SF Bay Area Indymedia indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate

California | U.S. | Animal Liberation

Time to ban foie gras
by Alisa Mullins
Thursday May 24th, 2012 10:44 AM
Starting July 1, it will be illegal to sell foie gras in California. It should be illegal everywhere.
With California's foie gras ban poised to take effect in less than two months, some of the Golden State's chefs are scrambling to mount a last-minute campaign to overturn the ban. Birds raised for foie gras are force-fed up to 4 pounds of grain and fat every day via a pneumatic tube that is rammed down their throats—a process that former California Sen. John Burton colorfully describes as "doing the equivalent of waterboarding."

California should uphold its ban on foie gras—and the rest of the U.S. should follow the state's progressive lead.

Burton, who spearheaded California's ban and built in a seven-year grace period specifically to allow California's lone foie gras producer, Sonoma-Artisan Foie Gras, to come up with an alternative to force-feeding birds, has no patience for the chefs' last-ditch appeal.

"They've had all this time to figure it out and come up with a more humane way," he said. "I'd like to sit … them down and have duck and goose fat—better yet, dry oatmeal—shoved down their throats over and over and over again."

Force-feeding causes the birds' livers to swell to as much as 10 to 12 times their normal size, resulting in a painful disease known as hepatic steatosis (which makes foie gras a diseased organ and therefore illegal to sell in the U.S., according to a lawsuit filed this month by several animal protection groups). The birds often suffer from internal hemorrhaging, fungal and bacterial infections, and hepatic encephalopathy, a brain disease caused when their livers fail. They can become so debilitated that they can move only by pushing themselves along the ground with their wings.

A journalist who visited Sonoma-Artisan Foie Gras in 2003 reported that force-fed ducks "moved little and panted" with the effort, and an employee admitted that "[s]ome [ducks] die from heart failure as a result of the feeding, or from choking when they regurgitate."

A recent undercover investigation at the farm revealed filthy, bedraggled birds (failure to preen is a sign of illness or distress), birds panting and struggling to breathe, birds who were too ill to stand, and even the bodies of dead birds among the living. An average of 20 percent of ducks on foie gras farms die before slaughter, 10 to 20 times the average death rate on a regular duck farm.

Force-feeding birds has been denounced by every expert in the field of poultry welfare. Dr. Christine Nichol, a tenured poultry husbandry professor at the University of Bristol, believes that foie gras production "causes unacceptable suffering to these animals. ... It causes pain during and as a consequence of the force-feeding, feelings of malaise as the body struggles to cope with extreme nutrient imbalance and distress …."

Foie gras production is so cruel that it has been banned in more than a dozen countries, including Israel, the U.K., Germany, Norway, Poland, Sweden, and Switzerland, and it will be outlawed throughout the European Union by 2020.

Really, the only people defending foie gras are those who produce it and cook with it, and with thousands of other delectable ingredients available, it's hard to imagine why chefs are fighting tooth and, er, bill to hang onto this deadly "delicacy." Their objections should be filleted, puréed, flambéed and stuffed. Surely, any creative chef worth his or her artisanal sea salt can make do without a tortured duck's liver.

Alisa Mullins is a senior writer for the PETA Foundation, 501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510; http://www.PETA.org.
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the latest comments posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
don't eat it if you don't like itjoeFriday May 25th, 2012 9:45 AM