| About | Contact | Subscribe | Calendar | Publish | Donate |
|---|
San Francisco | Anti-WarView other events for the week of 9/18/2010
Add Your Comments
Comments (Hide Comments)
( humanbeingsfirst.org )
Friday Sep 17th, 2010 10:16 PM
The core-lies retained in the recent Wikileaks' disclosure – which I call 'the Afghanistan Papers' – is to once again reaffirm that there is a real nemesis called “Osama Bin Laden”, that the “war on terror” is real, that it is being inflicted upon the West from Pakistan-Iran nexus, and to re-substantiate the handoff of former President George W. Bush's clairvoyance to the Obama Administration that “If another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”! That, when such a “planned” attack transpires, it “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”. See: ‘Bin Laden’: Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan. The successful handoff of “imperial mobilization” to Pakistan and Iran, now further sprightly underscored by Wikileaks' documents, is once again demonstrated by President Obama's Secretary of State Hilary Clinton's recent remark to the BBC: “But there is no doubt in anyone's mind that should an attack against the United States be traced to be Pakistani, it would (have) a very devastating impact on our relationship”. So, could these self-serving ‘Afghanistan Papers’ have been any more convenient as a casus belli, carrying forth the same core-lies now entering its tenth year? If Wikileaks’ dramatization grabbing all the world’s headlines isn’t an officially sponsored 'modified limited hangout' for exactly that purpose of reinforcing the core-lies, then the White House not even bothering to stop the New York Times – whose own motto is ‘All the news that’s fit to print’ – from publishing it, even giving it “all got gold stars” as the Salon put it, is downright inexplicable: “So, uh … why was all of this information classified and top secret? If it’s old news, and it just confirms what “everyone” already knows, what was the rationale for keeping it classified and calling WikiLeaks all sorts of mean names for publishing it?”
The profoundly
innocent of knowledge, especially
the manufacturers of specious dissent
endorsing the revelation of the 'Afghanistan Papers'
as anything other than a 'Limited Hangout',
may try to comprehend the wily craftsmanship of the Mighty
Wurlitzer by studying this deconstruction of
Conspiracy
Theory. See source details for 'Wikileaks and the Mighty Wurlitzer' at URL: http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/wikileaks-and-the-mighty-wurlitzer-by-zahir-ebrahim/ | |||||||||||||||