SF Bay Area Indymedia indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate

East Bay | Fault Lines | Global Justice and Anti-Capitalism

Emeryville: The “Dirtiest Little Town on the Pacific Coast”
by Hannah Potassium ( sfbay-print [at] lists.indymedia.org )
Thursday Aug 24th, 2006 12:03 AM
Emeryville swells as a phenomenon for the rising generation—a theme park for the culturally vacant, a carnival ride for those content to watch their money burn. It’s a wonder that the place can be considered a township at all, as the most powerful politicians are quite realistically Pixar, Chiron, Siebel Systems, and Ikea (of which the former two have their own “districts” and the latter is a “big box” retail structure).

Between the fictional characters of the animation studio and the mad scientists of the biotechnology lab, it is easy to forget about the reality of place in this consummate fantasyland.

Its portrayal of Main Street, USA is eerily accurate. However, the utopian vision of flawless, exemplary Emeryville carries with it dark undertones more complicated than choosing what to order at the Marketplace food court and far less pleasant than even the stench of Abercrombie and Fitch cologne that wafts across the tracks.

Emeryville has always been an epicenter for vice and corruption. Beginning with the brutal usurpation of land from the Ohlone tribes by the Spanish in the late 1700s, there has consistently been a thinly veiled obsession with profit that masquerades as “culture.” Police Chief Ken James calls it “the little city that can.” Their motto is: “Our strength is our people.”
But with a population of less than 7,000 (according to the 2000 census) in a space of just over one square mile, we might have to hope for some unusually strong people…or a secret weapon.

Is it really the city’s people that make it so powerful? Most of its residents actually commute out to work in other parts of the Bay Area. And most of its employees are imported in. Professional jobs dominate employment in Emeryville at 25 percent, with managerial and executive positions close behind at 19.8 percent. The rest of the work is mostly retail, which makes sense because the city is essentially just a very large mall. Such jobs tend to be dominated by white folks, and would thus alter the census’ statistic of a mere 45 percent white population.

As Emeryville juxtaposes itself quaintly beside big, bad Oakland, it discreetly aims to attract a bulk of white people with deep pockets. Currently twelve major development projects are underway within city limits, tending to be cumbersome and architecturally monotonous loft complexes. This will provide construction jobs for many, though it is quite likely that these workers will never be able to afford the very residences they are building.

According to the Agency’s Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance, at least 20 percent of new residential units must be designated “affordable housing.” But the ambiguity of the word “affordable” (meaning in this context an individual $46,350 per year income or less) may lend itself to an exclusion of a number of potential homeowners. Low (or even moderate) income families may find themselves chased to the other side of the invisible Oakland/Emeryville line, the subtle claws of gentrification scratching at their heels.

One illustration of this city’s underpinning commitment to homogenization is the array of bizarre, one-time grants that the Economic Development Department offers to property owners who want to improve the aesthetic of their property and increase its value—including the $5,000 “Wrought Iron Fence Grant,” which promises to remove any “existing, non-conforming fence” and replace it with a “decorative, open type” one.

The model example of this New Urbanism is the Bay Street Mall: “a vertically integrated mixed-use community where one can live, work, shop, dine, and recreate without the need for an automobile.” This development’s PR has been painfully effective, cloaking obvious displacement in subtle buzzwords and pretty phrases like “urban renewal.” The San Francisco Chronicle touts Bay Street as a “European-style urban village.” It is this same language that morphs “high-end chain stores” into “shops and boutiques,” and “corporate personhood” into “community.” With one-bedroom condos ranging from $650,000 to $730,000 above stores such as Gap, Banana Republic, and Pottery Barn, skewed jargon like “village” becomes mere newspeak.

With a long tradition of debauchery, Bay Street’s capitalist predecessors may have been proud to witness the lasting crooked nature of the city. Nothing underscores this notion better than when, in 1876, the city stuck a dance pavilion directly atop the last remaining Ohlone shellmound—and quite literally danced on the ashes of the natives.

By the late nineteenth century, Emeryville had earned the title of the “Entertainment Capital of the Easy Bay” with its saloons, brothels, card clubs, and racetracks, buttressed by further illegal gambling and a lucrative business in speakeasies during Prohibition. Earl Warren, the District Attorney of Alameda County at the time, once raided the Emeryville Police Garage to find a “liquor fleet” of five cars holding 565 gallons of booze. He had been quoted saying, “Within a block of the police of Emeryville are 12 houses of prostitution and 20 bootlegging joints.” This center of vice had few rivals.

With the criminalization of horseracing in 1911, the red-light district morphed into an industrial hub for the Bay Area, consuming nearly 80 percent of the city with paint factories, chemical manufacturers, petroleum refineries, canneries, slaughterhouses, and more. The slaughterhouses were so numerous, in fact, that the area became known as Butchertown; a place engulfed by a detestable stench of manure and burning bones.

For all of these reasons, residents deemed Emeryville “morally reprehensive” and began to organize for reform. As a result, landowners, investors, and industrialists adopted the most obvious solution to the problem the reformist groups posed: they simply redrew the city boundaries to exclude every church and complaining neighborhood. Emeryville has since flourished (or festered) as an icon of decadence and destruction …proving that this “little city that can” could actually do quite a bit.

These days, Emeryville likes to think of itself as undergoing a Renaissance of sorts. But rather than a complete makeover, it can realistically only dab a bit of cosmetic powder on its blemishes, leaving an embarrassing cakey residue. Brownfields—or land that is considered toxic due to industry—comprise over one quarter of the city’s landmass. Diesel fumes, exhaust, and the unmistakable fetor from a heavily contaminated Bay hangs in the air. Emeryville’s sordid past is, in many ways, irreversible.

In 1915, the city began slowly covering the Temescal Creek, and by 2005 there were no visible remains. According to the 1993 General Plan, no wildlife or important plant communities exist at all east of the 580 freeway. The Emeryville Crescent tidal marsh is home to over 100 wildlife species, including endangered animals like the Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse and the California Clapper Rail. But human pollution is choking them and destroying the marsh’s ecosystem … while the mudflats are just downright ugly. It is worth noting that the coastline of the San Francisco Bay has significantly changed shape since 1820 as a result of the century of industry surrounding it. Earl Warren called Emeryville “the dirtiest little town on the Pacific Coast.” Perhaps he meant it in more ways than one.

The new strategy, as outlined in a report on the city’s website, is to increase green space, decrease wasted space, add more mixed use complexes, and overall make Emeryville more dense and walkable. (Currently, of the 790 acres that comprise the city, 160 acres are parking lots and garages, and only 33 acres are considered “open space.”)

So is Emeryville entering a new age of social and environmental conscious? Hardly. We are simply entering a new age of profiteering in which the market has shifted, where green space and walkability are in demand. This is profit masquerading as culture. So dress up all you want, Emeryville. In the end, you just look tacky.
§See No E-Ville
by Hannah Potassium Thursday Aug 24th, 2006 12:03 AM

Photos by Liam O'Donoghue
§See No E-Ville
by Hannah Potassium Thursday Aug 24th, 2006 12:03 AM

Photos by Liam O'Donoghue

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by CG
Thursday Aug 24th, 2006 6:44 PM
Emeryville has definitely become the Bay Area's "bastard child" -- its hideous, but you still secretly love it. While no one WANTS a "suburban" vibe in this urban paradise, there is no denying that sometimes, you just really need something from Pottery Barn, and would like to be able to DRIVE and PARK close by. As a Berkeley resident, I often find myself driving on over to Emeryville for my domestic needs. But would I ever want to live in Emeryville (or admit that I visit often)? NO.

Sometimes, you just need a cheap, homogenous, modern piece of furniture, and you dont want an old funky used piece from Urban Ore. So, I love Emeryville for what it is, I love that it is nearby, but I would NEVER NEVER want to call it "my town."
by HPO
Friday Aug 25th, 2006 9:00 PM
Can't quite figure out if the author is nostalgic for the brothels or would simply like the brownfields to remain vacant. I say "bravo" to all (and I'm sure they're not all "culturally vacant") who've made investments in transforming Emeryville. It's not perfect -- nothing ever is. But, it is a heckuva lot better than it used to be.
by regular guy
Wednesday Aug 30th, 2006 7:26 PM
i live in emeryville. it is fine. just relax would you?
by Furillo
Tuesday Sep 5th, 2006 1:35 PM
We moved to Emeryville two years ago after 25 years in Berkeley and Oakland. Industrial history and brownfields? Sure; and we are cleaning them up. Incredible location? You bet! At fault for pollution in the SF Bay? No way. Need more green space? Absolutely. Crime? Less than any place we have lived in the East Bay, including the hills. Great energy from the residents, and a feeling that individuals actually can make a difference? Absolutely. The reason we have ugly malls is because people living all over the Bay area want to shop in them. We just turn our back on them, take the tax money, and get on with life. Emeryville has the best PROSPECTS of any city in the East Bay precisely because it has a good tax base and a great location. We may screw it up, but why not root for us instead of slam our "colorful" history?
by c
Friday Mar 2nd, 2007 9:52 PM
This article is very interesting. I think even more so seeing we have lived in a hotel for 2 years, 7 months, and counting thanks to a developer who "owns" the city. Please visit our site to understand more about our situation. Wareham Development
Emeryville is definitely a city catering to corporate interests and has a problem handling their development. Mostly at the expense of those who live, work or shop there, but eventually it will impact those same investors and civic leaders who are responsible for the problems.

Wareham Development is busy buying up buildings and lots in the East Bay (particularly E-ville) and charging top dollar for their product. Although they do a good job in the finishes and landscaping, their relationships with their customers is lacking. They're essentially evicting the longtime residents of the old Fantasy Studios due to price increases and they will likely price themselves out of taking on hot little biotech startup, Aerovance, as a customer.

The City of E-ville and it's developers and businesses have run roughshod over issues such as traffic planning, and some of the output of these project is plain stupid. Try driving to Trader Joe's on Saturday afternoon where there's a mammoth paking lot with only two ways in and out of the whole thing. The Bike Boulevard on Horton Street (Kudos for trying!) is potholed and the bike lane is blocked daily by Fed Ex, UPS, Arrowhead, Airgas, Therma, Fisher Scientific, and all the other vendors serving developments by folks like Wareham where there aren't adequate loading docks and zones. These delivery drivers must park in redzones because the forsight wasn't there by government officials and developers. And the E-ville Police Department turns a blind eye to the mess. The message is clear, the safe way to commute through E-ville is to drive.

When these government officials (etc) start grandstanding about fighting global warming in the coming months, throw tomatoes. The malls of E-ville will be underwater in a few decades and no one in the future is going to be impressed by what these clowns have condoned as "business as usual".