SF Bay Area Indymedia indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate

East Bay | Global Justice and Anti-Capitalism | Police State and Prisons

Stay Away Orders Against Occupy Oakland Protesters Are Unconstitutional
by Michael Risher, ACLU-NC
Saturday Mar 10th, 2012 5:50 PM
You don’t lose your First Amendment rights because you have been arrested at a previous demonstration. Censorship in anticipation of possible illegal conduct in the future isn’t just creepy, it’s also unconstitutional and just plain wrong.
aclu-nc_header.gif
aclu-nc_header.gif

That’s why the ACLU of Northern California filed petitions for habeas corpus today on behalf of four Occupy Oakland demonstrators. The demonstrators are challenging the court orders, imposed on them as a condition of pre-trial release, that force them to stay away from the public plaza in front of Oakland City Hall as violating their First Amendment rights. The demonstrators had been arrested at Occupy Oakland demonstrations. Many of the orders keep demonstrators between 100 yards and 300 yards away from Frank Ogawa Plaza.

In this country, it's unacceptable to keep demonstrators out of the public square because the government thinks they might engage in illegal conduct in a future demonstration. Courts have made clear that there is a special value to being able to speak in front of the seat of government authority, be it the White House or City Hall.

In this instance, the government has failed to show that the orders are necessary to serve any purpose. The orders are also overly-broad and vague.

In a recent San Francisco Chronicle Op-Ed, the Alameda County District Attorney admitted that she sought the orders in part because of her perception that the demonstrators are anti-police and anti-government. That is viewpoint discrimination, which also violates constitutional guarantees of equal protection.

The rights to speak, to assemble for demonstrations and protests, and to petition the government are among the most fundamental protections guaranteed by our state and federal Constitutions. They are also the fundamental building blocks of our democracy. Seeking to prohibit certain protesters from demonstrating in front of, or coming near, City Hall undermines these rights and values.

§petitions for habeas corpus
by ACLU-NC Saturday Mar 10th, 2012 5:54 PM

petitions for habeas corpus
§100-yard radius map
by ACLU-NC Saturday Mar 10th, 2012 8:46 PM

100-yard radius map
§300-yard radius map
by ACLU-NC Saturday Mar 10th, 2012 8:47 PM

300-yard radius map

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by anon
Sunday Mar 11th, 2012 10:58 AM
It's not just this court or this particualr action. This tactic has infested the country.

The Seattle Schools District uses the exact same tactics to discourage dissent - any parent speaking out or acting uppity can and is "banned" including from neighboring parks, sidewalks, parking lots. etc. No due process. But cops and legal threats and Notice of Trespass.

As one Schools Board Director said, "It's happening all the time everywhere".

You have to wonder what "they" are so incredibly afraid of.
by protester
Sunday Mar 11th, 2012 3:31 PM
I'm glad the ACLU is taking this on, but if you think the ACLU is doing a bang-up job of protecting “civil liberties,” whatever those are, remember that they essentially gave a green light to the recently-passed Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act—even after they had come out in opposition to the bill earlier. (For background on the AETA, visit GreenIsTheNewRed.com) They were also silent on the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act which just passed. So much for defending "free speech." Of course, their history of caving in to govenment pressure goes back to the communist witch hunts of the 50's which they were complicit in as well. They will, however, defend the KKK.