top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

License Plate Scanners a Violation of the Fourth Amendment

by Holly Day
Response to an article written in the Contra Costa Times concerning the tracking of innocent civilians by police license plate scanners.
The May 28 Contra Costa Times article "Police Cars to Get License-plate Readers" does not fully express the potential of license plate trackers on police vehicles. The article focuses on instances where these cameras could be used to protect civilians from crime, when in truth, civilians should be more concerned about being tracked by the police.

The government has set up many different ways to track people which includes the license plate scanners that are discussed. While they defend their vast spending on these different spying tactics with the idea that they are out to protect and fight crime, the truth is that these trackers are used as ways to suppress civilians. This leads to a complete lack of privacy.

This article does not express the full potential of these license plate scanners, and people need to know that they, although innocent, are being tracked by the government. Ultimately, this surveillance is a violation of the Fourth Amendment which gives people the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures without probable cause.

Original Article Link:

http://www.contracostatimes.com/my-town/ci_25854169/alameda-police-cars-get-license-plate-readers
by Kyle
Scanning plates in public view is not a violation of the 4th ammendment. There are numerous cases in scotus that addresses this. The person isnt being tracked the car is being scanned, plain and simple. When you respond to this with the Jones gps case I argue that is the reason to have a good data retention poicy so groups can not argue the mosaic effect. As all new good tools in LE someone has to find issues with it.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network