top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Real Risks. Real Community

by Alette Kendrick
An Open Letter to the White Student Movement by Queer Black Revolutionary
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/03/03/18639390.php

Response to a Critic of the "white" Student Movement by The Invisible Women Committee
http://occupyca.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/response-to-a-critic-of-the-%E2%80%9Cwhite%E2%80%9D-student-movement/

Why Did the March onto the 980 Freeway Happen? by Nico Dacumos
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/03/07/18640118.php

Rebuttal to "Why Did the March onto the 980 Freeway Happen" by Melissa Merin (MM)
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/03/07/18640165.php

The Raider Nation Collective Statement on the M4 Highway Takeover, by The Raider Nation (RNC)
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/03/07/18640169.php

The Dawn of The Crisis Generation, by The Crisis Generation
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/03/10/18640529.php

This letter is meant as a contribution to the larger conversation, represented by the letters linked above, happening around the public education movements. And is specifically in response to Melissa’s letter and the raider nation collective's statement. And to be clear, I am not putting this letter in context w/a continued debate around the Oscar Grant movement- based upon an understanding that the rebellions around Oscar Grant’s execution and the actions to defend public education are not comparable. Meaning, the Oscar Grant rebellions (specifically Jan 7th, 2009), was an uprising of primarily communities of color responding to vicious state violence and were spontaneous collective actions; whereas the March 4th freeway takeover, the "Berkeley riot”, and some of the other occupationist incidents were planned actions by higher ed. student communities and networks.


I wanna begin with a point on privilege, since “privilege” seems to be the hot topic, and the entry point for this conversation. Let’s talk about how the small group of folks who planned the freeway takeover were privileged- and not just because of their skin colors, but even regardless of their skin colors. That this action was planned well in advance in an intentional and thorough decision-making process, is not a question. That these planners relied on and instigated the participation of a much larger group of people who were not included in that decision making process, arguably even intentionally excluded from, is also true. And so in this way those few who did the planning privileged themselves with information of the risks involved, the details of the plan, and most importantly privileged themselves with access and opportunity for a decision making process.

Now I’ve heard the arguments, that people can make up their own minds in the street to join the action or not, that as MM said, the danger of walking onto a freeway is obvious and only “babies” would need to be told this. But I think this misses the point completely. It’s not as simple as either you have agency or you don’t, either you’re making a decision or you’re just following someone else (“led blindly” to quote RNC) There are degrees of agency, and there is such a thing as an informed decision. Imagine for a moment that you showed up to the march/rally knowing full well that by the end of it you were going to be strolling your ass onto a freeway, and you knew exactly your role and plan of action, because you’d been engaged in a decision making process for weeks in advance. Now imagine that you are someone who saw the march and decided to join up- you had no idea it was headed onto a freeway and you had to consider in that instant the potential consequences and decide in a mere moment if you’d continue or not. Seriously, imagine. Now tell me, who gets to make the more informed decisions? Who has a greater degree of agency over their situation? And even, who is more in control of what’s happening? Cause this is the part that’s get me, why as anti-authoritarians do we continuously and intentionally plot these actions that are based/dependent on a hierarchy of information, with ourselves up top.

And considering this strategy, is it not surprising that folks have been quick to attribute the planners as having a race/class-privileged mentality? Doesn’t acting within a community with no real regard for that community, reflect a mentality of entitlement? Let me point to Melissa’s letter here:

“An action which aims to stop traffic on a freeway doesn't always need to be rooted in the community… everyone who is able and/or willing should join in whatever actions they see fit to join in order to call attention, raise awareness, and disrupt business as usual, regardless of their speculated status in a presumed community.”

Yes, these types of action should take place where ever necessary/relevant. But when they depend on the participation of the communities in which they take place, then the planners should make efforts to bring those folks into the decision making process- not just handing out obscure fliers the day-of, encouraging them to “follow” and “listen to the music.” The production of those fliers seems to evidence further that the planners were primarily concerned with simply garnering bodies as numbers and not disseminating/sharing real info with potential participants.

And this gets at my main critique. The smaller group of folks who actually planned the freeway-takeover made no concerted effort to outreach to, organize in coalition with, or communicate with the organizing communities in Oakland that made up/were responsible for mobilizing the mass of folks in Oakland that day. This reflects a continued strategy of the direct action groups that I think is only serving to impede greater movement building in this context. To be clear I’m referring to the strategy of having clandestine action-planning meetings behind closed doors, removed and isolated from the larger group of people that will be effected, and not being transparent around that organizing.

And it is this, the way in which the direct-action planners have intentionally isolated themselves, that’s causing such strife. Let me point to a place in Nico’s letter here

“One of my friends, is convinced that most black bloc-ers are hired narcs for the likes of the FBI, starting shit up… I don't know about that, but I certainly know that people at the protests didn't recognize many of these white folks from any of the activist circles they frequent”

And let me emphasize that this is a concern I’ve heard echoed many times over- not the bit about being narcs specifically, but more generally about having no certainty of who these people are and what their intentions are. It’s the culture of secrecy that’s the problem- That you plan in secret, act in disguises, and then communicate only after the fact in less-than-lucid communiques usually under collective pseudonyms.* Meanwhile there’s more then ample opportunity to reach out and connect with folks on a real basis- specifically people have been doing m4 planning/organizing all over Oakland for a ridiculous amount of time and there’s been no visibility of these direct-action planners as such in those spaces, why(?) So how can you fault people for making assumptions about who you are and what your intentions are? To this extreme even, how are people supposed to know you’re not provocateurs- especially given the very real legacy of state violence against communities of color thru such programs as cointelpro?** I hear people getting very defensive about being lumped up as all “white” and “middle-class,” and that if we simply ‘scrutinized online video footage, seeing the bodies of color would prove that was wrong’ (to paraphrase RNC) But why should people be left to do that, why can’t folx step up, represent themselves and communicate in actuality?

To plan actions that specifically privilege yourselves in the ways I already discussed and to act and (not)communicate in such anonymous terms, then get so defensive- to me it all begs to question Where is the sense of community and mutual respect?- that’s what I really want to know. If you folks are actually interested in contributing to the movement building that’s happening (maybe that’s the real question), then there needs to be an understanding of how we all are in community with each other, that our actions and decisions effect one another, and that communication cannot be left as a mere afterthought.

And I’m aware of the rationale that discourages this kind of openness and transparency- security culture. Obviously there’s the concern that planning direct-actions, especially a freeway-takeover, requires utmost discretion with only people you know and trust. But I wanna suggest that the real risk worth taking in this particular moment, is to reach out beyond the safety of our insulated networks and work in coalition with the much larger number of folks mobilized/organizing right now. Imagine the potential for more powerful and stronger actions, if folks are actually supporting each other in the process.

What also concerns me here, is how the rationale of security culture may be used as cover for more dangerous underlining assumptions. It seems to me that despite their willingness to use the legacy of militancy in poc struggles as theoretical validation in the post-scripts of their actions, these planners actually harbor a basic distrust of people outside their own networks to commit with intentional forethought to taking part in direct action. Or in other words, that the willingness/ability to plan these actions is unique to them. And if this is the assumption at root, then y’all have not being paying attention.

As my final connecting piece I wanna include this bit of information. On m4 different groups of highschool students had planned to march on UCOP after the rally in Oakland. Upon seeing the folks amassing for the snake march- covering and hiding their faces in preparation- it was decided not to continue with this plan. Not knowing who these people were or any idea of their intentions, beyond what could be assumed, the group of highschool students didn’t want to be made further vulnerable to violent police repression by the “wildcard” presence of this unknown group. And on that same day, fifteen-year-old student Francois Zimany fell from the freeway sustaining serious injuries. In their communiqué released today, ‘the crisis generation’ (another anonymous entity somehow connected to the takeover) tells Francois “we don’t know you, but we love you. We are comrades for life.” So I say, where’s the love really? Where’s the solidarity, really? Love and solidarity, to me, look like stepping from behind the masks/isolation- not continuing to be so “unknown” to each other –it means talking, communicating, planning, and struggling together.

With love, respect, and solidarity
-alette kendrick
.former uc student.
.pissed off person of color.
.revolutionist.

*who are the raider nation collective, the crisis generation, the absent future, et al?? “don’t you recognize me?” –says the voice from the other side of the wall.
**as a friend pointed out it’s rather easy to be a pig provocateur in this situation, just cover yourself in black clothing join the crowd and shout enthusiastically!

---------------------------------------------
please comment, repost, etc.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by anon
I think there are some interesting points made here, and certainly do a good job depicting some of the pitfalls of certain organizing methods demonstrated by this highway takeover (such as the possibility of misleading flyers). However, it seems (correct me if I'm wrong) that this piece is also a blanket condemnation of hiding your identity and clandestine actions, both of which I have a problem with.

I don't think clandestine actions by their very nature necessitate a lack of informing potential participants of risks. Clandestine actions are really nuanced, they can be privileged (vanguardist) by placing the organizers in a position of less risk (consciously or unconsciously), but they can also be clear, self-evident, comprehensible with common sense, and shouldn't be frowned upon all together. I have seen time and again that clandestine actions can produce opportunities for people that didn't have them before... which (with a public disclosure of risks) can outweigh any potentially minor advantage of having prior knowledge that an action may take place. Knowing you could be injured and arrested 5 minutes or 5 days before you have to make a decision to participate won't really make a difference. On the other hand, if you aren't given the necessary information to understand the risks or you're even mislead, that's really f*cked up.

Folks should critique the action as much as necessary, (because certainly it had flaws), but I generally think that spontaneous decision-making to participate when a clandestine action begins doesn't necessarily mean that its bad.
by participant
thanks for this Alette... some of this is insightful and helps to move this conversation forward.

but all in all I think you are doing more harm than good here and are only doing the work of the state. I was arrested with all those people on the 880. I saw a flyer for the snake march and dance party that gave a disclaimer about joining the action at your own risk. I heard the speaker at the rally announce that there would be a group continuing on but that it could be dangerous and that youth were encouraged not to join (I assume this means the organizers of the action gave a heads up to the rally organizers). I saw numerous people running through the crowd announcing that we were going to take a highway as we approached castro street. I even saw a masked up man suggest to one of the very young skaters that he not continue onto the highway with the crowd (the kid ignored him). This seems pretty fucking responsible and open to me... not sure what else these people could have done...

I think you are doing a disservice to all of us by trying to paint a picture of shadowy anti-movement radicals who keep information to themselves so that they can profit off of other's suffering and ignorance when the shit hits the fan in the streets. I'm really glad someone put some thought into making this happen. I'm glad they thought of using flares so that traffic would stop far ahead. i'm glad they made a flyer with a disclaimer. I'm glad they went for it when the odds seemed so against us all. and I am also glad they didnt try to have the plan approved by some 'democratic' and transparent assembly of all struggling people in Oakland. no such body exists and the ones that claim to are as manipulative and fully of shadowy power plays as those who wear masks in the streets. Who are we to say that we must approve every street action? what gives us authority over what people choose to do with their bodies when they are so angry and passionate that they are willing to put it all on the line? Yes, the highway action was very risky. but i am so proud of everyone who took that risk and I have been amazed at how many ordinary people outside of our stupid activist ghettos have really identified with it and support it. Its so sad that we sit here alone tearing each other apart.

So with all due respect. fuck off.

PS: dont fool yourself. pigs have been infiltrating all sorts of groups, militant and very-much-not-militant. just look back a few years ago to articles about liberal anti war groups finding out they had been spied on and infiltrated...
by anon again
Seriously, whether you're right or not, you need to chill. Respect means that you don't tell someone to fuck off just because you disagree. Where in Alette's critique does she tell you to fuck off because she disagrees with you?

Who cares if she does a disservice to the movement if you disservice your own argument by sounding like an douche.
by And I'm laughing
You are one hypocritical piece of work, and I have NO respect for you.

You say here "So I say, where’s the love really? Where’s the solidarity, really?"

But when you got your ass busted for a maverick action at UCSC some years back, what did you do?

-Played the race card and tried to cover your maverick actions and lack of self-controlled actions by trying to color the administrations reactions as due to your being a woman of color. I never bought that, cause I personally watched you do the shyt you were later charged for. So I guess it's okay for you to go maverick, but these folks should have thought it out?

-You played the race card again by holding up a poster of the Chancellor at UCSC with the words "white devil" printed on his face. Good for the goose but not the gander, eh?

-And then you rolled over, acknowledged the reality of the situation, and plea bargined the deal by apologizing to cover your butt.

So in my mind, you're a hypocrite. You preach the hard line to others, then cover your own butt by compromising. You went rogue yourself, but now are chiding others for doing the same thing. You played the race card by dragging in student groups and Angela to protect you, then you turned around and used race as a weapon against the UCSC Chancellor.

IMO, yer a hypocrite and a sellout.
by anonymous poster
i was watching the dance party while i was waiting for my bus, and when the pigs started approaching the protesters, all the people at the bus stop said "yeah, get um. fuckin white people makin my bus late" and when one of them saw a pig running forward with that orange shotgun, he said "yea shoot those niggas." "if that was us, we would get pepper sprayed and tear gassed, but not the fuckin white ppl"

so, yeah i don't know why everybody has to make race an issue when it otherwise shouldn't be. some of us, students and protesters, are fucking white. what do you want us to do about it?
by in the area
i was wanderin around there with the splinter march and I dont know what the hell you r talkin about. a lot of people looked hella confused or curious but no one seemed angry. i saw a bunch of people at different points cheering the anarchists, students, youth, and activists on. some even joined. people in downtown oakland dont usually take the pigs' side...
by Nick
Some of you commenters need to turn off the morphine drip before you write some of this shit. Y'all are embarassing yourselves. "Race card?" Who are you, Glenn Beck?
by x
we all need to hear this and think about it.

shame on the other commentators for using the anonymity of the internet to be hostile and abusive.
by Adam W.
First, I don't think Alette is criticizing the tactic of a freeway occupation itself, but the way those who organized it went about and I think this is fair to raise. Second, I think the above posts miss the key points of Alette's piece, so I wanted to highlight them:

The smaller group of folks who actually planned the freeway-takeover made no concerted effort to outreach to, organize in coalition with, or communicate with the organizing communities in Oakland that made up/were responsible for mobilizing the mass of folks in Oakland that day. This reflects a continued strategy of the direct action groups that I think is only serving to impede greater movement building in this context... the direct-action planners have intentionally isolated themselves...

...why can’t folx step up, represent themselves and communicate in actuality?

...the real risk worth taking in this particular moment, is to reach out beyond the safety of our insulated networks and work in coalition with the much larger number of folks mobilized/organizing right now. Imagine the potential for more powerful and stronger actions, if folks are actually supporting each other in the process.

What also concerns me here, is how the rationale of security culture may be used as cover for more dangerous underlining assumptions. It seems to me that despite their willingness to use the legacy of militancy in poc struggles as theoretical validation in the post-scripts of their actions, these planners actually harbor a basic distrust of people outside their own networks to commit with intentional forethought to taking part in direct action. Or in other words, that the willingness/ability to plan these actions is unique to them. And if this is the assumption at root, then y’all have not being paying attention.
by williamjames
Alette's comment, knowingly or not, acts to inhibit direct action. It is well-known that police and homeland security infiltrate whenever possible. Because of this, planning must be done in groups that exclude unknown individuals. Alette's comment does not respect this reality.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network