$23.00 donated in past month
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay FeatureRelated Categories: California | East Bay | Anti-War | Education & Student Activism | Government & Elections | Immigrant Rights
UC Berkeley Sponsors Muslim Basher: Drive Out the Trump Regime! Start with John Yoo
Torture advocate John Yoo and his handlers at Boalt Hall think Donald Trump's "new" Muslim ban is A-OK. Despite a decade of community protest against the corruption of young legal minds by a resident war criminal with a dangerous philosophy of exceptionalism - that American lives are worth more than other people's - law school administrators deny consequences of Yoo's professional misconduct. Professor Yoo shames the university every time he opens his mouth. His legal "opinions" further the illegal agenda of America's deporter-in-chief Trump.
UC Berkeley provides a platform for normalization of crimes of torture, massive surveillance, indefinite detention, and war when they lend credence to the unconstitutional interpretations of executive power advanced by employee John Yoo. It is our responsibility to call out criminals and enablers alike.
The World Affairs event, http://www.worldaffairs.org/events/event/1700#.WL892xIrLpC on Thursday March 9, 6:30PM features a post-discussion Q&A, when you will have the chance to engage directly with Berkeley Law's biggest nightmare. The World Affairs Auditorium is located at 312 Sutter Street, Suite 200, San Francisco. Non-member price $20, $7 for students.
"Yoo's legal analyses justified acts of outright torture," concluded a 2009 Department of Justice ethics report. The University of California (where Yoo is tenured) and the Pennsylvania Bar Association (where Yoo is licensed) dismissed Berkeley Law students' and Bay Area Lawyers' demand for accountability. Failure to enforce statutory codes of conduct serves an untoward lesson: that some people are above the law and/or that criminal actions are acceptable, even commended, if you're clever enough to avoid getting caught.
"I think the new order will withstand judicial scrutiny," says Yoo. "Because it grants admission to all existing visa holders and permanent resident aliens, it is difficult to see who has standing to challenge this order.... Aliens outside our territory with no pre-existing connection to the U.S. do not have rights under the Constitution that can be recognized in court. This time, the order explicitly relies on the findings of the last administration and the agencies that the six nations in question are state sponsors of terrorism or are countries where terrorist [activities] are matters of high concern. The editing out of special exceptions for Christian minorities undermines criticism that this order arises from anti-religion bias. It will be much harder to show connections between anti-Muslim statements made during the campaign and the motives behind this order..."
John Yoo is unqualified to teach the next generation of lawyers and judges. He should have been discharged years ago, his academic veneer stripped away.