top
California
California
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Los Angeles City Council Votes to End Federal DEA Medical Marijuana Raids

by Americans for Safe Access
*MEDIA RELEASE
Americans for Safe Access
For Immediate Release: *July 25, 2007
*Los Angeles City Council Votes to End Federal DEA Medical Marijuana Raids
*/Meanwhile, DEA intensifies effort with raids today on at least 6
dispensaries in the city

/*Los Angeles, CA *-- As the Los Angeles City Council voted today to
move forward with the regulation of medical cannabis (marijuana)
dispensaries, federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents were
conducting raids on at least 6 dispensaries in the greater Los Angeles
area. The Council approved the first reading today of a moratorium on
new dispensaries in the city, with final approval expected within a
week. The moratorium will give the city time to draft regulations that
would establish a permit process and guidelines for providers of medical
marijuana. The Council also passed a resolution in support of a vote in
Congress scheduled to occur today that would deny funding to the U.S.
Department of Justice, and the DEA, for enforcement against medical
marijuana patients and providers.

Los Angeles City Councilmember, and former police officer, Dennis Zine,
held a press conference this morning, prior to the vote, where he
revealed a letter sent by three Councilmembers to DEA Administrator
Karen Tandy. The letter from Los Angeles Councilmembers Dennis Zine,
Janice Hahn and Bill Rosendahl was sent in response to increased federal
activity, including numerous raids on medical cannabis dispensaries as
well as letters sent by the DEA to at least 140 landlords of dispensing
facilities. The letter requests that the DEA "abandon this tactic and
allow this City Council to continue the important work of regulating
these facilities without Federal interference." Despite the apparent
conflict between state and federal law, Zine affirms the need to "uphold
the will of our voters and adopt sensible guidelines to regulate the
provision of medical cannabis in our communities."

A vote will also take place in Congress today that would prevent federal
funds to be used to interfere in the twelve states that have adopted
medical marijuana laws. The Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment to the House
Commerce-Justice-State appropriations bill, named after its authors
Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) and Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), would end the
federal crackdown currently occurring in Los Angeles and other parts of
California. The resolution adopted today by the Los Angeles City Council
supports the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment and the prohibition of
further raids on "[medical] marijuana dispensaries in states that have
laws supporting their operation."

"These continued actions by the DEA, in spite of the strong endorsement
of medical marijuana by the Los Angeles City Council, is reprehensible,"
said Chris Fusco, the Southern California Field Coordinator for
Americans for Safe Access, the nation's largest medical marijuana
advocacy organization. "It shows that the federal government will stop
at nothing to undermine California's medical marijuana law, and that
today's DEA actions are in retaliation for the successful work being
done by advocates and city officials." Two hundred protesters gathered
today at California Patients Group, one of the dispensaries raided by
the DEA, and confronted federal agents. Instead of arresting a group of
people being held inside the facility, federal agents were forced to
release them or face continued civil disobedience, in the form of
blockades, by protesters at the scene.

In another apparent rebuke locally to federal efforts against medical
marijuana access, Los Angeles' neighbor to the east, the City of
Claremont, voted Tuesday night to allow and regulate a dispensary within
its city limits.

In order to bring attention to the increased federal activity by the
DEA, Americans for Safe Access (ASA) is calling for statewide protests
Friday. In Los Angeles, protests will occur at 9am at the federal
building (255 East Temple) to be followed by a march to City Hall (200 N
Spring St.) to request that the city do everything it can to ensure
protection for its patients and providers from further federal interference.

For further information, refer to:
Letter from LA Councilmembers to DEA Administrator Karen Tandy:
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/Zine_DEA_Letter.pdf
Resolution adopted by the Los Angeles City Council in support of
Hinchey-Rohrabacher:
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/LA_Resolution.pdf
The DEA letter to more than 140 landlords in the Los Angeles area:
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/DEA_Landlord_Letter.pdf
ASA's one-pager on the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment:
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/Hinchey_One_Pager.pdf

# # #

With over 30,000 active members in more than 40 states, Americans for
Safe Access (ASA) is the largest national member-based organization of
patients, medical professionals, scientists and concerned citizens
promoting safe and legal access to cannabis for therapeutic use and
research. ASA works to overcome political and legal barriers by creating
policies that improve access to medical cannabis for patients and
researchers through legislation, education, litigation, grassroots
actions, advocacy and services for patients and the caregivers.

--
Kris Hermes
Media Specialist
Americans for Safe Access
http://www.SafeAccessNow.org
1322 Webster Street, Suite 402
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: 510-251-1856 x307
Fax: 510-251-2036
Email: kris [at] SafeAccessNow.org

Americans for Safe Access (ASA) is the largest
national member-based organization of patients,
medical professionals, scientists and concerned
citizens promoting safe and legal access to
cannabis for therapeutic use and research.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by KIEF LEAF NEWS - Sister Somayah Kambui (sisterhemp [at] aol.com)
KIEF LEAF NEWS - L.A. Project Hemp

LOS ANGELES is the last city and county in the State of California to comply with the California State Initiative Law known as the COMPASSIONATE USE ACT 1996 to protect the seriously ill citizenry of the City of Los Angeles and their Caregivers.

The U.S. federal laws over "marijuana" does not recognize "marijuana" as a medical necessity, nor accept "medical necessity" as a defense. However, the COMPASSIONATE USE ACT 1996 does not claim a "necessity" but instead the COMPASSIONATE USE ACT 1996 mandates a "PURPOSE", i.e. "marijuana for medical purposes", which offers another angle to protect patients & caregivers in federal Court.

LOS ANGELES city and county officials have failed to apply public ordinance or policy to protect and defend the citizenry of Los Angeles, to exercise there right under the COMPASSIONATE USE ACT 1996 as guaranteed right under the Constitution of the United States of America. California State Constitution guarantees the voters vote to establish an "initiative law" such as the COMPASSIONATE USE ACT 1996 or California Health and Safety Code 11362.5.

There is amist yet another challenge before the lawmakers and law enforcers. The fact that this is a DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY that has set policy of respecting the PEOPLE'S VOTE over any other. In other words, the fact that over 56% of the CALIFORNIA STATE VOTERS voted in the Compassionate Use Act 1996 to protect people to use "marijuana for medical purposes", sets precedent over any other law governing criminal acts with "marijuana".

The criminal charges of POSSESSION or CULTIVATION, that would ordinarily apply to anyone who is not a qualified patient DOES NOT APPLY to a qualified patient nor does it apply to the CAREGIVER who assumes the responsibility to provide health, safety, shelter, etc to a seriously ill person.

ASSUMING RESPONSIBILITY gave rise to the "dispensaries" as a result of having to meet the needs of seriously ill people who could not provide their own independent source of cannabis/"marijuana for medical purposes", without the assistance of a person experienced in growing, cultivating, curing, and storing the plant material properly to be consumed or used for medical purposes.

Unfortunately, the "dispensaries" have defeated their own purpose by allowing terminologies such as "dispensary", "farmacy/pharmacy" or other innuendoes resembling a "drug store" environment;a RED FLAG for a D.E.A. Hater-Raids!

Since the onset of the State's VOLUNTEER PROGRAM known as SENATE BILL 420, the MEDICAL BOARD and STATE LEGISLATURES have attempted to undermined the State's Initiative Law PROPOSITION 215, and undermined the will of the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA by restricting letters of recommendation and approval for marijuana for medical purposes, to MEDICAL DOCTORS (M.D.'s), which is NOT what the STATE LAW laid out to comply.

M.D.'s were NOT the first to step to the plate to protect the citizenry with letters of recommendation or approval, as a rule. The law only dictated that the citizen have oral or written recommendation or approval from a licensed California State physician. The first line of physicians included a few M.D.'s but most of the initial letters were written by Doctors of Chiropractic, Dentists, Podiatrists, Psychiatrists and the like who possess a license to practice as a physician in California.

California State Constitution Article 3, Section 3.5 fobids local and state officials and employees to refuse to apply or enforce a California State initiative law claiming that that Initiative law is in conflict with federal law. The federal government has to challenge the State law as "unconstitutional" or the State's Appeals Court would have to declare the law unconstitutional in order to repeal or rescind our State Initiative law. Why? In California it has been coined, "ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE" - People's Power, others call it the AMERICAN WAY.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST is the way to fight back. That is as soon as someone goes to LAW SCHOOL, passes the BAR and becomes the ATTORNEY to bring up the issue that it is a CONFLICT OF INTEREST for local or state law enforcement to accept federal funding to shut down facilities availing people to cannabis/marijuana for medical purposes in conflict with the WILL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. In fact, a real attorney would charge TREASON, and line 'em up to be.....oh well.

ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE

Queen Negus Sister Somayah Kambui
NIGRITIAN KIEF SOCIETY
Project HEMP L.A.
323 232 0935
sisterhemp [at] aol.com
hempsister [at] yahoo.com



NIGRITIAN KIEF SOCIETY - Los Angeles
Queen Negus Somayah Kambui - founder
Crescent Alliance Self Help for Sickle Cell - member

note: we are not a dispensary but a sacred cooperative - we fight back
.............the reluctant need not apply
323 232 0935 sisterhemp [at] aol.com
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network