by next month, California 
 voters will be able to vote to close the plants in November. He wouldn’t 
 say how many he has collected. \nMore Relicenses Coming \nRelicensing is 
 under way for some of the nation’s most contested plants. In New York, 
 Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo has vowed to shut down Entergy’s Indian 
 Point reactors, 24 miles north of New York City. \nAlso seeking a 20-year 
 extension is FirstEnergy Corp. (FE)’s Davis-Besse plant, 21 miles 
 southeast of Toledo, Ohio, which was shut from 2002 through 2004 because of 
 leaks and reactor corrosion. Progress Energy is seeking to relicense a unit 
 of its Crystal River plant, 80 miles north of Tampa, Florida, even though 
 the reactor has been closed since 2009 for repairs. \nLicense renewals look 
 at potential environmental impacts and a plant’s ability to keep 
 decades-old components in good operating condition, Scott Burnell, an NRC 
 spokesman, said in an e-mail. Issues such as seismic risks and blackout 
 precautions are considered normal operating matters covered by the 
 regulator’s continuing oversight process. \nNew Fukushima-related rules, 
 expected to be released by March 9, likewise “will apply to every 
 operating reactor, regardless of whether a reactor’s license has been 
 renewed,” Burnell said. Plant operators will have until 2016 to comply 
 with the orders, which will cost U.S. utilities about $100 million, 
 according to the Nuclear Energy Institute. \nDiablo Delay \nFollowing the 
 Fukushima catastrophe, San Francisco (FRC)-based PG&E asked the atomic 
 regulator to hold off relicensing Diablo Canyon, 190 miles north of Los 
 Angeles, until the company finishes a new study of the earthquake risks, 
 including a fault discovered in 2008 that runs 600 meters offshore from 
 Diablo Canyon’s reactors. \nSan Onofre and Diablo Canyon are on the ocean 
 in areas prone to earthquakes. They are the only plants in the U.S. with 
 geography similar to Fukushima, where three reactors melted down when the 
 station lost power after unprotected diesel generators were swamped by the 
 tsunami. \n“This plant has been and will be run safely in the future,” 
 Anthony Earley, Chief Executive Officer of PG&E, said of Diablo Canyon in a 
 Feb. 23 interview. Edison has told state regulators its plant could 
 withstand an earthquake and tsunami, based on updated data, and plans a 
 further study of its seismic risks. \nEquipped For Disaster \nUtility 
 officials say California’s reactors are better equipped for disaster. San 
 Onofre, which rises from a strip of land between a beach and a freeway, has 
 four back-up generators stored 30 feet above sea level and a seven-day 
 supply of diesel fuel in earthquake-fortified underground vaults. Batteries 
 with eight hours of back-up power are kept 50 feet above sea level, while 
 the utility has 4.5 million gallons of water on site that can used to cool 
 the reactors, according to Southern California Edison (SCE1)’s website. 
 \nDiablo Canyon is similarly fortified and built atop an 85- foot cliff, 
 almost three times higher than the greatest anticipated wave in the area, 
 said James Becker, site vice- president, in a phone interview. \nSouthern 
 California Edison will decide this year whether to ask state regulators to 
 fund renewing San Onofre’s operating licenses, which expire in 2022, said 
 Stephen Pickett, a spokesman for the utility. Repairing steam generators 
 after a small radiation leak shut the plant in January will not affect the 
 timing of relicensing, Pickett said by telephone. \n‘Open Safety 
 Issues’ \n“It will be difficult to go before the commission to ask them 
 to make a decision to pursue relicensing and at the same time have open 
 safety issues at the plant that have heightened community concern and 
 introduced the potential for additional costs,” said Anne Selting, a San 
 Francisco-based credit analyst for Standard & Poor’s (SPY), in a 
 telephone interview. \nPG&E’s Earley described Diablo Canyon as a crucial 
 asset to his company and the state of California, and said he is prepared 
 to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on safety upgrades, if needed to 
 keep it running. \nClosing the plants abruptly would also have 
 environmental and consumer consequences: greater smog, rolling blackouts 
 and higher electricity bills reminiscent of the energy crisis in 2001, 
 according to a November 3, 2011 legislative analyst report on the nuclear 
 ballot initiative. \nLosses to the two utilities could total more than $4 
 billion, which they would attempt to recoup from customers through higher 
 rates and from state taxpayers by suing, the report said. \nThe San Luis 
 Obispo Mothers For Peace, an anti-nuclear group, says residents of their 
 community are more concerned by the economic toll from an accident at 
 Diablo Canyon, 12 miles to the west. \n“No utility or regulator can claim 
 they know the worst- case scenario,” said Jane Swanson, a board member of 
 the group, which has opposed the plant since the early 1970s. \n\n\n§Three 
 Mile Island workers\nby No Nukes Action Committee Tuesday Mar 20th, 2012 
 10:25 AM\n\nthree_mile_island_workers...\n\nThree Mile Island 
 workers.\n§Fukushima man made disaster\nby No Nukes Action Committee 
 Tuesday Mar 20th, 2012 10:25 AM\n\nfukushima_nuclear_plant_d...\n\nThe 
 Fukushima plant had serious safety problems prior to the melt-down that 
 were covered up by TEPCO, the Japanese government and General Electric 
 which built the plant.\n§San Onofre nuclear plant has safety problems\nby 
 No Nukes Action Committee Tuesday Mar 20th, 2012 10:25 
 AM\n\nsan_onofre_and_sea.jpg\n\nThe San Onofre plant is presently shut down 
 due to leaks in a new $670 million dollar turbine. This plant is rated the 
 most dangerous in the US and the company Southern California Edison is 
 pushing to continue to keep it running and make the public pay for 
 this.\n\n https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2012/03/20/18709742.php
SUMMARY:Anniversary of Three Mile Island SF Speak-out/From Three Mile Island To Fukushima
LOCATION:Powell and Market St. San Francisco
URL:https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2012/03/20/18709742.php
DTSTART:20120329T000000Z
DTEND:20120329T010000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
