| About | Contact | Subscribe | Calendar | Publish | Donate |
|---|
U.S. | Global Justice and Anti-Capitalism | Government & ElectionsNADER/PSL VS. OBAMA/MCKINNEY
a posting directed at socialist and anarchist activists. i argue that the most consistent pro-socialist / pro-anarchist perspective against the bipartisan dictatorship in the united states and for anti-capitalism and peace would call for participation in the nader or better yet, the party of socialism and liberation campaigns. ![]() nader-gonzalez_08_sticker... i object that the only two legitimate alternatives to obama (a liberal imperialist) and mc cain (a conservative imperialist) - from the perspective of the PRO-SOCIALIST sector – could be ralph nader at minimum, and the campaign recently initiated by the party for socialism and liberation at best (where it might be on the ballot). when i state this i am proceeding from the perspective that THE POINT of these campaigns is not to get-out-the-vote for nader or the psl. pro-socialist and “marxist” persons should know better than anyone that the 2008 election is as fixed as where those in 2000 and 2004, and that given the reality of endemic voter fraud, through list purges and voting machine rigging, there is no guarantee the votes casted will be counted accurately. the aim is not either to seek to “pressure obama” or “keep him accountable” because obama is already bought and paid for by the business interests that fund him, and he has never been a part of “the left” to begin with.
pro-socialist persons seek to become ACTIVE with these alternative left campaigns between now and november 4th, to organise in favour of platform positions that aim to expose the electoral public to social and ecological perspectives and SOLUTIONS that are marginalised from public discourse in context of this false election process. i interject the term “false”, because i am clear, further, that the election constitutes a stage managed media event designed to refurbish the “democratic” credentials of united states imperialism at a time of domestic and global (food, energy and credit) crisis of neoliberal capitalism. by "legitimate" and "independent", i mean that the nader and psl campaigns are in no way connected (directly or indirectly) to the democrat party or receive funding from it or from pro-democrat foundations associated with it. as i wrote before: i take issue with the idea that dennis kucinich and cynthia mckinney represent a progressive agenda, the first is actually a [bait and switch] democrat party agent of disinformation whose task is to mislead the subjective left into dead ends; [mc kinney] is a democrat party operative who presides over the hijacking and transformation of the united states green party into a democrat party front group that backhandedly campaigns for obama by not challenging him. the proof is in that the green party is calling for votes for mckinney only in so called "safe states". a legitimate effort to present a left antinomian agenda must take as its starting point the premise that a TOTAL break with the democrat party is necessary in order to articulate and build an independent campaign. as a concluding objection, I propose that the correct choice for pro-socialist persons in the united states should be to BECOME INVOLVED with the party of socialism and liberation in states where they appear on the ballot, and with the nader campaign in states where the psl is not on the ballot. http://www.votepsl.org/ http://www.votenader.org/ - neo. Discussion: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/redsquare2/
Nader and PSL Election Strickers
![]() 22121.jpg |
Listed below are the latest comments posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by website visitors.