| About | Contact | Subscribe | Calendar | Publish | Donate |
|---|
U.S. | Global Justice and Anti-CapitalismZionism Still Welcome at the US Social Forum
Will the US Social Forum permit militant Zionists to participate and speak for Arab and Muslim LGBTQI people? It appear so. As described here on Thursday, the US Social Forum, a diverse domestic political and cultural gathering in emulation of the World Social Forum with the objective of developing alternatives to neoliberalism, scheduled a June 24th workshop on LGTBQI Liberation in the Middle East. But there was a problem. The workshop will be conducted by Stand With Us, an American Zionist organization known for its support of an attack upon Iran, the siege of Gaza and the harassment of anti-Zionist academics and activists. More practically, Stand With Us purports to speak for Arab and Muslim LGTBQI people for which it otherwise directs hatred and contempt.
On Wednesday, someone from the Forum posted a brief comment to the Forum's Facebook page to the effect that a statement would soon be issued, after the posting of the statement. It is now Saturday, three days before the start of the Forum, and no statement has yet been publicly released. Instead, the Forum has engaged in hedging by process, inquiring of people who have raised objections as to whether they have been in direct contact with ussf organizers or the co-signers of the original letter of concern from Helem, ASWAT, Palestinian Queers for BDS, and Al-Qaws. There has, however, been a lively discussion about the participation of Stand With Us, with numerous comments in opposition posted in the last few days. Yesterday, Nada Elia, a person who has been quite persistent in expressing the opposition of Arab queers to the presence of Stand With Us, may have provided some insight into the opaque decisionmaking processes of the Forum in regard to this issue in following comment on the Arab Queers say NO to Pinkwashing at the US Social Forum Facebook page: In other words, more hedging, an attempt to protect the right of Stand with Us to speak for Arab and Muslim LGTBQI people at the Forum by means of a strategic apology. Yet again, in what I would have considered the most unlikely of places, we come face to face with the problematic relationship of the American left with Zionism. Consider, for example, my brief dialogue with Sam Molnar on the Forum's Facebook page: If a significant number of US leftists and progressives think like Sam Molnar, it is no wonder that the American political scene lacks any vitality on the left: Unfortunately, it looks like the Forum is going to do precisely what Baker fears, and evolve into yet another aggregation of leftists and progressives that serves therapeutic purposes instead of political and social ones. With my family obligations, I have not been able to attend the Forum, but I did hope that it would play a significant role in organizing a left opposition in the US. But any organization that allows militant Zionists like Stand with Us to participate has no future other than as an organizer of activist vacations. Perhaps, the Forum can invite the Minutemen to conduct a workshop on the dangers faced by undocumented people in Arizona at its next event.
Add Your Comments
Comments (Hide Comments)
Saturday Jun 19th, 2010 4:53 PM
I agree that such a group shouldn't have been allowed to have a event under the auspices of the US Social Forum . BUT since one is now scheduled i would suggest that trying to shut down the forum would be very counter productive .
Instead why not challenge every one of their lies and distortions ? When they bring up Hamas please don't try to prettify that reactionary organizaton. Point out that the Israeli Govt. tacitly backed Hamas in the 80's as a way to undermine the secular Nationalists of the PLO and the Palestine Communist party . (Sounds similar to the US backing Islamic terrorists (if you will ) in the war against the Soviets and the left nationalists of the PDPA in Afghanistan) .Challenge them what if anything they're doing to defend Gays and lesbians from rabidly homophobic Jewish fundamentalists especially in Jersuleum . And of course What the hell does the economic strangling of the Gaza Strip , hurting , undoubtly , Arab Gays among others , have to do with Gay Liberation ? Destroying them politically is far more effective than breaking up their event , which aside from possibly endangering the US forum as a whole would falsely allow them to posture as persecuted victims . My two cents.
Sunday Jun 20th, 2010 8:53 AM
"Perhaps, the Forum can invite the Minutemen to conduct a workshop on the dangers faced by undocumented people in Arizona at its next event."
While I share the concern/anger over the mistaken inclusion of this workshop, this seems unfair. Given the large number of workshops devoted to Palestinian self-determination and justice, and the involvement of USPCN and IJAN with the National Planning Committee of the Forum, is it really fair to suggest that the Social Forum is somehow down with the work of this group? The inclusion of this workshop, from what I understand, was an honest mistake, and one that the Forum folks regret very much. The workshop in question (I don't even want to write the name of the organization) was submitted dishonestly, and the organization submitting it misrepresented themselves to the Forum. It demonstrates that future Social Forums need to devote more resources to reviewing workshop proposals, but it certainly doesn't suggest that Forum organizers regard the group and its work as legitimate, or suitable for the Forum. So what about the apparent decision to not cancel the workshop? I think everyone who cares about justice for Palestine recognizes there are many ways to move forward with this. Those of us participating in the Forum - and especially its organizers - have a responsibility to the over 1000 workshops that were submitted honestly, especially those addressing the struggles of the Palestinian people. What is the best way forward for those workshops representing authentic movements for justice? Is it to cancel this one workshop and bring down the full weight of media outlets who view criticism of the Israeli government as anti-semitism (which is basically 99% of the U.S. media) and anti-Palestinian organizations? Or to find a better, more productive way forward that strengthens the movement? I don't think cancelling the workshop is the right move, and I'm glad they haven't. This is an opportunity to find new ways of dealing with the tactics this group is using, and I hope we seize it.
Sunday Jun 20th, 2010 1:04 PM
To answer franklittle the best way to counter that bullshit by the ''Lavender Zionist'' group is to do what the previous post suggested , fight them politically .
Point out their flimsy arguments and expose their backers.
Sunday Jun 20th, 2010 10:44 PM
(While you're stamping out the genocidal politics of Israel.)
Sunday Jun 20th, 2010 10:46 PM
it is hard to have much confidence in the Forum if it can't even cancel a workshop after admitting that "Stand With Us" is an organization with goals and objectives contrary to the values of the Forum, and mispresented itself to gain approval to conduct the workshop
and, yet, even though the Forum can't do that, we are supposed to believe that it will push forward and generate more unity in support of Palestine good luck with that of course, if this was a situation in which an organization affiliated with the Minutemen had someone managed to gain approval to conduct a workshop about undocumented people by misrepresenting itself, I doubt that the Forum would have had any problem with pulling the plug personally, I don't believe that it was an accident that "Stand with Us" was allowed to conduct the workshop, but given the opaque quality of how the Forum is administered, we will never know |