From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD CALLS FOR PROSECUTION OF PRESIDENT BUSH
The National Lawyers Guild calls for the
prosecution of President George W. Bush with a "command responsibility"
theory of liability under the War Crimes Act. Bush can be prosecuted under
the War Crimes Act or the Torture Statute, if he knew or should have known
about the U.S. military's use of torture and failed to stop or prevent it.
prosecution of President George W. Bush with a "command responsibility"
theory of liability under the War Crimes Act. Bush can be prosecuted under
the War Crimes Act or the Torture Statute, if he knew or should have known
about the U.S. military's use of torture and failed to stop or prevent it.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Michael Avery, President, 617-573-8551
Heidi Boghosian, Executive Director, 212-679-5100, ext. 11
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD CALLS FOR PROSECUTION OF PRESIDENT BUSH FOR ROLE IN
TORTURE
2003 State of the Union Address Contained Implicit Admission
New York, June 18, 2004--The National Lawyers Guild calls for the
prosecution of President George W. Bush with a "command responsibility"
theory of liability under the War Crimes Act. Bush can be prosecuted under
the War Crimes Act or the Torture Statute, if he knew or should have known
about the U.S. military's use of torture and failed to stop or prevent it.
A comment in the President's January 2003 State of the Union Address
contained an implicit admission by Bush that he had sanctioned the summary
execution of many when he said: "All told, more than 3,000 suspected
terrorists have been arrested in many countries, and many others have met a
different fate." "Let's put it this way," he continued, "they are no longer
a problem for the United States and our friends and allies."
The Defense Department and the Justice Department each commissioned
documents attempting to justify the use of torture under the President's
war-making power, notwithstanding the Constitution's clear mandate that
only Congress can make the laws. The Defense Department memo said that as
commander-in-chief, the President has a "constitutionally superior
position" to Congress. This blatant disregard for the tripartite Separation
of Powers doctrine is also contrary to the landmark ruling in the Korean
War case, Youngstown Sheet & Tire Co. v. Sawyers, in which the Supreme
Court held, "In the framework of our Constitution, the President's power to
see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be
a lawmaker."
The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment was ratified by the United States and is thus part
of the supreme law of the land. Congress implemented U.S. obligations under
this treaty by enacting the Torture Statute, which provides 20 years, life
in prison, or even the death penalty if death results from torture
committed by a U.S. citizen abroad. The USA PATRIOT Act added the crime of
conspiracy to commit torture to the Torture Statute. The Convention Against
Torture prohibits the intentional infliction of severe physical or mental
pain or suffering on a person to (a) obtain a confession, (b) punish him or
(c) intimidate or coerce him based on discrimination of any kind. To
violate this treaty, the pain or suffering must be inflicted "by or at the
instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or
other person acting in an official capacity."
The Istanbul Protocol of 9 August 1999 is the Manual on the Effective
Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment. It sets forth international guidelines
for the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights. Included in the
Protocol's list of torture methods are rape, blunt trauma, forced
positioning, asphyxiation, crush injuries, humiliations, death threats,
forced engagement in practices violative of religion, and threat of attacks
by dogs. The photographs and reports from prisoners in Abu Ghraib include
all of these techniques. Moreover, the Defense Department analysis
maintained that a torturer could get off it he acted in "good faith," not
thinking his actions would result in severe mental harm. If the torturer
based his conduct on the advice of these memos, he could according to this
argument, have acted in good faith.
Referring to the 9/11 Commission's preliminary reports issued this week,
National Lawyers Guild President Michael Avery said: "The Justice
Department memorandum reads like a pre-trial brief on behalf of the Nazi
defendants in the Nuremberg trial. It's rife with justification after
justification for the use of torture."
Bush implicitly admitted sanctioning willful killing, torture and/or
inhuman treatment in his 2003 State of the Union Address. The Constitution
mandates the impeachment of a President for high crimes and misdemeanors.
There is no higher crime than a war crime. Willful killing, torture and
inhuman treatment constitute grave breaches of the Geneva Convention, which
are considered war crimes under The War Crimes Act of 1996.
The National Lawyers Guild, founded in 1937, comprises over 6,000 members
and activists in the service of the people. Its national office is
headquartered in New York and it has chapters in nearly every state, as
well as over 100 law school chapters. Guild members provide legal support
to progressive demonstrations throughout the country, and well understand
the nationwide trend toward increasingly repressive measures deployed
against political protesters.
-30-
Contact: Michael Avery, President, 617-573-8551
Heidi Boghosian, Executive Director, 212-679-5100, ext. 11
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD CALLS FOR PROSECUTION OF PRESIDENT BUSH FOR ROLE IN
TORTURE
2003 State of the Union Address Contained Implicit Admission
New York, June 18, 2004--The National Lawyers Guild calls for the
prosecution of President George W. Bush with a "command responsibility"
theory of liability under the War Crimes Act. Bush can be prosecuted under
the War Crimes Act or the Torture Statute, if he knew or should have known
about the U.S. military's use of torture and failed to stop or prevent it.
A comment in the President's January 2003 State of the Union Address
contained an implicit admission by Bush that he had sanctioned the summary
execution of many when he said: "All told, more than 3,000 suspected
terrorists have been arrested in many countries, and many others have met a
different fate." "Let's put it this way," he continued, "they are no longer
a problem for the United States and our friends and allies."
The Defense Department and the Justice Department each commissioned
documents attempting to justify the use of torture under the President's
war-making power, notwithstanding the Constitution's clear mandate that
only Congress can make the laws. The Defense Department memo said that as
commander-in-chief, the President has a "constitutionally superior
position" to Congress. This blatant disregard for the tripartite Separation
of Powers doctrine is also contrary to the landmark ruling in the Korean
War case, Youngstown Sheet & Tire Co. v. Sawyers, in which the Supreme
Court held, "In the framework of our Constitution, the President's power to
see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be
a lawmaker."
The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment was ratified by the United States and is thus part
of the supreme law of the land. Congress implemented U.S. obligations under
this treaty by enacting the Torture Statute, which provides 20 years, life
in prison, or even the death penalty if death results from torture
committed by a U.S. citizen abroad. The USA PATRIOT Act added the crime of
conspiracy to commit torture to the Torture Statute. The Convention Against
Torture prohibits the intentional infliction of severe physical or mental
pain or suffering on a person to (a) obtain a confession, (b) punish him or
(c) intimidate or coerce him based on discrimination of any kind. To
violate this treaty, the pain or suffering must be inflicted "by or at the
instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or
other person acting in an official capacity."
The Istanbul Protocol of 9 August 1999 is the Manual on the Effective
Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment. It sets forth international guidelines
for the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights. Included in the
Protocol's list of torture methods are rape, blunt trauma, forced
positioning, asphyxiation, crush injuries, humiliations, death threats,
forced engagement in practices violative of religion, and threat of attacks
by dogs. The photographs and reports from prisoners in Abu Ghraib include
all of these techniques. Moreover, the Defense Department analysis
maintained that a torturer could get off it he acted in "good faith," not
thinking his actions would result in severe mental harm. If the torturer
based his conduct on the advice of these memos, he could according to this
argument, have acted in good faith.
Referring to the 9/11 Commission's preliminary reports issued this week,
National Lawyers Guild President Michael Avery said: "The Justice
Department memorandum reads like a pre-trial brief on behalf of the Nazi
defendants in the Nuremberg trial. It's rife with justification after
justification for the use of torture."
Bush implicitly admitted sanctioning willful killing, torture and/or
inhuman treatment in his 2003 State of the Union Address. The Constitution
mandates the impeachment of a President for high crimes and misdemeanors.
There is no higher crime than a war crime. Willful killing, torture and
inhuman treatment constitute grave breaches of the Geneva Convention, which
are considered war crimes under The War Crimes Act of 1996.
The National Lawyers Guild, founded in 1937, comprises over 6,000 members
and activists in the service of the people. Its national office is
headquartered in New York and it has chapters in nearly every state, as
well as over 100 law school chapters. Guild members provide legal support
to progressive demonstrations throughout the country, and well understand
the nationwide trend toward increasingly repressive measures deployed
against political protesters.
-30-
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Put the whole Cabal on Trial!
Sat, Jun 19, 2004 2:45PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network